183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36417129)
1. Learned feature regularities enable suppression of spatially overlapping stimuli.
Thayer DD; Miller M; Giesbrecht B; Sprague TC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):769-784. PubMed ID: 36417129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learned distractor rejection persists across target search in a different dimension.
Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):785-795. PubMed ID: 36045310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. No reliable effect of task-irrelevant cross-modal statistical regularities on distractor suppression.
Jagini KK; Sunny MM
Cortex; 2023 Apr; 161():77-92. PubMed ID: 36913824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Suppression of a salient distractor protects the processing of target features.
Narhi-Martinez W; Dube B; Chen J; Leber AB; Golomb JD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 37528277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical Learning of Distractor Suppression Downregulates Prestimulus Neural Excitability in Early Visual Cortex.
Ferrante O; Zhigalov A; Hickey C; Jensen O
J Neurosci; 2023 Mar; 43(12):2190-2198. PubMed ID: 36801825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical regularities induce spatial as well as feature-specific suppression.
Failing M; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Wang B; Olivers C; Theeuwes J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1291-1303. PubMed ID: 31157536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
Wang B; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distractor ignoring is as effective as target enhancement when incidentally learned but not when explicitly cued.
Addleman DA; Störmer VS
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):834-844. PubMed ID: 36229632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation.
Failing M; Wang B; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 30868474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical regularities bias overt attention.
Wang B; Samara I; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1813-1821. PubMed ID: 30919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.
Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):270-282. PubMed ID: 33251562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Learned spatial suppression is not always proactive.
Chang S; Dube B; Golomb JD; Leber AB
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1031-1041. PubMed ID: 37199949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical learning of distractor shape modulates attentional capture.
Kim H; Ogden A; Anderson BA
Vision Res; 2023 Jan; 202():108155. PubMed ID: 36417810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search.
Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):359-376. PubMed ID: 30421366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial suppression due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.
Lin R; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33078381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. No evidence for spatial suppression due to across-trial distractor learning in visual search.
Li AS; Bogaerts L; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1088-1105. PubMed ID: 36823261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proactive enhancement and suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
Huang C; Donk M; Theeuwes J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 May; 48(5):443-457. PubMed ID: 35324244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
