These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36425288)

  • 1. Outlier Detection Using t-test in Rasch IRT Equating under NEAT Design.
    Liu C; Jurich D
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Jan; 47(1):34-47. PubMed ID: 36425288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of Sampling Variance of Item Response Theory Parameter Estimates in Detecting Outliers in Common Item Equating.
    Liu C; Jurich D
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Sep; 46(6):529-547. PubMed ID: 35991825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating Robust Scale Transformation Methods With Multiple Outlying Common Items Under IRT True Score Equating.
    He Y; Cui Z
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 44(4):296-310. PubMed ID: 32536731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New Robust Scale Transformation Methods in the Presence of Outlying Common Items.
    He Y; Cui Z; Osterlind SJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Nov; 39(8):613-626. PubMed ID: 29881031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficiency Analysis of Item Response Theory Kernel Equating for Mixed-Format Tests.
    Wallmark J; Josefsson M; Wiberg M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Nov; 47(7-8):496-512. PubMed ID: 38027462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian Robust IRT Outlier-Detection Model.
    Öztürk NK; Karabatsos G
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 May; 41(3):195-208. PubMed ID: 29881088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of proficiency in an anesthesiology course across distinct medical student cohorts: psychometric approaches to test equating.
    Liao SW; Chang KY; Ting CK; Tsou MY; Chen ET; Chan KH; Chang WK
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 77(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 24290232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing screening approaches to investigate stability of common items in Rasch equating.
    Arce-Ferrer AJ
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 18180550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The NEAT Equating Via Chaining Random Forests in the Context of Small Sample Sizes: A Machine-Learning Method.
    Jiang Z; Han Y; Xu L; Shi D; Liu R; Ouyang J; Cai F
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Oct; 83(5):984-1006. PubMed ID: 37663533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between robust z and 0.3-Logit Difference procedures in assessing stability of linking items for the Rasch model.
    Huynh H; Rawls A
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 22089507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of IRT Observed Score Kernel Equating and Several Equating Methods.
    Wang S; Zhang M; You S
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():308. PubMed ID: 32210877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Equating Errors and Scale Drift in Linked-Chain IRT Equating with Mixed-Format Tests.
    Hu B
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 29561741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparative Evaluation of Kernel Equating and Test Characteristic Curve Equating.
    De Ayala RJ; Smith B; Norman Dvorak R
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Mar; 42(2):155-168. PubMed ID: 29881117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linking of Rasch-Scaled Tests: Consequences of Limited Item Pools and Model Misfit.
    Fischer L; Rohm T; Carstensen CH; Gnambs T
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():633896. PubMed ID: 34295279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Item Response Theory Observed-Score Kernel Equating.
    Andersson B; Wiberg M
    Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 27743280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical Consequences of Item Response Theory Model Misfit in the Context of Test Equating with Mixed-Format Test Data.
    Zhao Y; Hambleton RK
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():484. PubMed ID: 28421011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating Different Equating Setups in the Continuous Item Pool Calibration for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Born S; Fink A; Spoden C; Frey A
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1277. PubMed ID: 31244717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Review of the Effects on IRT Item Parameter Estimates with a Focus on Misbehaving Common Items in Test Equating.
    Michaelides MP
    Front Psychol; 2010; 1():167. PubMed ID: 21833230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of Levels of Discrimination on Vertical Equating in the Rasch Model.
    Humphrey SN
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(3):216-228. PubMed ID: 30169331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Approach to Scoring and Equating Tests With Binary Items: Piloting With Large-Scale Assessments.
    Dimitrov DM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Dec; 76(6):954-975. PubMed ID: 29795895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.