139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36417262)
1. Designing electronic graphic symbol-based AAC systems: a scoping review. Part 1: system description.
Tönsing KM; Bartram J; Morwane RE; Waller A
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; 19(3):1079-1091. PubMed ID: 36417262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Designing electronic graphic symbol-based AAC systems: a scoping review. Part 2: application of human-centred design.
Tönsing K; Bartram J; Morwane RE; Waller A
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; 19(3):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 36413429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The language and communication attributes of graphic symbol communication aids - a systematic review and narrative synthesis.
Judge S; Randall N; Goldbart J; Lynch Y; Moulam L; Meredith S; Murray J
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Aug; 15(6):652-662. PubMed ID: 31012746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Attributes of communication aids as described by those supporting children and young people with AAC.
Judge S; Murray J; Lynch Y; Meredith S; Moulam L; Randall N; Whittle H; Goldbart J
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 May; 58(3):910-928. PubMed ID: 36565242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Strategies in construction and interpretation of graphic-symbol sequences by individuals who use AAC systems.
Trudeau N; Sutton A; Morford JP; Côté-Giroux P; Pauzé AM; Vallée V
Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Dec; 26(4):299-312. PubMed ID: 21091304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning graphic symbols in two languages: Effects of monolingual teaching.
Tönsing KM; Dada S
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2023 Apr; 25(2):281-291. PubMed ID: 37139671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design and development of an AAC app based on a speech-to-symbol technology.
Radici E; Bonacina S; De Leo G
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():2574-2577. PubMed ID: 28268848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of environmental sounds on the guessability of animated graphic symbols.
Harmon AC; Schlosser RW; Gygi B; Shane HC; Kong YY; Book L; Macduff K; Hearn E
Augment Altern Commun; 2014 Dec; 30(4):298-313. PubMed ID: 25384797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Expressive and receptive performance with graphic symbol sentences by individuals who use aided communication.
Sutton A; Trudeau N; Morford JP; Smith MM; Mascolo MÈ
Augment Altern Commun; 2022 Sep; 38(3):135-147. PubMed ID: 35726671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of two approaches for representing AAC vocabulary for young children.
Worah S; McNaughton D; Light J; Benedek-Wood E
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2015; 17(5):460-9. PubMed ID: 25592055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An investigation of developmental changes in interpretation and construction of graphic AAC symbol sequences through systematic combination of input and output modalities.
Trudeau N; Sutton A; Morford JP
Augment Altern Commun; 2014 Sep; 30(3):187-99. PubMed ID: 25109228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Views of young people using augmentative and alternative communication systems.
Clarke M; McConachie H; Price K; Wood P
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2001; 36(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 11221427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Designing augmentative and alternative communication applications: the results of focus groups with speech-language pathologists and parents of children with autism spectrum disorder.
Boster JB; McCarthy JW
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 May; 13(4):353-365. PubMed ID: 28488902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the learnability and retention between Blissymbols and CyberGlyphs.
Alant E; Life H; Harty M
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2005; 40(2):151-69. PubMed ID: 16101272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of dynamic text in an AAC app on sight word reading for individuals with autism spectrum disorder.
Caron J; Light J; Holyfield C; McNaughton D
Augment Altern Commun; 2018 Jun; 34(2):143-154. PubMed ID: 29642715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech-Language pathologists' decisions when designing an aided AAC display for a compilation case study of a beginning communicator.
Thistle JJ; Wilkinson KM
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Nov; 16(8):871-879. PubMed ID: 32228265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reflections on Building a Multi-Country AAC Implementation Guide.
Draffan EA; Danger C; Banes D
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2023 Aug; 306():181-187. PubMed ID: 37638914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The availability and accessibility of basic concept vocabulary in AAC software: a preliminary study.
McCarthy JH; Schwarz I; Ashworth M
Augment Altern Commun; 2017 Sep; 33(3):131-138. PubMed ID: 28597688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Models and frameworks for guiding assessment for aided Augmentative and Alternative communication (AAC): a scoping review.
Burnham SPL; Finak P; Henderson JT; Gaurav N; Batorowicz B; Pinder SD; Davies TC
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 May; 19(4):1758-1772. PubMed ID: 37435920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptions of the design of voice output communication aids.
Judge S; Townend G
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(4):366-81. PubMed ID: 23889833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
