These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36420253)

  • 41. A world without Roe: how different would it be?
    Glendon MA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 2745061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. 25 years after Roe: new technological parameters for an old debate.
    Cohen SA
    Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1998 Feb; 1(1):5, 12. PubMed ID: 12321448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Induced termination of pregnancy before and after Roe v Wade. Trends in the mortality and morbidity of women. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association.
    JAMA; 1992 Dec; 268(22):3231-9. PubMed ID: 1433765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Life after Roe v. Wade.
    Bauerlein M
    Utne Read; 1992; ():17-20. PubMed ID: 12343822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A legal strategy to overturn Roe v. Wade after Webster: some lessons from Lincoln.
    Forsythe CD
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):519-60. PubMed ID: 11656174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
    Koslov TI
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Vasectomy interest and awareness among patients and their partners in prenatal clinics in the United States.
    Guo XM; Lore M; Madrigal J; Kiley J; Zumpf K; Adam M; Patel A
    BMJ Sex Reprod Health; 2022 Jan; 48(e1):e67-e74. PubMed ID: 34272208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Changes in Permanent Contraception Procedures Among Young Adults Following the Dobbs Decision.
    Ellison JE; Brown-Podgorski BL; Morgan JR
    JAMA Health Forum; 2024 Apr; 5(4):e240424. PubMed ID: 38607642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. State implementation of supreme court decision: abortion rates since Roe v. Wade.
    Hansen SB
    J Polit; 1980; 42(2):372-95. PubMed ID: 11632325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. What the U.S. Constitution says. The law and abortion.
    Liben P
    Freedom Rev; 1995; 26(5):20-1. PubMed ID: 12346849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. For women, abortion can't be the whole story.
    Beck J
    Sun; 1992 Apr; ():13A. PubMed ID: 12343688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law.
    Morgan RG
    Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Abortion USA.
    Lancet; 1989 Apr; 1(8643):879-80. PubMed ID: 2564953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Roe v. Wade. Jane's perspective.
    Kaplan L
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):27-8. PubMed ID: 12178883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Closing the circle of constitutional review from Griswold v. Connecticut to Roe v. Wade: an outline of a decision merely overruling Roe.
    Van Alstyne W
    Duke Law J; 1989 Dec; 1989(6):1677-88. PubMed ID: 11656009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The long road of eugenics: from Rockefeller to Roe v. Wade.
    Messall R
    Hum Life Rev; 2004; 30(4):33-74. PubMed ID: 15856597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Implications of the Supreme Court Decision to Overturn Roe v Wade for Women With Pregnancy-Associated Cancers.
    Silverstein J; Van Loon K
    JAMA Oncol; 2022 Oct; 8(10):1394-1395. PubMed ID: 35951314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.
    Baron CH
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2628652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Oct; 321(17):1200-3. PubMed ID: 2677728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.