216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36438404)
1. The effects of genre on the syntactic complexity of argumentative and expository writing by Chinese EFL learners.
Pu L; Heng R; Cao C
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1047117. PubMed ID: 36438404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of genre on the lexical richness of argumentative and expository writing by Chinese EFL learners.
Heng R; Pu L; Liu X
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1082228. PubMed ID: 36704688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of reasoning demands triggered by genre on Chinese EFL learners' writing performance.
Peng C; Bao Z
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1164262. PubMed ID: 37265945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Problematizing Argumentative Writing in an Iranian EFL Undergraduate Context.
Ghanbari N; Salari M
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():862400. PubMed ID: 35756257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expressive writing in a Saudi university English foreign language (EFL) classroom: Evaluating gains in syntactic complexity.
Abdulaziz Alkhalaf SA
F1000Res; 2022; 11():723. PubMed ID: 37006628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Task-based explanation for genre effects: Evidence from a dependency treebank.
Wang Y; Jingyang J
PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0290381. PubMed ID: 37611016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners' writing.
Zhang C; Kang S
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1002090. PubMed ID: 36389505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of Linguistic Complexity in Writing Among Chinese EFL Learners in High-Stakes Tests: Insights From a Corpus of TOEFL iBT.
Qian L; Cheng Y; Zhao Y
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():765983. PubMed ID: 34777173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Text memorization: An effective strategy to improve Chinese EFL learners' argumentative writing proficiency.
Wang Q
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1126194. PubMed ID: 37082567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marked distinctions in syntactic complexity: A case of second language university learners' and native speakers' syntactic constructions.
Lyu J; Chishti MI; Peng Z
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1048286. PubMed ID: 36533008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of discourse markers in argumentative compositions by Jordanian EFL learners.
Huneety A; Alkhawaldeh A; Mashaqba B; Zaidan Z; Alshdaifat A
Humanit Soc Sci Commun; 2023; 10(1):41. PubMed ID: 36741981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adolescents' production of complex syntax in spoken and written expository and persuasive genres.
Brimo D; Hall-Mills S
Clin Linguist Phon; 2019; 33(3):237-255. PubMed ID: 30084672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human Ratings of Writing Quality Capture Features of Syntactic Variety and Transformation in Chinese EFL Learners' Argumentative Writing.
Xue J; Zheng L; Tang X; Li B; Geva E
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():660796. PubMed ID: 34867574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of cognitive task complexity and online planning on second language learners' argumentative writing.
Xu TS; Zhang LJ
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1121994. PubMed ID: 37663340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A genre-based approach in the secondary school English writing class: Voices from student-teachers in the teaching practicum.
Liu C; Chen M
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():992360. PubMed ID: 36148107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The integration of lexical, syntactic, and discourse features in bilingual adolescents' writing: an exploratory approach.
Danzak RL
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2011 Oct; 42(4):491-505. PubMed ID: 21969529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kolmogorov complexity metrics in assessing L2 proficiency: An information-theoretic approach.
Wang G; Wang H; Wang L
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1024147. PubMed ID: 36275271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reconsidering the syntactic complexity measures on L2 spoken English: A multi-dimensional perspective.
Xu P
Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e16856. PubMed ID: 37313146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A corpus-based comparison of syntactic complexity in academic writing of L1 and L2 English students across years and disciplines.
Shen C; Guo J; Shi P; Qu S; Tian J
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292688. PubMed ID: 37812624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of genre-based instruction on Saudi university students' English writing performance and motivation: a mixed-method study.
Abdel Latif MMM; Alghizzi TM; Alshahrani TM
Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1387009. PubMed ID: 38855299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
