BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36434521)

  • 1. Quality appraisal for systematic literature reviews of health state utility values: a descriptive analysis.
    Muchadeyi MT; Hernandez-Villafuerte K; Schlander M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):303. PubMed ID: 36434521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality Appraisal in Systematic Literature Reviews of Studies Eliciting Health State Utility Values: Conceptual Considerations.
    Muchadeyi MT; Hernandez-Villafuerte K; Di Tanna GL; Eckford RD; Feng Y; Meregaglia M; Peasgood T; Petrou S; Ubels J; Schlander M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2024 Jul; 42(7):767-782. PubMed ID: 38551803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A systematic literature review of health state utility values in head and neck cancer.
    Meregaglia M; Cairns J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Sep; 15(1):174. PubMed ID: 28865475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health state utility values among children and adolescents with disabilities: protocol for a systematic review.
    Kanya L; Anokye N; Ryan JM
    BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e019978. PubMed ID: 29467137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toward a Centralized, Systematic Approach to the Identification, Appraisal, and Use of Health State Utility Values for Reimbursement Decision Making: Introducing the Health Utility Book (HUB).
    Xie F; Zoratti M; Chan K; Husereau D; Krahn M; Levine O; Clifford T; Schunemann H; Guyatt G
    Med Decis Making; 2019 May; 39(4):370-378. PubMed ID: 30902030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic Review of Health State Utility Values Used in European Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations for Chronic Hepatitis C: Impact on Cost-Effectiveness Results.
    Han R; François C; Toumi M
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2021 Jan; 19(1):29-44. PubMed ID: 32661846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Critical appraisal of health-state utility values used in breast cancer-related cost-utility analyses.
    Nerich V; Saing S; Gamper EM; Holzner B; Pivot X; Viney R; Kemmler G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):527-536. PubMed ID: 28497177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of age on health utility values for older women with early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-regression.
    Wang Y; Gavan SP; Steinke D; Cheung KL; Chen LC
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2022 Dec; 20(1):169. PubMed ID: 36564800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health state utility values in major depressive disorder treated with pharmacological interventions: a systematic literature review.
    Brockbank J; Krause T; Moss E; Pedersen AM; Mørup MF; Ahdesmäki O; Vaughan J; Brodtkorb TH
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Mar; 19(1):94. PubMed ID: 33736649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-utility analyses of drug therapies in breast cancer: a systematic review.
    Nerich V; Saing S; Gamper EM; Kemmler G; Daval F; Pivot X; Holzner B
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Oct; 159(3):407-24. PubMed ID: 27572551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The estimation of health state utility values in rare diseases: do the approaches in submissions for NICE technology appraisals reflect the existing literature? A scoping review.
    Meregaglia M; Nicod E; Drummond M
    Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Sep; 24(7):1151-1216. PubMed ID: 36335234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health state utility values by cancer stage: a systematic literature review.
    Pourrahmat MM; Kim A; Kansal AR; Hux M; Pushkarna D; Fazeli MS; Chung KC
    Eur J Health Econ; 2021 Nov; 22(8):1275-1288. PubMed ID: 34125315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic review of health state utility values and psychometric performance of generic preference-based instruments for children and adolescents with mental health problems.
    Thai TTH; Engel L; Perez JK; Tan EJ; Eades S; Sanci L; Mihalopoulos C
    Qual Life Res; 2023 Nov; 32(11):3005-3026. PubMed ID: 37237136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-reviewer reliability of human literature reviewing and implications for the introduction of machine-assisted systematic reviews: a mixed-methods review.
    Hanegraaf P; Wondimu A; Mosselman JJ; de Jong R; Abogunrin S; Queiros L; Lane M; Postma MJ; Boersma C; van der Schans J
    BMJ Open; 2024 Mar; 14(3):e076912. PubMed ID: 38508610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health State Utility Values of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Related Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Redenz G; Ibaceta MC; Aceituno D; Balmaceda C; Espinoza MA
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2023 Mar; 34():14-22. PubMed ID: 36371899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of tools for assessing the methodological quality of primary and secondary studies in health technology assessment reports in Germany.
    Dreier M; Borutta B; Stahmeyer J; Krauth C; Walter U
    GMS Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jun; 6():Doc07. PubMed ID: 21289880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Systematic Review of Health State Utility Values in the Plastic Surgery Literature.
    Christopher AN; Morris MP; Patel V; Klifto K; Fischer JP
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2021 Nov; 9(11):e3944. PubMed ID: 34849317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review.
    Majmudar IK; Mihalopoulos C; Brijnath B; Lim MH; Hall NY; Engel L
    Qual Life Res; 2022 Jul; 31(7):1977-1997. PubMed ID: 35072904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.