These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3642625)

  • 21. Using results to rate performance.
    English JW; Gottesman JI
    Health Serv Manager; 1980 Oct; 13(10):7-8. PubMed ID: 10248518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development of a model performance appraisal system.
    Lemay AP; Mull V
    Top Hosp Pharm Manage; 1988 May; 8(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 10314287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Appraisal schemes could do better.
    Watson J
    Health Soc Serv J; 1983 Oct; 93(4870):1288-9. PubMed ID: 10263806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Getting the most out of performance appraisals.
    Gubman EL
    Manage Rev; 1984 Nov; 73(11):44-8. PubMed ID: 10269466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Evaluation of the work of the teacher].
    Frolov SS
    Voen Med Zh; 1988 Aug; (8):19-22. PubMed ID: 3195089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Performance review guidelines revisited.
    Zielski K
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 Feb; 37(2):76-7. PubMed ID: 10315281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Developing performance-appraisal systems.
    Ross SR
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1984 Aug; 41(8):1567-73. PubMed ID: 6475976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Performance appraisal, 1: Risks and rewards.
    Romberg RV
    Personnel; 1986 Aug; 63(8):20-6. PubMed ID: 10278732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. MJS: management by job standards.
    Hoffman RR
    Pers J; 1979 Aug; 58(8):536-40, 555. PubMed ID: 10243304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reviewing performance appraisal policies can lead to improved worker health.
    Rosen RH
    Bus Health; 1984 Sep; 1(9):54. PubMed ID: 10267658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Telling subordinates what to do and how to do it.
    English JW; Gottesman JI
    Superv Manage; 1979 Jul; 24(7):21-4. PubMed ID: 10242789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Health care manager's notebook: performance appraisals.
    Hengesbach J; Buschmohle MJ
    Hosp Forum; 1981; 24(6):45-8. PubMed ID: 10253069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Failed criteria: a verdict on the job evaluation document.
    Jacob D
    Nurs Times; 1977 Oct; 73(41):1579. PubMed ID: 928090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance appraisal, 2: Improving the rater's effectiveness.
    Martin DC
    Personnel; 1986 Aug; 63(8):28-33. PubMed ID: 10278733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Staff development. Appraisals reassessed.
    Watson J
    Health Soc Serv J; 1984 Jun; 94(4901):708. PubMed ID: 10267770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On stage for a good performance review.
    Flanagan H
    Health Serv Manpow Rev; 1988 Mar; 14(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 10286387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Developing criteria for promotion and tenure.
    Garrity M; Miller V; Osborn M; Vanderlinden M
    Nurs Outlook; 1980 Mar; 28(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 6899063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Criteria-based performance appraisals.
    Lerch EM
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):28-30. PubMed ID: 6920625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Changing management positions.
    Seville CM
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1985 Aug; 7(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 10272344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Field worker's forum.
    Ross WF
    Lepr Rev; 1980 Mar; 51(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 7464421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.