131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36422782)
1. Does location of the households' matters? Identifying the households' willingness to pay and preference heterogeneity in advancement of vulnerable ecosystem services: An approach of choice experiment.
Ali MAS; Zhang Z; Khan SU; Khan AA; Musa M; Rahman P; Hayat Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(11):29859-29873. PubMed ID: 36422782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial prioritization of willingness to pay for ecosystem services. A novel notion of distance from origin's impression.
Khan SU; Liu G; Zhao M; Chien H; Lu Q; Khan AA; Ali MAS; Misbahullah
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(3):3100-3112. PubMed ID: 31838703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services: a distance decay approach to quantify willingness to pay for improvements in Heihe River Basin ecosystems.
Khan SU; Khan I; Zhao M; Chien H; Lu Q; Ali MAS; Khan AA; Fahad S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Aug; 26(24):25247-25261. PubMed ID: 31256403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prioritizing stakeholders' preferences for policy scenarios of vulnerable ecosystems with spatial heterogeneity in choice experiment: Coupling stated preferences with elevation.
Khan A; Khan SU; Ali MAS; Khan AA; Zhao M
J Environ Manage; 2022 May; 310():114757. PubMed ID: 35220093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ecological degradation of an inland river basin and an evaluation of the spatial and distance effect on willingness to pay for its improvement.
Khan I; Zhao M; Khan SU
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Nov; 25(31):31474-31485. PubMed ID: 30203347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying the spatial preferences heterogeneity to upgrade the endemic ecological attributes for a cleaner environment: Evaluating the feasibility of benefit transfer among sub-basins of an inland river.
Ali MAS; Yi L; Khan SU; Khan AA; Musa M; Yang L
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Nov; 29(52):79357-79374. PubMed ID: 35708806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Valuation of ecosystem services using choice experiment with preference heterogeneity: A benefit transfer analysis across inland river basin.
Khan SU; Khan I; Zhao M; Khan AA; Ali MAS
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Aug; 679():126-135. PubMed ID: 31082587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do residential localities matter? Revisiting preference heterogeneity and ranking of ecological attributes of an inland river basin.
Khan I; Lei H; Muhammad I; Zhao M
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Apr; 763():142970. PubMed ID: 33121777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Water resource management and public preferences for water ecosystem services: A choice experiment approach for inland river basin management.
Khan I; Zhao M
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 646():821-831. PubMed ID: 30064108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ranking of ecosystem services on the basis of willingness to pay: Monetary assessment of a subset of ecosystem services in the Heihe River basin.
Ali MAS; Khan SU; Khan A; Khan AA; Zhao M
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Sep; 734():139447. PubMed ID: 32464395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring the spatial heterogeneity of individual preferences for integrated river basin management: an example of Heihe river basin.
Khan I; Khan SU; Zhao M; Khan AA
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(7):6911-6921. PubMed ID: 30644048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychological distance and physical distance induced residents' heterogeneous willingness to pay for transboundary watershed ecosystem services in the Wei River Basin, China.
Shi Y; Li C; Zhao M; Ni Q
Environ Manage; 2023 Dec; 72(6):1259-1276. PubMed ID: 37402887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Partial attribute attendance in environmental choice experiments: A comparative case study between Guangzhou (China) and Brussels (Belgium).
Hua J; Chen WY; Liekens I; Cho FHT
J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 285():112107. PubMed ID: 33561727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Heterogeneous public preferences for controlling agricultural non-point source pollution based on a choice experiment.
Li XP; Cai J; Wang QJ; Wang XW
J Environ Manage; 2022 Mar; 305():114413. PubMed ID: 34991025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Public Attitudes, Preferences and Willingness to Pay for River Ecosystem Services.
Khan I; Lei H; Ali G; Ali S; Zhao M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31581565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptions of ecosystem services, disservices and willingness-to-pay for urban green space conservation.
Tian Y; Wu H; Zhang G; Wang L; Zheng D; Li S
J Environ Manage; 2020 Apr; 260():110140. PubMed ID: 32090834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring preference and willingness for rural water pollution control: A choice experiment approach incorporating extended theory of planned behaviour.
Mu L; Mou M; Tang H; Gao S
J Environ Manage; 2023 Apr; 332():117408. PubMed ID: 36731418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating the Economic Values of Restricted Monoculture
Tesfaw A; Senbeta F; Alemu D; Teferi E
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 35897444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Willingness to pay for ecosystem services of urban river in Shanghai].
Zhao J; Yang K; Tai J; Wu EN
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2005 Mar; 26(2):5-10. PubMed ID: 16004291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Households' preferences for hydrological services in Veracruz, Mexico: The importance of outcomes vs. program design.
McGinnis I; Atallah SS; Huang JC
J Environ Manage; 2021 Dec; 300():113763. PubMed ID: 34649329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
