These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36439070)

  • 1. Individual Differences in Cue Weighting in Sentence Comprehension: An Evaluation Using Approximate Bayesian Computation.
    Yadav H; Paape D; Smith G; Dillon BW; Vasishth S
    Open Mind (Camb); 2022; 6():1-24. PubMed ID: 36439070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Prominence and Cue Association on Retrieval Processes: A Computational Account.
    Engelmann F; Jӓger LA; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Dec; 43(12):e12800. PubMed ID: 31858626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using approximate Bayesian computation for estimating parameters in the cue-based retrieval model of sentence processing.
    Vasishth S
    MethodsX; 2020; 7():100850. PubMed ID: 32300544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrieval Interference in Syntactic Processing: The Case of Reflexive Binding in English.
    Patil U; Vasishth S; Lewis RL
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():329. PubMed ID: 27303315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cue integration during sentence comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence from ellipsis.
    Martin AE
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206616. PubMed ID: 30496297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semantic and Syntactic Interference in Sentence Comprehension: A Comparison of Working Memory Models.
    Tan Y; Martin RC; Van Dyke JA
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():198. PubMed ID: 28261133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Encoding and Retrieval Interference in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Agreement.
    Villata S; Tabor W; Franck J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2. PubMed ID: 29403414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit Prosody and Cue-based Retrieval: L1 and L2 Agreement and Comprehension during Reading.
    Pratt E; Fernández EM
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1922. PubMed ID: 28018264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Principled Approach to Feature Selection in Models of Sentence Processing.
    Smith G; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Dec; 44(12):e12918. PubMed ID: 33306205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited: A large-sample study.
    Jäger LA; Mertzen D; Van Dyke JA; Vasishth S
    J Mem Lang; 2020 Apr; 111():. PubMed ID: 33100507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Encoding interference effects support self-organized sentence processing.
    Smith G; Franck J; Tabor W
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 Feb; 124():101356. PubMed ID: 33285355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cue Combinatorics in Memory Retrieval for Anaphora.
    Parker D
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Mar; 43(3):e12715. PubMed ID: 30900293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Elaboration over a Discourse Facilitates Retrieval in Sentence Processing.
    Troyer M; Hofmeister P; Kutas M
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():374. PubMed ID: 27014172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension.
    Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1859-69. PubMed ID: 21925613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrieval cues and syntactic ambiguity resolution: Speed-accuracy tradeoff evidence.
    Martin AE; McElree B
    Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 33(6):769-783. PubMed ID: 31131287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Computational Evaluation of Two Models of Retrieval Processes in Sentence Processing in Aphasia.
    Lissón P; Pregla D; Nicenboim B; Paape D; van Het Nederend ML; Burchert F; Stadie N; Caplan D; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12956. PubMed ID: 33877698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing.
    Van Dyke JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):407-30. PubMed ID: 17352621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prosodic boundaries delay the processing of upcoming lexical information during silent sentence reading.
    Luo Y; Yan M; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):915-30. PubMed ID: 22774853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural basis of semantic and syntactic interference in sentence comprehension.
    Glaser YG; Martin RC; Van Dyke JA; Hamilton AC; Tan Y
    Brain Lang; 2013 Sep; 126(3):314-26. PubMed ID: 23933471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrieval interference in reflexive processing: experimental evidence from Mandarin, and computational modeling.
    Jäger LA; Engelmann F; Vasishth S
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():617. PubMed ID: 26074829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.