These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36420047)
1. A Comparative Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness of Two Different Bonding Adhesives After Debonding With Atomic Force Microscopy. Doddavarapu S; K B; Singaraju GS; Yamini Priyanka JS; Vivek Reddy G; Mandava P Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31661. PubMed ID: 36420047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study. Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):478. PubMed ID: 37443027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study. Fan XC; Chen L; Huang XF BMC Oral Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28241812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system. Ghaleb L; Al-Worafi NA; Thawaba A; Abdulqader AA; Alkamel A; Abdo Y; Yang Z; Noman N; Al-Aroomi MA; Yulou T BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):358. PubMed ID: 38509532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding: A Comparative Study using Three Different Burs. Garg R; Dixit P; Khosla T; Gupta P; Kalra H; Kumar P J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):521-526. PubMed ID: 29807961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study. Summers A; Kao E; Gilmore J; Gunel E; Ngan P Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):200-6; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Onto the Tooth Enamel of 120 Freshly Extracted Adult Bovine Medial Lower Incisors Using 4 Adhesives: A Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Adhesive, a Composite Adhesive, a Liquid Composite Adhesive, and a One-Step Light-Cured Adhesive. Prylińska-Czyżewska A; Maciejewska-Szaniec Z; Olszewska A; Polichnowska M; Grabarek BO; Dudek D; Sobański D; Czajka-Jakubowska A Med Sci Monit; 2022 Dec; 28():e938867. PubMed ID: 36540003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enamel surface roughness evaluation after bracket debonding: Comparison between light cure and self cure adhesive resin 3-Dimensional profilometric study. Chandrasekharan D; Sourabh C; Deenadayalan ; Praveen K Indian J Dent Res; 2022; 33(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 35946250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of fluoride-releasing orthodontic adhesives on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to eroded enamel following different surface treatment protocols. Althagafi NM J Orthod Sci; 2022; 11():3. PubMed ID: 35282290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Influence of Various Adhesive Systems and Polishing Methods on Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets: A Three-Dimensional In Vitro Evaluation. Křivková T; Tichý A; Tycová H; Kučera J Materials (Basel); 2023 Jul; 16(14):. PubMed ID: 37512378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur. Soares Tenório KC; Neupmann Feres MF; Tanaka CJ; Augusto MKM; Rodrigues JA; Pereira da Silva HD; Arana-Chavez VE; Roscoe MG Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):546-554. PubMed ID: 32493624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets. Movahhed HZ; Ogaard B; Syverud M Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 16043469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement]. Sorel O; el Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G Orthod Fr; 2000 Apr; 71(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 10916640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives. Sharma S; Tandon P; Nagar A; Singh GP; Singh A; Chugh VK J Orthod Sci; 2014 Apr; 3(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 24987660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]