These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36417171)

  • 1. Investigating the performance of level-specific fit indices in multilevel confirmatory factor analysis with dichotomous indicators: A Monte Carlo study.
    Lin JJH; Hsu HY
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4222-4259. PubMed ID: 36417171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Impact of Intraclass Correlation on the Effectiveness of Level-Specific Fit Indices in Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling: A Monte Carlo Study.
    Hsu HY; Lin JH; Kwok OM; Acosta S; Willson V
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Jan; 77(1):5-31. PubMed ID: 29795901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting Misspecified Multilevel Structural Equation Models with Common Fit Indices: A Monte Carlo Study.
    Hsu HY; Kwok OM; Lin JH; Acosta S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(2):197-215. PubMed ID: 26609878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating fit indices in a multilevel latent growth curve model: A Monte Carlo study.
    Hsu HY; Lin JJH; Skidmore ST; Kim M
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):172-194. PubMed ID: 30536150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Model Fit and Item Factor Analysis: Overfactoring, Underfactoring, and a Program to Guide Interpretation.
    Clark DA; Bowles RP
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(4):544-558. PubMed ID: 29683723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing the Performance of Level-Specific Fit Evaluation in MCFA Models With Different Factor Structures Across Levels.
    Lee B; Sohn W
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Dec; 82(6):1153-1179. PubMed ID: 36325122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Monte Carlo study comparing PIV, ULS and DWLS in the estimation of dichotomous confirmatory factor analysis.
    Nestler S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):127-43. PubMed ID: 22524532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. dynamic : An R Package for Deriving Dynamic Fit Index Cutoffs for Factor Analysis.
    Wolf MG; McNeish D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):189-194. PubMed ID: 36787513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multilevel Factor Analysis: Reporting Guidelines and a Review of Reporting Practices.
    Kim ES; Dedrick RF; Cao C; Ferron JM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(6):881-898. PubMed ID: 27754708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multilevel Heterogeneous Factor Analysis and Application to Ecological Momentary Assessment.
    Pan J; Ip EH; Dubé L
    Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):75-100. PubMed ID: 31758389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reconsidering the Conditions for Conducting Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
    Ondé D; Alvarado JM
    Span J Psychol; 2020 Dec; 23():e55. PubMed ID: 33272349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing Group Mean Differences of Latent Variables in Multilevel Data Using Multiple-Group Multilevel CFA and Multilevel MIMIC Modeling.
    Kim ES; Cao C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(4):436-56. PubMed ID: 26610156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: a cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices.
    Heene M; Hilbert S; Draxler C; Ziegler M; Bühner M
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Sep; 16(3):319-36. PubMed ID: 21843002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of two indices for the intraclass correlation coefficient.
    Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1212-23. PubMed ID: 22396135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of Not Addressing Partially Cross-Classified Multilevel Structure in Testing Measurement Invariance: A Monte Carlo Study.
    Im MH; Kim ES; Kwok OM; Yoon M; Willson VL
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():328. PubMed ID: 27047404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic fit index cutoffs for confirmatory factor analysis models.
    McNeish D; Wolf MG
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Feb; 28(1):61-88. PubMed ID: 34694832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework.
    Geldhof GJ; Preacher KJ; Zyphur MJ
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Mar; 19(1):72-91. PubMed ID: 23646988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The clustering effects of surfaces within the tooth and teeth within individuals.
    Masood M; Masood Y; Newton JT
    J Dent Res; 2015 Feb; 94(2):281-8. PubMed ID: 25421840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.