These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36430380)

  • 1. Detergent-Assisted Protein Digestion-On the Way to Avoid the Key Bottleneck of Shotgun Bottom-Up Proteomics.
    Danko K; Lukasheva E; Zhukov VA; Zgoda V; Frolov A
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Nov; 23(22):. PubMed ID: 36430380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does filter-aided sample preparation provide sufficient method linearity for quantitative plant shotgun proteomics?
    Leonova T; Ihling C; Saoud M; Frolova N; Rennert R; Wessjohann LA; Frolov A
    Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():874761. PubMed ID: 36507396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample Preparation by Easy Extraction and Digestion (SPEED) - A Universal, Rapid, and Detergent-free Protocol for Proteomics Based on Acid Extraction.
    Doellinger J; Schneider A; Hoeller M; Lasch P
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2020 Jan; 19(1):209-222. PubMed ID: 31754045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the precision of a detergent-assisted cartridge precipitation workflow for non-targeted quantitative proteomics.
    Nickerson JL; Gagnon H; Wentzell PD; Doucette AA
    Proteomics; 2024 May; 24(10):e2300339. PubMed ID: 38299459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of detergent-based sample preparation workflows for LTQ-Orbitrap analysis of the Escherichia coli proteome.
    Tanca A; Biosa G; Pagnozzi D; Addis MF; Uzzau S
    Proteomics; 2013 Sep; 13(17):2597-607. PubMed ID: 23784971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient Tandem LysC/Trypsin Digestion in Detergent Conditions.
    Hakobyan A; Schneider MB; Liesack W; Glatter T
    Proteomics; 2019 Oct; 19(20):e1900136. PubMed ID: 31536157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) method increases peptide and protein identifications for shotgun proteomics.
    Ni MW; Wang L; Chen W; Mou HZ; Zhou J; Zheng ZG
    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2017 Jan; 31(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 27794190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Post-digestion ¹⁸O exchange/labeling for quantitative shotgun proteomics of membrane proteins.
    Ye X; Luke BT; Johann DJ; Chan KC; Prieto DA; Ono A; Veenstra TD; Blonder J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 893():223-40. PubMed ID: 22665304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of In-Solution, FASP, and S-Trap Based Digestion Methods for Bottom-Up Proteomic Studies.
    Ludwig KR; Schroll MM; Hummon AB
    J Proteome Res; 2018 Jul; 17(7):2480-2490. PubMed ID: 29754492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Filter-Aided Sample Preparation for Proteome Analysis.
    Wiśniewski JR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1841():3-10. PubMed ID: 30259475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Miniprep assisted proteomics (MAP) for rapid proteomics sample preparation.
    Mousseau CB; Pierre CA; Hu DD; Champion MM
    Anal Methods; 2023 Feb; 15(7):916-924. PubMed ID: 36373982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity of mass spectrometry analysis depends on the shape of the filtration unit used for filter aided sample preparation (FASP).
    Lipecka J; Chhuon C; Bourderioux M; Bessard MA; van Endert P; Edelman A; Guerrera IC
    Proteomics; 2016 Jul; 16(13):1852-7. PubMed ID: 27219663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Plasma proteome coverage is increased by unique peptide recovery from sodium deoxycholate precipitate.
    Serra A; Zhu H; Gallart-Palau X; Park JE; Ho HH; Tam JP; Sze SK
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2016 Mar; 408(7):1963-73. PubMed ID: 26804737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of sodium dodecyl sulfate depletion techniques for proteome analysis by mass spectrometry.
    Kachuk C; Stephen K; Doucette A
    J Chromatogr A; 2015 Oct; 1418():158-166. PubMed ID: 26422304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring protein structural changes on a proteome-wide scale using limited proteolysis-coupled mass spectrometry.
    Schopper S; Kahraman A; Leuenberger P; Feng Y; Piazza I; Müller O; Boersema PJ; Picotti P
    Nat Protoc; 2017 Nov; 12(11):2391-2410. PubMed ID: 29072706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of mass spectrometry-compatible surfactants for shotgun proteomics.
    Chen EI; Cociorva D; Norris JL; Yates JR
    J Proteome Res; 2007 Jul; 6(7):2529-38. PubMed ID: 17530876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shotgun analysis of membrane proteomes by an improved SDS-assisted sample preparation method coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
    Lin Y; Jiang H; Yan Y; Peng B; Chen J; Lin H; Liu Z
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2012 Dec; 911():6-14. PubMed ID: 23217299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics; from Proteomes to Peptides.
    Rogers JC; Bomgarden RD
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 919():43-62. PubMed ID: 27975212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improvement of a sample preparation method assisted by sodium deoxycholate for mass-spectrometry-based shotgun membrane proteomics.
    Lin Y; Lin H; Liu Z; Wang K; Yan Y
    J Sep Sci; 2014 Nov; 37(22):3321-9. PubMed ID: 25196059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Full Membrane Protein Coverage Digestion and Quantitative Bottom-Up Mass Spectrometry Proteomics.
    Capri J; Whitelegge JP
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1550():61-67. PubMed ID: 28188523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.