These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36424012)

  • 1. Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure and Wide QRS Patients: LEVEL-AT Trial.
    Pujol-Lopez M; Jiménez-Arjona R; Garre P; Guasch E; Borràs R; Doltra A; Ferró E; García-Ribas C; Niebla M; Carro E; Puente JL; Vázquez-Calvo S; Invers-Rubio E; Roca-Luque I; Castel MÁ; Arbelo E; Sitges M; Brugada J; Tolosana JM; Mont L
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 Nov; 8(11):1431-1445. PubMed ID: 36424012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of conduction system pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: A multicenter experience.
    Ezzeddine FM; Pistiolis SM; Pujol-Lopez M; Lavelle M; Wan EY; Patton KK; Robinson M; Lador A; Tamirisa K; Karim S; Linde C; Parkash R; Birgersdotter-Green U; Russo AM; Chung M; Cha YM
    Heart Rhythm; 2023 Jun; 20(6):863-871. PubMed ID: 36842610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
    Wang Y; Zhu H; Hou X; Wang Z; Zou F; Qian Z; Wei Y; Wang X; Zhang L; Li X; Liu Z; Xue S; Qin C; Zeng J; Li H; Wu H; Ma H; Ellenbogen KA; Gold MR; Fan X; Zou J;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2022 Sep; 80(13):1205-1216. PubMed ID: 36137670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kim JA; Kim SE; Ellenbogen KA; Vijayaraman P; Chelu MG
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Aug; 34(8):1718-1729. PubMed ID: 37343033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex Differences in Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
    Tedrow UB; Miranda-Arboleda AF; Sauer WH; Duque M; Koplan BA; Marín JE; Aristizabal JM; Niño CD; Bastidas O; Martinez JM; Hincapie D; Hoyos C; Matos CD; Lopez-Cabanillas N; Steiger NA; Tadros TM; Zei PC; Diaz JC; Romero JE
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2024 Jul; 10(7 Pt 2):1736-1749. PubMed ID: 38842969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparisons of long-term clinical outcomes with left bundle branch pacing, left ventricular septal pacing, and biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Zhu H; Qin C; Du A; Wang Q; He C; Zou F; Li X; Tao J; Wang C; Liu Z; Xue S; Zeng J; Qian Z; Wang Y; Hou X; Ellenbogen KA; Gold MR; Yao Y; Zou J; Fan X
    Heart Rhythm; 2024 Aug; 21(8):1342-1353. PubMed ID: 38461922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of physiologic pacing versus right ventricular pacing among patients with left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 35%: A systematic review for the 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.
    Slotwiner DJ; Raitt MH; Del-Carpio Munoz F; Mulpuru SK; Nasser N; Peterson PN
    Heart Rhythm; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e280-e298. PubMed ID: 30412776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conduction System Pacing Versus Conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Congenital Heart Disease.
    Moore JP; de Groot NMS; O'Connor M; Cortez D; Su J; Burrows A; Shannon KM; O'Leary ET; Shah M; Khairy P; Atallah J; Wong T; Lloyd MS; Taverne YJHJ; Dubin AM; Nielsen JC; Evertz R; Czosek RJ; Madhavan M; Chang PM; Aydin A; Cano Ó
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 Mar; 9(3):385-393. PubMed ID: 36752449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved all-cause mortality with left bundle branch area pacing compared to biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a meta-analysis.
    Diaz JC; Gabr M; Tedrow UB; Duque M; Aristizabal J; Marin J; Niño C; Bastidas O; Koplan BA; Hoyos C; Matos CD; Hincapie D; Pacheco-Barrios K; Alviz I; Steiger NA; Kapur S; Tadros TM; Zei PC; Sauer WH; Romero JE
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2024 Sep; 67(6):1463-1476. PubMed ID: 38668934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.
    Hua J; Chen Y; Yu J; Xiong Q; Xia Z; Xia Z; Huang Q; Kong Q; Chen H; Zhang Y; Hu J; Li J; Hu J; Chen Q; Hong K
    Heart Vessels; 2022 Jul; 37(7):1162-1174. PubMed ID: 35088204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biventricular or Conduction System Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization Based on a Hybrid Approach.
    Santoro A; Landra F; Marallo C; Taddeucci S; Sisti N; Pica A; Stefanini A; Tavera MC; Pagliaro A; Baiocchi C; Cameli M
    J Cardiovasc Dev Dis; 2023 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 37103048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing: Reduced repolarization heterogeneity in addition to improved depolarization.
    Gupta A; Pavri BB
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Feb; 33(2):287-295. PubMed ID: 34911154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing as Initial Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization.
    Diaz JC; Sauer WH; Duque M; Koplan BA; Braunstein ED; Marín JE; Aristizabal J; Niño CD; Bastidas O; Martinez JM; Hoyos C; Matos CD; Lopez-Cabanillas N; Steiger NA; Kapur S; Tadros TM; Martin DT; Zei PC; Tedrow UB; Romero JE
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 Aug; 9(8 Pt 2):1568-1581. PubMed ID: 37212761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Vijayaraman P; Zalavadia D; Haseeb A; Dye C; Madan N; Skeete JR; Vipparthy SC; Young W; Ravi V; Rajakumar C; Pokharel P; Larsen T; Huang HD; Storm RH; Oren JW; Batul SA; Trohman RG; Subzposh FA; Sharma PS
    Heart Rhythm; 2022 Aug; 19(8):1263-1271. PubMed ID: 35500791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conduction system pacing upgrade
    Pei-Pei M; Ying C; Yi-Heng Y; Guo-Cao L; Cheng-Ming M; Qing F; Lian-Jun G; Yun-Long X; Ying-Xue D
    Front Physiol; 2024; 15():1355696. PubMed ID: 39108542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative electromechanical and hemodynamic effects of left ventricular and biventricular pacing in dyssynchronous heart failure: electrical resynchronization versus left-right ventricular interaction.
    Lumens J; Ploux S; Strik M; Gorcsan J; Cochet H; Derval N; Strom M; Ramanathan C; Ritter P; Haïssaguerre M; Jaïs P; Arts T; Delhaas T; Prinzen FW; Bordachar P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 62(25):2395-2403. PubMed ID: 24013057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longitudinal comparison of dyssynchrony correction and 'strain' improvement by conduction system pacing: LEVEL-AT trial secondary findings.
    Pujol-López M; Jiménez-Arjona R; Garcia-Ribas C; Borràs R; Guasch E; Regany-Closa M; Graterol FR; Niebla M; Carro E; Roca-Luque I; Guichard JB; Castel MÁ; Arbelo E; Porta-Sánchez A; Brugada J; Sitges M; Tolosana JM; Doltra A; Mont L
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Sep; 25(10):1394-1404. PubMed ID: 38768299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Left Ventricular Septal Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
    Diaz JC; Tedrow UB; Duque M; Aristizabal J; Braunstein ED; Marin J; Niño C; Bastidas O; Lopez Cabanillas N; Koplan BA; Hoyos C; Matos CD; Hincapie D; Velasco A; Steiger NA; Kapur S; Tadros TM; Zei PC; Sauer WH; Romero JE
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2024 Feb; 10(2):295-305. PubMed ID: 38127008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Ferreira Felix I; Collini M; Fonseca R; Guida C; Armaganijan L; Healey JS; Carvalho G
    Heart Rhythm; 2024 Jun; 21(6):881-889. PubMed ID: 38382686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients with mid-range ejection fraction.
    Tang J; Kong NW; Beaser A; Aziz Z; Yeshwant S; Ozcan C; Tung R; Upadhyay GA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39153133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.