227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36431111)
1. The Impact of Antiseptic-Loaded Bacterial Nanocellulose on Different Biofilms-An Effective Treatment for Chronic Wounds?
Luze H; Bernardelli de Mattos I; Nischwitz SP; Funk M; Tuca AC; Kamolz LP
J Clin Med; 2022 Nov; 11(22):. PubMed ID: 36431111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Delivery of antiseptic solutions by a bacterial cellulose wound dressing: Uptake, release and antibacterial efficacy of octenidine and povidone-iodine.
Bernardelli de Mattos I; Nischwitz SP; Tuca AC; Groeber-Becker F; Funk M; Birngruber T; Mautner SI; Kamolz LP; Holzer JCJ
Burns; 2020 Jun; 46(4):918-927. PubMed ID: 31653329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uptake of PHMB in a bacterial nanocellulose-based wound dressing: A feasible clinical procedure.
de Mattos IB; Holzer JCJ; Tuca AC; Groeber-Becker F; Funk M; Popp D; Mautner S; Birngruber T; Kamolz LP
Burns; 2019 Jun; 45(4):898-904. PubMed ID: 30509765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro molecular study of wound healing using biosynthesized bacteria nanocellulose/silver nanocomposite assisted by bioinformatics databases.
Moniri M; Boroumand Moghaddam A; Azizi S; Abdul Rahim R; Zuhainis SW; Navaderi M; Mohamad R
Int J Nanomedicine; 2018; 13():5097-5112. PubMed ID: 30254435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Increases the Sensitivity of Biofilm-Grown Staphylococcus aureus to Membrane-Targeting Antiseptics and Antibiotics.
Orazi G; Ruoff KL; O'Toole GA
mBio; 2019 Jul; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 31363032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of internally validated
Suleman L; Purcell L; Thomas H; Westgate S
J Wound Care; 2020 Mar; 29(3):154-161. PubMed ID: 32160088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [THE ROLE OF ANTISEPTICS AND STRATEGY OF BIOFILM REMOVAL IN CHRONIC WOUND].
Kucisec-Tepes N
Acta Med Croatica; 2016 Mar; 70(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 27220188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo.
Fitzgerald DJ; Renick PJ; Forrest EC; Tetens SP; Earnest DN; McMillan J; Kiedaisch BM; Shi L; Roche ED
Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Jan; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27859922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Antimicrobial Hypochlorous Wound Irrigation Solutions Demonstrate Lower Anti-biofilm Efficacy Against Bacterial Biofilm in a Complex
Rembe JD; Huelsboemer L; Plattfaut I; Besser M; Stuermer EK
Front Microbiol; 2020; 11():564513. PubMed ID: 33162949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Topical application of Lactobacilli successfully eradicates Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms and promotes wound healing in chronic wounds.
Li Z; Zhang S; Zuber F; Altenried S; Jaklenec A; Langer R; Ren Q
Microbes Infect; 2023; 25(8):105176. PubMed ID: 37406851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Active wound dressings based on bacterial nanocellulose as drug delivery system for octenidine.
Moritz S; Wiegand C; Wesarg F; Hessler N; Müller FA; Kralisch D; Hipler UC; Fischer D
Int J Pharm; 2014 Aug; 471(1-2):45-55. PubMed ID: 24792978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and in vitro performance of an antibiofilm Hydrofiber wound dressing.
Scully R; Hurlow J; Walker M; Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler P
J Wound Care; 2018 Sep; 27(9):584-592. PubMed ID: 30204577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antibiofilm activity of chitosan/epsilon-poly-L-lysine hydrogels in a porcine ex vivo skin wound polymicrobial biofilm model.
Pati BA; Kurata WE; Horseman TS; Pierce LM
Wound Repair Regen; 2021 Mar; 29(2):316-326. PubMed ID: 33480137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In Vitro Efficacy of Bacterial Cellulose Dressings Chemisorbed with Antiseptics against Biofilm Formed by Pathogens Isolated from Chronic Wounds.
Dydak K; Junka A; Dydak A; Brożyna M; Paleczny J; Fijalkowski K; Kubielas G; Aniołek O; Bartoszewicz M
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Apr; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 33924416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
Seth AK; Zhong A; Nguyen KT; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA
Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of antiseptics in a novel 3-dimensional human plasma biofilm model (hpBIOM).
Besser M; Dietrich M; Weber L; Rembe JD; Stuermer EK
Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4792. PubMed ID: 32179838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The In Vitro Impact of Isoxazole Derivatives on Pathogenic Biofilm and Cytotoxicity of Fibroblast Cell Line.
Bąchor U; Junka A; Brożyna M; Mączyński M
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Feb; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 36769319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel chronic wound biofilm model sustaining coexistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus suitable for testing of antibiofilm effect of antimicrobial solutions and wound dressings.
Chen X; Lorenzen J; Xu Y; Jonikaite M; Thaarup IC; Bjarnsholt T; Kirketerp-Møller K; Thomsen TR
Wound Repair Regen; 2021 Sep; 29(5):820-829. PubMed ID: 34105845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Bacterial Nanocellulose Membranes Loaded or Not with Nisin as a Complementary Treatment in Surgical Dehorning Wounds in Bovines.
Custódio FAF; de Castro LM; Unterkircher E; Porto ACRC; Braga IS; Hataka A; Jozala AF; Grotto D
Pharmaceutics; 2021 May; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 34064695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of common antiseptic solutions against clinically relevant microorganisms in biofilm.
O'Donnell JA; Wu M; Cochrane NH; Belay E; Myntti MF; James GA; Ryan SP; Seyler TM
Bone Joint J; 2021 May; 103-B(5):908-915. PubMed ID: 33934664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
