BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36433699)

  • 1. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo aortic valve replacement: which procedure for which patient?
    Hutt E; Mehra N; Desai MY
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2022 Dec; 20(12):911-918. PubMed ID: 36433699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-Year Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Using New-Generation Transcatheter Devices Compared With Redo-SAVR.
    Nagasaka T; Koren O; Patel V; Naami R; Naami E; Shechter A; Kohan S; Allison Z; Lerner A; Cheng DE; Chakravarty T; Cheng W; Jilaihawi H; Ishii H; Nakamura M; Makkar RR
    Am J Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 207():380-389. PubMed ID: 37778227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analysis comparing valve-in-valve TAVR and redo-SAVR in patients with degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve.
    Saleem S; Ullah W; Syed MA; Megaly M; Thalambedu N; Younas S; Zahid S; Alam M; Virani SS; Verma DR; Abdul-Waheed M; Fischman DL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(5):940-947. PubMed ID: 34110684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Isolated Redo Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Valve Replacement.
    Patel PM; Chiou E; Cao Y; Binongo J; Guyton RA; Leshnower B; Grubb KJ; Chen EP
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Aug; 112(2):539-545. PubMed ID: 33129775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes.
    Thandra A; Abusnina W; Jhand A; Shaikh K; Bansal R; Pajjuru VS; Al-Abdouh A; Kanmanthareddy A; Alla VM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jun; 97(7):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 33580743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tam DY; Vo TX; Wijeysundera HC; Dvir D; Friedrich JO; Fremes SE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):1404-1411. PubMed ID: 30024102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ahmed A; Levy KH
    J Card Surg; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2486-2495. PubMed ID: 33797799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Redo-aortic valve replacement in prior stentless prosthetic aortic valves: Transcatheter versus surgical approach.
    Choi CH; Cao K; Malaver D; Kincaid EH; Lata A; Kon N; Belford PM; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jan; 99(1):181-192. PubMed ID: 34402588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?
    Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-Analysis of Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation Versus Redo Aortic Valve Surgery for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Dysfunction.
    Neupane S; Singh H; Lämmer J; Othman H; Yamasaki H; Rosman HS; Bossone E; Mehta RH; Eggebrecht H
    Am J Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 121(12):1593-1600. PubMed ID: 29776652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Choi CH; Cheng V; Malaver D; Kon N; Kincaid EH; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1106-1115. PubMed ID: 30588736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Failed Transcatheter Bioprosthetic Valves.
    Tarantini G; Sathananthan J; Fabris T; Landes U; Bapat VN; Khan JM; Nai Fovino L; Zaid S; Van Mieghem NM; Latib A; Waksman R; De Backer O; Rogers T; Søndergaard L; Tang GHL
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Sep; 15(18):1777-1793. PubMed ID: 36137681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
    Sá MPBO; Van den Eynde J; Simonato M; Cavalcanti LRP; Doulamis IP; Weixler V; Kampaktsis PN; Gallo M; Laforgia PL; Zhigalov K; Ruhparwar A; Weymann A; Pibarot P; Clavel MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jan; 14(2):211-220. PubMed ID: 33478639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Aortic Valve Replacement as an Alternative to Surgical Re-Replacement.
    Deharo P; Bisson A; Herbert J; Lacour T; Etienne CS; Porto A; Theron A; Collart F; Bourguignon T; Cuisset T; Fauchier L
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 76(5):489-499. PubMed ID: 32731926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-Term Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis of Kaplan-Meier-Derived Data.
    Sá MP; Jacquemyn X; Serna-Gallegos D; Makani A; Kliner D; Toma C; West D; Ahmad D; Yousef S; Brown JA; Yoon P; Kaczorowski D; Bonatti J; Chu D; Sultan I
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Feb; 212():30-39. PubMed ID: 38070591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-Surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Nalluri N; Atti V; Munir AB; Karam B; Patel NJ; Kumar V; Vemula P; Edla S; Asti D; Paturu A; Gayam S; Spagnola J; Barsoum E; Maniatis GA; Tamburrino F; Kandov R; Lafferty J; Kliger C
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Oct; 31(5):661-671. PubMed ID: 29781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedure in Patients with Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Deterioration.
    Reul RM; Ramchandani MK; Reardon MJ
    Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2017; 13(3):132-141. PubMed ID: 29743998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement in degenerated transcatheter bioprosthesis (TAV-in-TAV).
    Sánchez-Ceña J; Asmarats L; Li CHP; Millán X; Fernández-Peregrina E; Menduiña I; Massó van Roessel A; Arzamendi D
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2023; 21(10):703-712. PubMed ID: 37815845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aortic Regurgitation, Time to Aortic Valve Reintervention, and Mortality in Degenerated Trifecta Versus Non-Trifecta Bioprosthesis.
    Abbas AE; Madanat L; Khalili H; Mando R; Kheyrbek M; Chandra R; Niroula S; Hanson I; Dixon S; Renard B; Bloomingdale R; Cami E; Pridham B; Altshuler J; Kindzelski B; Fazzalari F; Shannon F; Vivacqua A
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Jun; 220():49-55. PubMed ID: 38580038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early and Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve Degeneration: Two Faces of the Same Medal.
    Dokollari A; Cameli M; Mandoli GE; Kalra DS; Poston R; Coku L; Pernoci M; Miri M; Bonacchi M; Gelsomino S
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2021 Nov; 35(11):3223-3231. PubMed ID: 34175205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.