These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36427664)

  • 1. Implications of the Dobbs decision on marginalized populations: A letter in reply to the Supreme Court abortion ban impact on dermatology.
    Wong NS; Grant-Kels JM; Farshchian M
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 May; 88(5):e285. PubMed ID: 36427664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implications of the Dobbs decision on marginalized populations: Letter in reply to "The Supreme Court abortion ban impact on dermatology".
    Khanna R; Khanna R; Larson AR
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 May; 88(5):e287-e288. PubMed ID: 36528269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Teratogenic, unregulated, vitamin A acne supplements, and Roe v Wade: Response to "The Supreme Court abortion ban impact on dermatology".
    Zamil DH; Wang LK; Paidisetty PS; Asad U; Ren V
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 May; 88(5):e289. PubMed ID: 36780948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Supreme Court abortion ban impact on dermatology.
    Yousif J; Adlam T; Grant-Kels JM; Farshchian M
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2022 Nov; 87(5):1225-1226. PubMed ID: 35868572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs.
    Vinekar K; Karlapudi A; Nathan L; Turk JK; Rible R; Steinauer J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 35852261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights.
    Chopko ME
    Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. We're horrified by the rejection of Roe v Wade-but abortion is not a universal right in the UK.
    Graham S
    BMJ; 2022 Aug; 378():o1945. PubMed ID: 35977739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The fall of Roe
    Lewandowska M
    BMJ; 2022 Jun; 377():o1608. PubMed ID: 35768122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The state of abortion rights in the US.
    Davis MF
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):324-329. PubMed ID: 35975678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overturning Roe v. Wade: consequences for midlife women's health and well-being.
    Berg JA; Woods NF
    Womens Midlife Health; 2023 Jan; 9(1):2. PubMed ID: 36609311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions.
    Kemp KA; Carp RA; Brady DW
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1976; 1(3):319-37. PubMed ID: 1022805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
    Bryant MD
    Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The end of Roe v. Wade: implications for Women's mental health and care.
    Londoño Tobón A; McNicholas E; Clare CA; Ireland LD; Payne JL; Moore Simas TA; Scott RK; Becker M; Byatt N
    Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1087045. PubMed ID: 37215676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
    Benshoof J
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion and the Supreme Court: why legislative motive matters.
    Glantz LH
    Am J Public Health; 1986 Dec; 76(12):1452-5. PubMed ID: 3777296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion 1982: the Supreme Court once again.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1982 Nov; 46(11):681. PubMed ID: 7172671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protecting Health after Dobbs.
    Clark BR
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Nov; 52(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 36537270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. United States Supreme Court and abortion. 3.
    Holman EJ
    JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(4):447-8. PubMed ID: 4741028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.