134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36421775)
1. Fuzzy Logic as a Strategy for Combining Marker Statistics to Optimize Preselection of High-Density and Sequence Genotype Data.
Ling A; Hay EH; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
Genes (Basel); 2022 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 36421775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dissection of the impact of prioritized QTL-linked and -unlinked SNP markers on the accuracy of genomic selection
Ling AS; Hay EH; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
BMC Genom Data; 2021 Aug; 22(1):26. PubMed ID: 34380418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increasing accuracy of genomic selection in presence of high density marker panels through the prioritization of relevant polymorphisms.
Chang LY; Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
BMC Genet; 2019 Feb; 20(1):21. PubMed ID: 30795734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-omics-data-assisted genomic feature markers preselection improves the accuracy of genomic prediction.
Ye S; Li J; Zhang Z
J Anim Sci Biotechnol; 2020 Dec; 11(1):109. PubMed ID: 33292577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs.
Grossi DA; Brito LF; Jafarikia M; Schenkel FS; Feng Z
Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2235-2245. PubMed ID: 29706144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-Throughput Sequencing With the Preselection of Markers Is a Good Alternative to SNP Chips for Genomic Prediction in Broilers.
Liu T; Luo C; Ma J; Wang Y; Shu D; Su G; Qu H
Front Genet; 2020; 11():108. PubMed ID: 32174971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa.
Aliloo H; Mrode R; Okeyo AM; Ni G; Goddard ME; Gibson JP
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):9108-9127. PubMed ID: 30077450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing strategies for selection of low-density SNPs for imputation-mediated genomic prediction in U. S. Holsteins.
He J; Xu J; Wu XL; Bauck S; Lee J; Morota G; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
Genetica; 2018 Apr; 146(2):137-149. PubMed ID: 29243001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Avoiding preselection bias in subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluations of genomically preselected animals.
Jibrila I; Vandenplas J; Ten Napel J; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
J Anim Breed Genet; 2021 Jul; 138(4):432-441. PubMed ID: 33372707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using imputation-based whole-genome sequencing data to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for combined populations in pigs.
Song H; Ye S; Jiang Y; Zhang Z; Zhang Q; Ding X
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Oct; 51(1):58. PubMed ID: 31638889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tag-SNP selection using Bayesian genomewide association study for growth traits in Hereford and Braford cattle.
Campos GS; Sollero BP; Reimann FA; Junqueira VS; Cardoso LL; Yokoo MJI; Boligon AA; Braccini J; Cardoso FF
J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 Sep; 137(5):449-467. PubMed ID: 31777136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic prediction in a numerically small breed population using prioritized genetic markers from whole-genome sequence data.
Moghaddar N; Brown DJ; Swan AA; Gurman PM; Li L; van der Werf JH
J Anim Breed Genet; 2022 Jan; 139(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 34374454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic selection using low density marker panels with application to a sire line in pigs.
Wellmann R; Preuß S; Tholen E; Heinkel J; Wimmers K; Bennewitz J
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):28. PubMed ID: 23895218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
