These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36439073)

  • 1. CELER: A 365-Participant Corpus of Eye Movements in L1 and L2 English Reading.
    Berzak Y; Nakamura C; Smith A; Weng E; Katz B; Flynn S; Levy R
    Open Mind (Camb); 2022; 6():41-50. PubMed ID: 36439073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in word skipping during reading in English as L2.
    Esteve D; Perea M; Angele B; Kuperman V; Drieghe D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38867033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency and predictability effects in first and second language of different script bilinguals.
    Mor B; Prior A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1363-1383. PubMed ID: 34498903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The missing-VP effect in readers of English as a second language.
    Frank SL; Ernst P; Thompson RL; Cozijn R
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Aug; 49(6):1204-1219. PubMed ID: 33864238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lexico-syntactic interactions during the processing of temporally ambiguous L2 relative clauses: An eye-tracking study with intermediate and advanced Portuguese-English bilinguals.
    Soares AP; Oliveira H; Ferreira M; Comesaña M; Macedo AF; Ferré P; Acuña-Fariña C; Hernández-Cabrera J; Fraga I
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216779. PubMed ID: 31141531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Equal Opportunity Interference: Both L1 and L2 Influence L3 Morpho-Syntactic Processing.
    Abbas N; Degani T; Prior A
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():673535. PubMed ID: 34122270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eye Movement Traces of Linguistic Knowledge in Native and Non-Native Reading.
    Berzak Y; Levy R
    Open Mind (Camb); 2023; 7():179-196. PubMed ID: 37416079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of a momentary language switch on bilingual reading: Intense at the switch but merciful downstream for L2 but not L1 readers.
    Gullifer JW; Titone D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2036-2050. PubMed ID: 30883173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency effects in monolingual and bilingual natural reading.
    Cop U; Keuleers E; Drieghe D; Duyck W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1216-34. PubMed ID: 25877485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does L2 Proficiency Impact L2-L1 Transfer While Reading L1 Collocations? Evidence From Behavioral and ERP Data.
    Otwinowska A; Marecka M; Casado A; Durlik J; Szewczyk J; Opacki M; Wodniecka Z
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():673761. PubMed ID: 34658998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual Chunking Ability Predicts Efficient or Shallow L2 Processing: Eye-Tracking Evidence From Multiword Units in Relative Clauses.
    Pulido MF
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():607621. PubMed ID: 33519614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1-L2 intermixing.
    Titone D; Libben M; Mercier J; Whitford V; Pivneva I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1412-31. PubMed ID: 21767061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers' Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading.
    Tan M; Foltz A
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():575847. PubMed ID: 33041947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of lexical characteristics and talker accent on the recognition of English words by native speakers of Korean.
    Choi MK; Holliday JJ; Munson B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Aug; 150(2):769. PubMed ID: 34470323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The effect of L1 word reading system on L2 English word recognition: a comparison of Japanese and Chinese native speakers].
    Wang L; Abe J
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2008 Oct; 79(4):342-50. PubMed ID: 19069116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reading proficiency predicts spatial eye-movement control in the first and second language.
    Gnetov D; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38330333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexible letter-position coding in Chinese-English L2 bilinguals: Evidence from eye movements.
    Man H; Parker AJ; Taylor JSH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Feb; ():17470218241229442. PubMed ID: 38247168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Eye-tracking evidence that L2 proficiency impacts access of L1 phonotactics.
    Freeman MR; Marian V
    Stud Second Lang Acquis; 2022 Jul; 44(3):759-787. PubMed ID: 36081612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic spatial organization of the occipito-temporal word form area for second language processing.
    Gao Y; Sun Y; Lu C; Ding G; Guo T; Malins JG; Booth JR; Peng D; Liu L
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Aug; 103():20-28. PubMed ID: 28610849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonological awareness and oral language proficiency in learning to read English among Chinese kindergarten children in Hong Kong.
    Yeung SS; Chan CK
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2013 Dec; 83(Pt 4):550-68. PubMed ID: 24175682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.