144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36424703)
1. Comparison of the safety between cervical conization and hysterectomy for patients with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
Liu J; Wang Y; Wan X; Zou J; Zhu Y; Lv W; Shen Y
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 34(1):e8. PubMed ID: 36424703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Risk stratified management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ based on cone margin state].
Huang SS; Sui L; Chen LM; Zhang HW; Tao X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 56(9):622-629. PubMed ID: 34547863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical significance of loop electrosurgical excisional procedure in diagnosis and treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ and invasive cervical adenocarcinoma].
Song Y; Wang Q; Sui L; Gao SJ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):178-182. PubMed ID: 29609232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk for residual adenocarcinoma in situ or cervical adenocarcinoma in women undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure/conization for adenocarcinoma in situ.
DeSimone CP; Day ME; Dietrich CS; Tovar MM; Modesitt SC
J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(9-10):376-80. PubMed ID: 22010519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk of persistent or recurrent cervical neoplasia in patients with 'pure' adenocarcinoma-in-situ (AIS) or mixed AIS and high-grade cervical squamous neoplasia (cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 (CIN 2/3)): a population-based study.
Codde E; Munro A; Stewart C; Spilsbury K; Bowen S; Codde J; Steel N; Leung Y; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Mohan GR; Cohen PA
BJOG; 2018 Jan; 125(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28678394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical outcomes of patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix treated by conization.
Taylor JS; Panico V; Caputo T; Gerber D; Gupta D; Pirog E; Holcomb K
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 25556268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Relationship between various histological status of margins of LEEP and residual HSIL or worse at hysterectomy following conization].
Xiao YP; Tao X; Zhao CY; Qu YQ; Xie F; Ning Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 30695901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors affecting residual lesion in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ after cone excisional biopsy.
Srisomboon J; Kietpeerakool C; Suprasert P; Siriaunkgul S; Khunamornpong S; Prompittayarat W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 17696736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management and long-term outcomes of women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: A retrospective study.
Tan JHJ; Malloy MJ; Thangamani R; Gertig D; Drennan KT; Wrede CD; Saville M; Quinn M
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Feb; 60(1):123-129. PubMed ID: 31578727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins.
Diaz ES; Aoyama C; Baquing MA; Beavis A; Silva E; Holschneider C; Cass I
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24262876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.
Wong AS; Li WH; Cheung TH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adequacy of conization margins in adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix as a predictor of residual disease.
Im DD; Duska LR; Rosenshein NB
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Nov; 59(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 7590468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Triage for management of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin by conization: a retrospective analysis.
Dou Y; Zhang X; Li Y; Wang F; Xie X; Wang X
Front Med; 2017 Jun; 11(2):223-228. PubMed ID: 28488232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conservative management of stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with positive resection margins after conization.
Kim WY; Chang SJ; Chang KH; Yoo SC; Ryu HS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 May; 109(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 20096835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of Conservative Surgical Treatment and Prognosis of Microinvasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Stage IA1: Results of Follow-Up to 20 Years.
Hartman CA; Teixeira JC; Barbosa SB; Figueiredo SM; Andrade LA; Bastos JF
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):357-363. PubMed ID: 27984378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of cervical conization as a definitive treatment for microinvasive cervical carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Takeda N; Suzuki T; Suzuki M; Matsuura M; Tanaka R; Fujii M; Ito E; Saito T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):453-7. PubMed ID: 21681515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
