154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3643448)
1. Treatment decisions with the terminally ill incompetent patient.
O'Neil EA
Nurs Econ; 1987; 5(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 3643448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. More on appropriate decision making for the terminally ill incompetent patient.
Norris JA
Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):i-vi. PubMed ID: 507059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical principles in the nursing care of the terminally ill adult.
Otte DM; Allen KS
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1987; 14(5):87-91. PubMed ID: 3658783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bishops' response to Act on Rights of Terminally Ill.
Brodeur D
Health Prog; 1987; 68(1):22-5, 94. PubMed ID: 10280352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience.
Thomson CJ
Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients.
Dippel DL
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Life and death decisions: a reply to Judge Peccarelli.
Kramer IR
John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):569-83. PubMed ID: 16622960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Decisions for the dying: an empirical study of physicians' responses to advance directives.
Zinberg JM
Vt Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):445-91. PubMed ID: 11653869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Termination of life-sustaining medical treatment: who should exercise a patient's right to die?
Denbo SM
Health Care Superv; 1994 Jun; 12(4):60-72. PubMed ID: 10134143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Love and let die.
Painton P; Taylor E
Time; 1990 Mar; 135(12):62-8, 70-1. PubMed ID: 10104321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Catholic positions on withholding sustenance for the terminally ill.
McCartney JJ
Health Prog; 1986 Oct; 67(8):38-40. PubMed ID: 10311726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Defining the family's role in treatment decisions.
Veatch RM
Health Prog; 1986 Oct; 67(8):50-2. PubMed ID: 10279011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Death and life decisions: who is in control?
Kenney SC
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 23(3):791-828. PubMed ID: 11652584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan.
Karbal W
J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Withholding nutrition: a nursing perspective.
Mumma CM
Nurs Adm Q; 1986; 10(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 3085030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminal ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part I.
Suber DG; Tabor WJ
JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(18):2250-1. PubMed ID: 7131676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The "Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act": a critical analysis.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):441-75. PubMed ID: 3636288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal regulation of terminal care: options and obstacles.
Winslade WJ
Tex Med; 1991 Feb; 87(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 2031233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
Harner SR
Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
