159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36435445)
1. Maxillary transverse deficiency, with closed intermaxillary suture, does bone-anchored appliance during SARPE cause predictable, and stable maxillary expansion compared to the tooth-borne appliance during SARPE - Systematic review.
Kwiatkowski J; Kopczyńska L; Ling M; Komisarek O
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 124(1S):101344. PubMed ID: 36435445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion in class III malocclusion: Our experience.
Barrabé A; Meyer C; Bonomi H; Weber E; Sigaux N; Louvrier A
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 119(5):384-388. PubMed ID: 29753777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tooth-borne versus bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion for transverse maxillary deficiency: A systematic review.
Khosravi M; Ugolini A; Miresmaeili A; Mirzaei H; Shahidi-Zandi V; Soheilifar S; Karami M; Mahmoudzadeh M
Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):425-436. PubMed ID: 31280998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transverse effects after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion in the midpalatal suture using computed tomography.
Loddi PP; Pereira MD; Wolosker AB; Hino CT; Kreniski TM; Ferreira LM
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):433-8. PubMed ID: 18362722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maxillary expansion in nongrowing patients. Conventional, surgical, or miniscrew-assisted, an update.
Chamberland S
J World Fed Orthod; 2023 Aug; 12(4):173-183. PubMed ID: 37344295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term skeletal and dental changes following bone-borne versus tooth-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: a randomized clinical trial study.
Zandi M; Miresmaeili A; Heidari A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1190-5. PubMed ID: 24704281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stability of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion with and without retention analyzed by 3-dimensional imaging.
Prado GP; Furtado F; Aloise AC; Biló JP; Masako Ferreira L; Pereira MD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):610-6. PubMed ID: 24785925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cone-beam computed tomographic comparison of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion and multipiece Le Fort I osteotomy.
Yao W; Bekmezian S; Hardy D; Kushner HW; Miller AJ; Huang JC; Lee JS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 73(3):499-508. PubMed ID: 25488314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of SARPE and MISMARPE on correction of transverse maxillary deficiency: A preliminary comparative evaluation.
da Silva AV; da Rosa BM; Matje PRB; Rizzatto SMD; de Oliveira RB; Haas OL; de Menezes LM
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Apr; 27(2):332-338. PubMed ID: 37728033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation of three surgical techniques combined with two different bone-borne forces for surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion of the maxillofacial complex: a finite element analysis.
Möhlhenrich SC; Modabber A; Kniha K; Peters F; Steiner T; Hölzle F; Fritz U; Raith S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 46(10):1306-1314. PubMed ID: 28610819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microimplant assisted rapid palatal expansion vs surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion for maxillary transverse discrepancy treatment.
de Oliveira CB; Ayub P; Ledra IM; Murata WH; Suzuki SS; Ravelli DB; Santos-Pinto A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jun; 159(6):733-742. PubMed ID: 33931257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone-borne palatal distraction to correct the constricted cleft maxilla.
Vyas RM; Jarrahy R; Sisodia M; Jourabchi N; Wasson KL; Bradley JP
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 May; 20(3):733-6. PubMed ID: 19480033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hyrax appliance opening and pattern of skeletal maxillary expansion after surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: a computed tomography evaluation.
Goldenberg DC; Goldenberg FC; Alonso N; Gebrin ES; Amaral TS; Scanavini MA; Ferreira MC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Dec; 106(6):812-9. PubMed ID: 18805713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional prospective evaluation of tooth-borne and bone-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion.
Nada RM; Fudalej PS; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Mostafa YA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):757-62. PubMed ID: 22417772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Closer look at the stability of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion.
Chamberland S; Proffit WR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1895-900. PubMed ID: 18718397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and CT Scan Evaluation of Outcomes of Modified SARPE Using a Bone-Borne Hyrax Appliance in Unilateral Posterior Crossbite.
Rajkumar K; Walia BS; Viswambaran M; Ganesh V; Padmavati
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2023 Dec; 22(4):900-907. PubMed ID: 38105837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of skeletal maxillary transverse deficiency treated by microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion and tooth-borne expansion during the post-pubertal growth spurt stage.
Jia H; Zhuang L; Zhang N; Bian Y; Li S
Angle Orthod; 2021 Jan; 91(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 33289835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of pulp volume changes after surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion.
Guler AY; Isik BK; Esen A; Menziletoglu D
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jun; 122(3):263-266. PubMed ID: 32621998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stability of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: a randomized trial.
Prado GP; Pereira MD; Biló JP; Furtado F; Ferreira LM
J Dent Res; 2013 Jul; 92(7 Suppl):49S-54S. PubMed ID: 23690355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
