These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36418112)

  • 1. Angioscopic Comparison of Early- and Mid-Term Vascular Responses Following Treatment of ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction With Biodegradable vs. Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents　- A Prespecified Subanalysis of the MECHANISM AMI RCT.
    Nakatani S; Sotomi Y; Suzuki S; Kobayashi T; Hamanaka Y; Omatsu T; Ishida M; Kakizaki S; Otake H; Morino Y; Higuchi Y;
    Circ J; 2023 Apr; 87(5):619-628. PubMed ID: 36418112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of MECHANISM of early and late vascular responses following treatment of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction with two different everolimus-eluting stents: a randomized controlled trial of biodegradable versus durable polymer stents.
    Otake H; Ishida M; Nakano S; Higuchi Y; Hibi K; Kuriyama N; Iwasaki M; Kataoka T; Kubo T; Tsujita K; Ashikaga T; Shinke T; Itoh T; Kimura T; Morino Y;
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2023 Jan; 38(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 35896895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.
    Zbinden R; Piccolo R; Heg D; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Muller O; Vuilliomenet A; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Jamshidi P; Franzone A; Eberli F; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Mar; 5(3):e003255. PubMed ID: 26979080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biodegradable- Versus Durable-Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents for STEMI: Final 2-Year Outcomes of the BIOSTEMI Trial.
    Pilgrim T; Muller O; Heg D; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Moarof I; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Tapponnier M; Losdat S; Eeckhout E; Valgimigli M; Jüni P; Windecker S; Iglesias JF
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Mar; 14(6):639-648. PubMed ID: 33727005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).
    Vlachojannis GJ; Smits PC; Hofma SH; Togni M; Vázquez N; Valdés M; Voudris V; Slagboom T; Goy JJ; den Heijer P; van der Ent M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(12):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 28579236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
    Iglesias JF; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Lanz J; Rigamonti F; Muller O; Moarof I; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Cuculi F; Valgimigli M; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Nov; 8(22):e013607. PubMed ID: 31696762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complex primary percutaneous coronary intervention with ultrathin-strut biodegradable versus thin-strut durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A subgroup analysis from the BIOSTEMI randomized trial.
    Iglesias JF; Muller O; Losdat S; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Heg D; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Mar; 101(4):687-700. PubMed ID: 36807456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention with thin-strut biodegradable versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A subgroup analysis of the BIOSTEMI randomized trial.
    Iglesias JF; Muller O; Losdat S; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Heg D; Valgimigli M; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    Int J Cardiol; 2021 Jul; 334():37-41. PubMed ID: 33887341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biodegradable polymer-coated thin strut sirolimus- -eluting stent versus durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in the diabetic population.
    Gasior P; Gierlotka M; Szczurek-Katanski K; Osuch M; Roleder M; Hawranek M; Wojakowski W; Polonski L
    Cardiol J; 2021; 28(2):235-243. PubMed ID: 31909473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unselected Use of Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Coronary Revascularization.
    Yamaji K; Zanchin T; Zanchin C; Stortecky S; Koskinas KC; Hunziker L; Praz F; Blöchlinger S; Moro C; Moschovitis A; Seiler C; Valgimigli M; Billinger M; Pilgrim T; Heg D; Windecker S; Räber L
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(9):e006741. PubMed ID: 30354590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial.
    Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 13(11):1343-1353. PubMed ID: 32499026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Very early neointimal coverage of new biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent evaluated by optical frequency domain imaging.
    Kobayashi N; Ito Y; Yamawaki M; Araki M; Sakai T; Sakamoto Y; Mori S; Tsutsumi M; Nauchi M; Honda Y; Tokuda T; Makino K; Shirai S; Hirano K
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):515-522. PubMed ID: 29159531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: BIOFLOW V Final 5-Year Outcomes.
    Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Sep; 15(18):1852-1860. PubMed ID: 36137689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BIOSTEMI): a single-blind, prospective, randomised superiority trial.
    Iglesias JF; Muller O; Heg D; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Moarof I; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Tapponnier M; Stortecky S; Losdat S; Eeckhout E; Valgimigli M; Odutayo A; Zwahlen M; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    Lancet; 2019 Oct; 394(10205):1243-1253. PubMed ID: 31488372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 1-Month and 12-Month Vessel Responses Between the Polymer-Free Biolimus A9-Coated Stent and the Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent.
    Ishihara T; Mizote I; Nakamura D; Okamoto N; Shiraki T; Itaya N; Tsujimura T; Takahara M; Nakayoshi T; Iida O; Hata Y; Nishino M; Ueno T; Nakatani D; Hikoso S; Nanto S; Mano T; Sakata Y;
    Circ J; 2022 Aug; 86(9):1397-1408. PubMed ID: 35660701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Calcified or Small Vessel Lesions.
    Dan K; Garcia-Garcia HM; Kolm P; Windecker S; Saito S; Kandzari DE; Waksman R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Sep; 13(9):e009189. PubMed ID: 32895004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of an ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale and design of the BIOSTEMI trial.
    Iglesias JF; Muller O; Zaugg S; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Vuilliomenet A; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Tapponnier M; Heg D; Valgimigli M; Eeckhout E; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    EuroIntervention; 2018 Aug; 14(6):692-699. PubMed ID: 29205157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of coronary angioscopic findings 8 months after stent implantation between two kinds of biodegradable polymer-coated and one durable polymer-coated drug-eluting stent.
    Yasumura K; Shutta R; Matsunaga-Lee Y; Nakamura D; Yano M; Yamato M; Egami Y; Sakata Y; Nishino M; Tanouchi J
    Coron Artery Dis; 2021 Mar; 32(2):91-95. PubMed ID: 32976243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.
    Roguin A; Kandzari DE; Marcusohn E; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JM; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(10):e007331. PubMed ID: 30354631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
    Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 72(25):3287-3297. PubMed ID: 30257191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.