These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36426906)

  • 1. Predictors of efficacy for cervical ripening among the Bishop score criteria in nulliparous women at term.
    Ducarme G; Berthommier L; Planche L
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 161(3):934-941. PubMed ID: 36426906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
    Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Favorable Simplified Bishop Score after cervical ripening associated with decreased cesarean birth rate.
    Lee DS; Tandel MD; Kwan L; Francoeur AA; Duong HL; Negi M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Mar; 4(2):100534. PubMed ID: 34808400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Ezebialu IU; Eke AC; Eleje GU; Nwachukwu CE
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 2015(6):CD010762. PubMed ID: 26068943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
    Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical cervicAl ripeninG for women with PrOlongedPregnancies (MAGPOP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a silicone double balloon catheter versus the Propess system for the slow release of dinoprostone for cervical ripening of prolonged pregnancies.
    Diguisto C; Le Gouge A; Giraudeau B; Perrotin F
    BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016069. PubMed ID: 28912192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
    Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of the cervical score in predicting successful outcome of labor induction.
    Williams MC; Krammer J; O'Brien WF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):784-9. PubMed ID: 9351765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Double-balloon device and intravaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in women with unfavourable cervix].
    Letailleur M; Mathieu N; Dietrich G; Lethuilier C; Verspyck E; Marpeau L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Jun; 43(6):424-30. PubMed ID: 25943409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimizing cervical ripening in women presenting with decreased fetal movements.
    Ben Zvi D; Gutzeit O; Iluz R; Weissman A; Solt I; Weiner Z; Zipori Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):7417-7421. PubMed ID: 34278924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial.
    Diguisto C; Le Gouge A; Arthuis C; Winer N; Parant O; Poncelet C; Chauleur C; Hannigsberg J; Ducarme G; Gallot D; Gabriel R; Desbriere R; Beucher G; Faraguet C; Isly H; Rozenberg P; Giraudeau B; Perrotin F;
    PLoS Med; 2021 Feb; 18(2):e1003448. PubMed ID: 33571294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening/labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL; Harris DY; Heise RH; Ramin KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 187(4):843-6. PubMed ID: 12388961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Factors predicting unsuccessful labor induction with dinoprostone in post-term pregnancy with unfavorable cervix].
    Ducarme G; Chesnoy V; Petit L
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Jan; 44(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 24239036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intracervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for labor induction with Bishop score ≤3: a secondary analysis.
    Gagnon J; Corlin T; Berghella V; Hoffman MK; Sciscione A; Marie PS; Schoen CN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jul; 3(4):100350. PubMed ID: 33757937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two management options for labor induction following unsuccessful prostaglandin E2 ripening.
    Gulersen M; DiSturco M; Krantz DA; Bornstein E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 May; 35(9):1759-1763. PubMed ID: 32449419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Double-Balloon Device for 6 Compared With 12 Hours for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Bleicher I; Dikopoltsev E; Kadour-Ferro E; Sammour R; Gonen R; Sagi S; Eshel A; Nussam L; Vitner D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 135(5):1153-1160. PubMed ID: 32282603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive factors for successful cervical ripening using a double-balloon catheter after previous cesarean delivery.
    Vital M; Grange J; Le Thuaut A; Dimet J; Ducarme G
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Sep; 142(3):288-294. PubMed ID: 29893994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of cervical ripening methods for induction of labour: A population-based study using coarsened exact matching.
    Blanc-Petitjean P; Carbonne B; Deneux-Tharaux C; Salomé M; Goffinet F; Le Ray C;
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 33(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 31342567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.