These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36429416)

  • 1. Lighting a Path for Autonomous Vehicle Communication: The Effect of Light Projection on the Detection of Reversing Vehicles by Older Adult Pedestrians.
    Mason B; Lakshmanan S; McAuslan P; Waung M; Jia B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 36429416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stated preference analysis of autonomous vehicle among bicyclists and pedestrians in Pittsburgh using Bayesian Networks.
    Imanishimwe D; Kumar A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107278. PubMed ID: 37683566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External Human-Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles from Pedestrians' Perspective: A Survey Study.
    Guo J; Yuan Q; Yu J; Chen X; Yu W; Cheng Q; Wang W; Luo W; Jiang X
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 35591029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning to interpret novel eHMI: The effect of vehicle kinematics and eHMI familiarity on pedestrian' crossing behavior.
    Lee YM; Madigan R; Uzondu C; Garcia J; Romano R; Markkula G; Merat N
    J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():270-280. PubMed ID: 35249607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supervision of young children in parking lots: Impact on child pedestrian safety.
    Rouse JB; Schwebel DC
    J Safety Res; 2019 Sep; 70():201-206. PubMed ID: 31847996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deceleration parameters as implicit communication signals for pedestrians' crossing decisions and estimations of automated vehicle behaviour.
    Tian K; Tzigieras A; Wei C; Lee YM; Holmes C; Leonetti M; Merat N; Romano R; Markkula G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107173. PubMed ID: 37336051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One Solution Fits All? Evaluating Different Communication Strategies of a Light-based External Human-Machine Interface for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles from a Pedestrian's Perspective.
    Lau M; Jipp M; Oehl M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jun; 171():106641. PubMed ID: 35390700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of driver performance with a prototype cyber physical mid-block crossing advanced warning system.
    Angulo AV; Smith BL
    J Safety Res; 2021 Dec; 79():237-245. PubMed ID: 34848004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pedestrians' road-crossing behavior towards eHMI-equipped autonomous vehicles driving in segregated and mixed traffic conditions.
    Song Y; Jiang Q; Chen W; Zhuang X; Ma G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107115. PubMed ID: 37209555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Harnessing Vehicle-to-Pedestrian (V2P) Communication Technology: Sending Traffic Warnings to Texting Pedestrians.
    Rahimian P; O'Neal EE; Zhou S; Plumert JM; Kearney JK
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):833-843. PubMed ID: 29920115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian extreme value theory modelling framework to assess corridor-wide pedestrian safety using autonomous vehicle sensor data.
    Singh S; Ali Y; Haque MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107416. PubMed ID: 38056025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The adaptability and challenges of autonomous vehicles to pedestrians in urban China.
    Wang K; Li G; Chen J; Long Y; Chen T; Chen L; Xia Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 145():105692. PubMed ID: 32717413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Autonomous vehicles and street design: Exploring the role of medians in enhancing pedestrian street crossing safety using a virtual reality experiment.
    Joo Y; Kim SN; Kim BC; Cho GH; Kim J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107092. PubMed ID: 37126970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sharing roads with automated vehicles: A questionnaire investigation from drivers', cyclists' and pedestrians' perspectives.
    Li X; Kaye SA; Afghari AP; Oviedo-Trespalacios O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107093. PubMed ID: 37150131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analyzing fault and severity in pedestrian-motor vehicle accidents in China.
    Zhang G; Yau KK; Zhang X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Dec; 73():141-50. PubMed ID: 25238293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Communicating Intent of Automated Vehicles to Pedestrians.
    Habibovic A; Lundgren VM; Andersson J; Klingegård M; Lagström T; Sirkka A; Fagerlönn J; Edgren C; Fredriksson R; Krupenia S; Saluäär D; Larsson P
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1336. PubMed ID: 30131737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Utility of DSRC and V2X in Road Safety Applications and Intelligent Parking: Similarities, Differences, and the Future of Vehicular Communication.
    Zadobrischi E; Dimian M; Negru M
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 34770544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How Do Human-Driven Vehicles Avoid Pedestrians in Interactive Environments? A Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Sun S; Zhang Z; Zhang Z; Deng P; Tian K; Wei C
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pedestrian Injury Outcome as a Function of Vehicle Market Group in Victoria, Australia.
    D'elia A; Newstead S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(7):709-14. PubMed ID: 25665142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vulnerable Road Users and Connected Autonomous Vehicles Interaction: A Survey.
    Reyes-Muñoz A; Guerrero-Ibáñez J
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(12):. PubMed ID: 35746397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.