These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36437146)

  • 21. Angle Class III malocclusion with anteroposterior and vertical discrepancy in the final stage of growth.
    Arruda MBP
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(3):109-118. PubMed ID: 28746494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Facemask therapy with skeletal anchorage: A possible alternative to orthognathic surgery.
    Cha BK; Park JH; Choi DS; Jang I
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Mar; 24 Suppl 1():13-20. PubMed ID: 33119188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Treatment response and long-term dentofacial adaptations to maxillary expansion and protraction.
    Ngan PW; Hagg U; Yiu C; Wei SH
    Semin Orthod; 1997 Dec; 3(4):255-64. PubMed ID: 9573887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dentoskeletal effects of facemask therapy in skeletal Class III cleft patients with or without bone graft.
    Zhang Y; Jia H; Fu Z; Huang Y; Wang Z; Guo R; Shen J; Li W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):542-549. PubMed ID: 29602346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of protraction headgear on Class III malocclusion.
    Ngan P; Wei SH; Hagg U; Yiu CK; Merwin D; Stickel B
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Mar; 23(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 1641462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stability of rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy: a long-term controlled study.
    Masucci C; Franchi L; Defraia E; Mucedero M; Cozza P; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 21967936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Early class III treatment with hybrid rapid palatal expander combined with facemask.
    Lombardo L; Albertini P; Cervinara F; Brucculeri L; Siciliani G
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):624-635. PubMed ID: 32534993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term stability of LeFort III distraction osteogenesis with a rigid external distraction device in a patient with Crouzon syndrome.
    Kuroda S; Watanabe K; Ishimoto K; Nakanishi H; Moriyama K; Tanaka E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):550-61. PubMed ID: 21967944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cephalometric variables predicting the long-term success or failure of combined rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 15224054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nonsurgical treatment of a Class III malocclusion with maxillary skeletal retrusion using rapid maxillary expansion and reverse pull headgear.
    Fogle L; Law SS; Mosling M; Kinser D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jul; 114(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 9674682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion combined with chincup protraction followed by fixed appliances.
    Palma JC; Tejedor-Sanz N; Oteo MD; Alarcón JA
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24892796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with a high mandibular plane angle corrected with 2-phase treatment.
    Kurosawa M; Ando K; Goto S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 19201332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Long-term skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of hybrid rapid maxillary expansion and facemask treatment in growing skeletal Class III patients: a retrospective follow-up study.
    Maino GB; Cremonini F; Maino G; Paoletto E; De Maio M; Spedicato GA; Palone M; Lombardo L
    Prog Orthod; 2022 Sep; 23(1):44. PubMed ID: 36178519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Realities of craniofacial growth modification.
    Kluemper GT; Spalding PM
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2001 Mar; 9(1):23-51. PubMed ID: 11905336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cephalometric and occlusal changes following maxillary expansion and protraction.
    Ngan P; Yiu C; Hu A; Hägg U; Wei SH; Gunel E
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):237-54. PubMed ID: 9699402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study.
    Masucci C; Franchi L; Giuntini V; Defraia E
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Nov; 17(4):259-69. PubMed ID: 25041370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Long-term orthodontic and surgical treatment and stability of a patient with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.
    Hikita R; Kobayashi Y; Tsuji M; Kawamoto T; Moriyama K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):672-84. PubMed ID: 24785932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.