144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36439071)
1. This Better Be Interesting: A Speaker's Decision to Speak Cues Listeners to Expect Informative Content.
Rohde H; Hoek J; Keshev M; Franke M
Open Mind (Camb); 2022; 6():118-131. PubMed ID: 36439071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What's new? A comprehension bias in favor of informativity.
Rohde H; Futrell R; Lucas CG
Cognition; 2021 Apr; 209():104491. PubMed ID: 33545512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. I know what you're probably going to say: Listener adaptation to variable use of uncertainty expressions.
Schuster S; Degen J
Cognition; 2020 Oct; 203():104285. PubMed ID: 32535344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anticipating the Damn Referent: How Comprehenders Rapidly Retrieve the Speaker's Attitude When Processing Negative Expressive Adjectives.
Ronderos CR; Domaneschi F
Cogn Sci; 2023 May; 47(5):e13295. PubMed ID: 37203252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. I see what you meant to say: Anticipating speech errors during online sentence processing.
Lowder MW; Ferreira F
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1849-1858. PubMed ID: 30556724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cues to Lying May be Deceptive: Speaker and Listener Behaviour in an Interactive Game of Deception.
Loy JE; Rohde H; Corley M
J Cogn; 2018 Sep; 1(1):42. PubMed ID: 31517215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Informationally redundant utterances elicit pragmatic inferences.
Kravtchenko E; Demberg V
Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105159. PubMed ID: 35580451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Expectations about the source of a speaker's accent affect accent adaptation.
Vaughn CR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 May; 145(5):3218. PubMed ID: 31153344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cognitive control mediates age-related changes in flexible anticipatory processing during listening comprehension.
Dave S; Brothers T; Hoversten LJ; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
Brain Res; 2021 Oct; 1768():147573. PubMed ID: 34216583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.
Regel S; Coulson S; Gunter TC
Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1311():121-35. PubMed ID: 19900421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scalar Implicature is Sensitive to Contextual Alternatives.
Zhang Z; Bergen L; Paunov A; Ryskin R; Gibson E
Cogn Sci; 2023 Feb; 47(2):e13238. PubMed ID: 36739521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of Disfluency in Online Interpretation of Deception.
Loy JE; Rohde H; Corley M
Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6():1434-1456. PubMed ID: 27246116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On how the brain decodes vocal cues about speaker confidence.
Jiang X; Pell MD
Cortex; 2015 May; 66():9-34. PubMed ID: 25796072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gesture and reference to objects in the here-and-now: Listeners' use of gesture cues in quiet and in noise.
Saryazdi R; Chambers CG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Apr; 48(4):583-597. PubMed ID: 34180698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Situating language in a minimal social context: how seeing a picture of the speaker's face affects language comprehension.
Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Muñoz F; Sánchez-García J; Sommer W; Abdel Rahman R; Casado P; Jiménez-Ortega L; Espuny J; Fondevila S; Martín-Loeches M
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 May; 16(5):502-511. PubMed ID: 33470410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comprehending non-native speakers: theory and evidence for adjustment in manner of processing.
Lev-Ari S
Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1546. PubMed ID: 25653627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In Search of Salience: Focus Detection in the Speech of Different Talkers.
Ip MHK; Cutler A
Lang Speech; 2022 Sep; 65(3):650-680. PubMed ID: 34841933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pragmatics in understanding what is said.
Gibbs RW; Moise JF
Cognition; 1997 Jan; 62(1):51-74. PubMed ID: 8997170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Privileged versus shared knowledge about object identity in real-time referential processing.
Mozuraitis M; Chambers CG; Daneman M
Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():148-65. PubMed ID: 26048297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the same wavelength: predictable language enhances speaker-listener brain-to-brain synchrony in posterior superior temporal gyrus.
Dikker S; Silbert LJ; Hasson U; Zevin JD
J Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 34(18):6267-72. PubMed ID: 24790197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
