These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36431331)

  • 21. Digital and manual cephalometric analysis.
    Thurzo A; Javorka V; Stanko P; Lysy J; Suchancova B; Lehotska V; Valkovic L; Makovnik M
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2010; 111(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 20429323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.
    Ghoneima A; Albarakati S; Baysal A; Uysal T; Kula K
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23304973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
    Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating the effect of digital technology on the learning of orthodontic cephalometric measurement.
    Yu X; Tian Y; Li D; Sun W; Wang H; Yuan S; Yan B; Wang L; Pan Y
    F1000Res; 2022; 11():328. PubMed ID: 38009103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparative evaluation of concordance and speed between smartphone app-based and artificial intelligence web-based cephalometric tracing software with the manual tracing method: A cross-sectional study.
    Gupta S; Shetty S; Natarajan S; Nambiar S; Mv A; Agarwal S
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e11-e17. PubMed ID: 38314342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative Evaluation of Conventional and OnyxCeph™ Dental Software Measurements on Cephalometric Radiography.
    İzgi E; Pekiner FN
    Turk J Orthod; 2019 Jun; 32(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 31294411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparable Skeletal and Dental Movements Achieved Using Conventional and Surgery-First Techniques in Class III Patients.
    Florentine C; Kimberly A; Mehta S; Kuo CL; Uribe F; Lottinger C
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Nov; 80(11):1747-1756. PubMed ID: 36076358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Preciseness of artificial intelligence for lateral cephalometric measurements.
    El-Dawlatly M; Attia KH; Abdelghaffar AY; Mostafa YA; Abd El-Ghafour M
    J Orofac Orthop; 2024 May; 85(Suppl 1):27-33. PubMed ID: 36894679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of OneCeph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis-a cross-sectional study.
    Mohan A; Sivakumar A; Nalabothu P
    BDJ Open; 2021 Jun; 7(1):22. PubMed ID: 34140466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reproducibility of Computerized Cephalometric Analysis Software Compared with Conventional Manual Tracing for Analyzing Skeletal Stability After Orthognathic Surgery.
    Thet PH; Kaboosaya B
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2023 Dec; 22(4):833-840. PubMed ID: 38105843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements.
    Nalçaci R; Oztürk F; Sökücü O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 20100922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dolphin Imaging Software: an analysis of the accuracy of cephalometric digitization and orthognathic prediction.
    Power G; Breckon J; Sherriff M; McDonald F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 34(6):619-26. PubMed ID: 15916879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reproducibility of measurements in tablet-assisted, PC-aided, and manual cephalometric analysis.
    Goracci C; Ferrari M
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 24160993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing the Reliability of Digitalized Cephalometric Analysis in Comparison with Manual Cephalometric Analysis.
    Farooq MU; Khan MA; Imran S; Sameera A; Qureshi A; Ahmed SA; Kumar S; Rahman MA
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Oct; 10(10):ZC20-ZC23. PubMed ID: 27891451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The reliability and reproducibility of an Android cephalometric smartphone application in comparison with the conventional method.
    Zamrik OM; İşeri H
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Mar; 91(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 33367490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative Evaluation of Digital Cephalometric Tracing Applications on Mobile Devices and Manual Tracing.
    Hassan MM; Alfaifi WH; Qaysi AM; Alfaifi AA; AlGhafli ZM; Mattoo KA; Daghriri SM; Hawthan LM; Daghriri RM; Moafa AA; Al Moaleem MM
    Med Sci Monit; 2024 Jun; 30():e944628. PubMed ID: 38909276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative evaluation of cephalometric measurements of monitor-displayed images by Nemoceph software and its hard copy by manual tracing.
    Tikku T; Khanna R; Maurya RP; Srivastava K; Bhushan R
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2014; 4(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 25737917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1297-309. PubMed ID: 26704370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.