These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36436109)

  • 1. Differences of resource allocation to active and passive states in visual working memory.
    Chen Z; Sun Q; Li X
    Psychol Res; 2023 Sep; 87(6):1761-1767. PubMed ID: 36436109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The storage resources of the active and passive states are independent in visual working memory.
    Li Z; Liang T; Liu Q
    Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104911. PubMed ID: 34563866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.
    Gunseli E; van Moorselaar D; Meeter M; Olivers CN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1334-41. PubMed ID: 25563713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development of retro-cue benefits with extensive practice: Implications for capacity estimation and attentional states in visual working memory.
    Zerr P; Gayet S; van den Esschert F; Kappen M; Olah Z; Van der Stigchel S
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):1036-1049. PubMed ID: 33616865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The allocation of working memory resources determines the efficiency of attentional templates in single- and dual-target search.
    Huynh Cong S; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Dec; 151(12):2977-2989. PubMed ID: 35696178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):890-910. PubMed ID: 26752731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 293():114-24. PubMed ID: 26196953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of retro-cue validity on working memory representation: Evidence from electroencephalograms.
    Fu X; Ye C; Hu Z; Li Z; Liang T; Liu Q
    Biol Psychol; 2022 Apr; 170():108320. PubMed ID: 35337895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No evidence that the retro-cue benefit requires reallocation of memory resources.
    Lin YT; Fougnie D
    Cognition; 2022 Dec; 229():105230. PubMed ID: 36007468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adverse orienting effects on visual working memory encoding and maintenance.
    Wang B; Yan C; Wang Z; Olivers CNL; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1261-1267. PubMed ID: 27896633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tracking attentional states: Assessing the relationship between sustained and selective focused attention in visual working memory.
    Arnicane A; Souza AS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):715-738. PubMed ID: 35297019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different effects of color-based and location-based selection on visual working memory.
    Li Q; Saiki J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):450-63. PubMed ID: 25338537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of attentional biases on multiple working memory precision parameters for children and adults.
    Shimi A; Scerif G
    Dev Sci; 2022 May; 25(3):e13213. PubMed ID: 34897919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retro-cue effect: The retro-cue is effective when and only when working memory consolidation is inadequate.
    Luo T; Huang L; Tian M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Sep; 49(9):1439-1458. PubMed ID: 37023308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No age deficits in the ability to use attention to improve visual working memory.
    Souza AS
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Aug; 31(5):456-70. PubMed ID: 27253868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shifting attention among working memory representations: testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control.
    Berryhill ME; Richmond LL; Shay CS; Olson IR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):426-38. PubMed ID: 21846267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early top-down control of internal selection induced by retrospective cues in visual working memory: advantage of peripheral over central cues.
    Han S; Zhou H; Tian Y; Ku Y
    Prog Neurobiol; 2023 Nov; 230():102521. PubMed ID: 37673370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prioritization in visual working memory enhances memory retention and speeds up processing in a comparison task.
    Poth CH
    Cogn Process; 2020 Aug; 21(3):331-339. PubMed ID: 32206936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.