186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36431182)
21. Spatial analysis of acoustic noise transfer function with a human-body phantom in a clinical MRI scanner.
Hamaguchi T; Miyati T; Ohno N; Matsushita T; Takata T; Matsuura Y; Kobayashi S; Gabata T
Acta Radiol; 2023 Mar; 64(3):1212-1221. PubMed ID: 35538857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Tolerance of magnetic resonance imaging in children and adolescents performed in a 1.5 Tesla MR scanner with an open design].
Adamietz B; Cavallaro A; Radkow T; Alibek S; Holter W; Bautz WA; Staatz G
Rofo; 2007 Aug; 179(8):826-31. PubMed ID: 17577870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Measurements of the ripple effect and geometric distribution of switched gradient fields inside a magnetic resonance scanner.
Sundström H; Mild KH; Wilén J
Bioelectromagnetics; 2015 Feb; 36(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 25399749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Small Field-of-view single-shot EPI-DWI of the prostate: Evaluation of spatially-tailored two-dimensional radiofrequency excitation pulses.
Attenberger UI; Rathmann N; Sertdemir M; Riffel P; Weidner A; Kannengiesser S; Morelli JN; Schoenberg SO; Hausmann D
Z Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 26(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 26300045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of SAR distribution of hip and knee implantable devices in 1.5T conventional cylindrical-bore and 1.2T open-bore vertical MRI systems.
Fujimoto K; Zaidi TA; Lampman D; Guag JW; Etheridge S; Habara H; Rajan SS
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Mar; 87(3):1515-1528. PubMed ID: 34775615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [New clinical applications for low-field magnetic resonance imaging : Technical and physical aspects].
Breit HC; Vosshenrich J; Bach M; Merkle EM
Radiologe; 2022 May; 62(5):394-399. PubMed ID: 35191997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Modulating Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Screening in Oncologic Tertiary Prevention: A Prospective Ex Vivo and In Vivo Study.
Dreher C; Kuder TA; König F; Paech D; Tavakoli A; Laun FB; Flothow F; Gnirs R; Benkert T; Nickel D; Strecker R; Schlemmer HP; Bickelhaupt S
Invest Radiol; 2019 Nov; 54(11):704-711. PubMed ID: 31356384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. MR-guided core biopsy with MR fluoroscopy using a short, wide-bore 1.5-Tesla scanner: feasibility and initial results.
Stattaus J; Maderwald S; Forsting M; Barkhausen J; Ladd ME
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 May; 27(5):1181-7. PubMed ID: 18425833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.
Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Patient preferences for development in MRI scanner design: a survey of claustrophobic patients in a randomized study.
Iwan E; Yang J; Enders J; Napp AE; Rief M; Dewey M
Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1325-1335. PubMed ID: 32876831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Wide, short bore magnetic resonance at 1.5 t: reducing the failure rate in claustrophobic patients.
Hunt CH; Wood CP; Lane JI; Bolster BD; Bernstein MA; Witte RJ
Clin Neuroradiol; 2011 Sep; 21(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 21598040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging acoustic noise reduction technology by magnetic gradient waveform control.
Yamashiro T; Morita K; Nakajima K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 63():170-177. PubMed ID: 31425801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Liver acquisition with volume acceleration flex on 70-cm wide-bore and 60-cm conventional-bore 3.0-T MRI.
Saito S; Tanaka K; Hashido T
Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jul; 9(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 26739299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Body composition profiling at 0.55T: Feasibility and precision.
Nayak KS; Cui SX; Tasdelen B; Yagiz E; Weston S; Zhong X; Ahlgren A
Magn Reson Med; 2023 Sep; 90(3):1114-1120. PubMed ID: 37125645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Asymmetric gradient coil design for use in a short, open bore magnetic resonance imaging scanner.
Wang Y; Liu F; Li Y; Tang F; Crozier S
J Magn Reson; 2016 Aug; 269():203-212. PubMed ID: 27372211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Vertical open-bore MRI scanners generate significantly less radiofrequency heating around implanted leads: A study of deep brain stimulation implants in 1.2T OASIS scanners versus 1.5T horizontal systems.
Kazemivalipour E; Bhusal B; Vu J; Lin S; Nguyen BT; Kirsch J; Nowac E; Pilitsis J; Rosenow J; Atalar E; Golestanirad L
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Sep; 86(3):1560-1572. PubMed ID: 33961301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using an Open 1.0T MR Platform: A Comparative Study with a 1.5T Tunnel System.
Fischbach K; Kosiek O; Friebe B; Wybranski C; Schnackenburg B; Schmeisser A; Smid J; Ricke J; Pech M
Pol J Radiol; 2017; 82():498-505. PubMed ID: 29662579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of feasibility of 1.5 Tesla prostate MRI using body coil RF transmit in a patient with an implanted vagus nerve stimulator.
Favazza CP; Edmonson HA; Ma C; Shu Y; Felmlee JP; Watson RE; Gorny KR
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5749-5754. PubMed ID: 28880381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner.
Hattori Y; Fukatsu H; Ishigaki T
Nagoya J Med Sci; 2007 Jan; 69(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 17378177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Modern Low-Field MRI of the Musculoskeletal System: Practice Considerations, Opportunities, and Challenges.
Khodarahmi I; Keerthivasan MB; Brinkmann IM; Grodzki D; Fritz J
Invest Radiol; 2023 Jan; 58(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 36165841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]