These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36424703)
1. Comparison of the safety between cervical conization and hysterectomy for patients with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ. Liu J; Wang Y; Wan X; Zou J; Zhu Y; Lv W; Shen Y J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 34(1):e8. PubMed ID: 36424703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Risk stratified management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ based on cone margin state]. Huang SS; Sui L; Chen LM; Zhang HW; Tao X Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 56(9):622-629. PubMed ID: 34547863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical significance of loop electrosurgical excisional procedure in diagnosis and treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ and invasive cervical adenocarcinoma]. Song Y; Wang Q; Sui L; Gao SJ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):178-182. PubMed ID: 29609232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Follow-up of women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ treated by conization: A single centre clinical experience. Adolph L; Mann A; Liu XQ; Roberts L; Robinson C; Popowich S; Dean E; Kean S; Fischer G; Altman AD Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Aug; 187():74-79. PubMed ID: 38733955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens. Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk for residual adenocarcinoma in situ or cervical adenocarcinoma in women undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure/conization for adenocarcinoma in situ. DeSimone CP; Day ME; Dietrich CS; Tovar MM; Modesitt SC J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(9-10):376-80. PubMed ID: 22010519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of persistent or recurrent cervical neoplasia in patients with 'pure' adenocarcinoma-in-situ (AIS) or mixed AIS and high-grade cervical squamous neoplasia (cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 (CIN 2/3)): a population-based study. Codde E; Munro A; Stewart C; Spilsbury K; Bowen S; Codde J; Steel N; Leung Y; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Mohan GR; Cohen PA BJOG; 2018 Jan; 125(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28678394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical outcomes of patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix treated by conization. Taylor JS; Panico V; Caputo T; Gerber D; Gupta D; Pirog E; Holcomb K Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 25556268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Relationship between various histological status of margins of LEEP and residual HSIL or worse at hysterectomy following conization]. Xiao YP; Tao X; Zhao CY; Qu YQ; Xie F; Ning Y Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 30695901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy. Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses. Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting residual lesion in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ after cone excisional biopsy. Srisomboon J; Kietpeerakool C; Suprasert P; Siriaunkgul S; Khunamornpong S; Prompittayarat W Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 17696736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management and long-term outcomes of women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: A retrospective study. Tan JHJ; Malloy MJ; Thangamani R; Gertig D; Drennan KT; Wrede CD; Saville M; Quinn M Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Feb; 60(1):123-129. PubMed ID: 31578727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins. Diaz ES; Aoyama C; Baquing MA; Beavis A; Silva E; Holschneider C; Cass I Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24262876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer. Wong AS; Li WH; Cheung TH Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adequacy of conization margins in adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix as a predictor of residual disease. Im DD; Duska LR; Rosenshein NB Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Nov; 59(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 7590468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Triage for management of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin by conization: a retrospective analysis. Dou Y; Zhang X; Li Y; Wang F; Xie X; Wang X Front Med; 2017 Jun; 11(2):223-228. PubMed ID: 28488232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conservative management of stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with positive resection margins after conization. Kim WY; Chang SJ; Chang KH; Yoo SC; Ryu HS Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 May; 109(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 20096835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of Conservative Surgical Treatment and Prognosis of Microinvasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Stage IA1: Results of Follow-Up to 20 Years. Hartman CA; Teixeira JC; Barbosa SB; Figueiredo SM; Andrade LA; Bastos JF Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):357-363. PubMed ID: 27984378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]