151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36440094)
1. An In Vitro Study of Intaglio Surface, Periphery/Palatal Seal Area, and Primary Bearing Area Adaptation of 3D-Printed Denture Base Manufactured in Various Build Angles.
Charoenphol K; Peampring C
Int J Dent; 2022; 2022():3824894. PubMed ID: 36440094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of build angle on the tissue surface adaptation of maxillary and mandibular complete denture bases manufactured by digital light processing.
Jin MC; Yoon HI; Yeo IS; Kim SH; Han JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):473-482. PubMed ID: 31227240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fit Accuracy of Complete Denture Base Fabricated by CAD/CAM Milling and 3D-Printing Methods.
Charoenphol K; Peampring C
Eur J Dent; 2023 Jul; 17(3):889-894. PubMed ID: 36513334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intaglio surface trueness of milled and 3D-printed digital maxillary and mandibular dentures: A clinical study.
Lo Russo L; Guida L; Zhurakivska K; Troiano G; Chochlidakis K; Ercoli C
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):131-139. PubMed ID: 34116839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of trueness in a denture base fabricated by using CAD-CAM systems and adaptation to the socketed surface of denture base: An in vitro study.
You SM; You SG; Lee BI; Kim JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):108-114. PubMed ID: 33239193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative analysis of denture base adaptation performance between pour and other conventional fabrication techniques.
Akaltan F; Batak B; Oguz EI; Orhan K
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):183.e1-183.e5. PubMed ID: 31767202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of build orientation and layer thickness on manufacturing accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of 3D printed complete denture bases.
Song S; Zhang J; Liu M; Li F; Bai S
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104435. PubMed ID: 36693587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM mandibular denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
Yoon HI; Hwang HJ; Ohkubo C; Han JS; Park EJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):919-926. PubMed ID: 29961610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary and mandibular complete denture bases manufactured by digital light processing: A clinical study.
Yoon SN; Oh KC; Lee SJ; Han JS; Yoon HI
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):682-689. PubMed ID: 31926657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effect of Build Orientation on the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Mandibular Complete Dentures Manufactured with a Multijet 3D Printer.
Gao H; Yang Z; Lin WS; Tan J; Chen L
J Prosthodont; 2021 Oct; 30(8):684-689. PubMed ID: 33459450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of intaglio surface trueness and margin quality of interim crowns in accordance with the build angle of stereolithography apparatus 3-dimensional printing.
Yu BY; Son K; Lee KB
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 32807402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
Hwang HJ; Lee SJ; Park EJ; Yoon HI
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 30006217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Denture Base Adaptation Fabricated Using Conventional, Subtractive, and Additive Technologies: A Volumetric Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis.
Oğuz Eİ; Kılıçarslan MA; Özcan M; Ocak M; Bilecenoğlu B; Orhan K
J Prosthodont; 2021 Mar; 30(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 33415779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intaglio surface trueness of dentures bases fabricated with 3D printing vs. conventional workflow: a clinical study.
Faur AB; Rotar RN; Jivănescu A
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):671. PubMed ID: 38851680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness.
Kalberer N; Mehl A; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):637-643. PubMed ID: 30711292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of denture base adaptation between additive and conventional fabrication techniques.
Tosun ON; Bilmenoglu C; Özdemir AK
J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):e64-e70. PubMed ID: 36495146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trueness assessment of additively manufactured maxillary complete denture bases produced at different orientations.
Cameron AB; Evans JL; Abuzar MA; Tadakamadla SK; Love RM
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):129-135. PubMed ID: 35260254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis.
Unkovskiy A; Schmidt F; Beuer F; Li P; Spintzyk S; Kraemer Fernandez P
J Clin Med; 2021 Mar; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 33806627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Dimensional Changes Between CAD-CAM Milled Complete Denture Bases and 3D Printed Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Study.
Helal MA; Abdelrahim RA; Zeidan AAE
J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(S1):11-19. PubMed ID: 35524633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptation of Complete Denture Base Fabricated by Conventional, Milling, and 3-D Printing Techniques: An
Masri G; Mortada R; Ounsi H; Alharbi N; Boulos P; Salameh Z
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Apr; 21(4):367-371. PubMed ID: 32584270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
