These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36440374)

  • 41. A multilayered graph-based framework to explore behavioural phenomena in social media conversations.
    Blanco G; Lourenço A
    Int J Med Inform; 2023 Nov; 179():105236. PubMed ID: 37776669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Characterizing the Discussion of Antibiotics in the Twittersphere: What is the Bigger Picture?
    Kendra RL; Karki S; Eickholt JL; Gandy L
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e154. PubMed ID: 26091775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. On Quantifying Diffusion of Health Information on Twitter.
    Bakal G; Kavuluru R
    IEEE EMBS Int Conf Biomed Health Inform; 2017 Feb; 2017():485-488. PubMed ID: 28736772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A natural language processing pipeline to advance the use of Twitter data for digital epidemiology of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
    Klein AZ; Cai H; Weissenbacher D; Levine LD; Gonzalez-Hernandez G
    J Biomed Inform; 2020; 112S():100076. PubMed ID: 34417007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Toward Using Twitter for PrEP-Related Interventions: An Automated Natural Language Processing Pipeline for Identifying Gay or Bisexual Men in the United States.
    Klein AZ; Meanley S; O'Connor K; Bauermeister JA; Gonzalez-Hernandez G
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2022 Apr; 8(4):e32405. PubMed ID: 35468092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Studying topic engagement and synergy among candidates for 2020 US Elections.
    Baxi MK; Sharma R; Mago V
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):136. PubMed ID: 36118938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Using twitter to examine smoking behavior and perceptions of emerging tobacco products.
    Myslín M; Zhu SH; Chapman W; Conway M
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e174. PubMed ID: 23989137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate.
    Vilella S; Semeraro A; Paolotti D; Ruffo G
    EPJ Data Sci; 2022; 11(1):29. PubMed ID: 35602319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A comparative study of the characteristics of hate speech propagators and their behaviours over Twitter social media platform.
    Perera S; Meedin N; Caldera M; Perera I; Ahangama S
    Heliyon; 2023 Aug; 9(8):e19097. PubMed ID: 37636360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Gender-Based Violence Narratives in Internet-Based Conversations in Nigeria: Social Listening Study.
    Silva M; Anaba U; Jani Tulsani N; Sripad P; Walker J; Aisiri A
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Sep; 25():e46814. PubMed ID: 37713260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Unmasking the Twitter Discourses on Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic: User Cluster-Based BERT Topic Modeling Approach.
    Xu WW; Tshimula JM; Dubé È; Graham JE; Greyson D; MacDonald NE; Meyer SB
    JMIR Infodemiology; 2022; 2(2):e41198. PubMed ID: 36536763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter.
    Kornides ML; Badlis S; Head KJ; Putt M; Cappella J; Gonzalez-Hernadez G
    J Behav Med; 2023 Apr; 46(1-2):239-252. PubMed ID: 35896853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Insights From Twitter Conversations on Lupus and Reproductive Health: Protocol for a Content Analysis.
    Stens O; Weisman MH; Simard J; Reuter K
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2020 Aug; 9(8):e15623. PubMed ID: 32844753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Trend analysis of COVID-19 mis/disinformation narratives-A 3-year study.
    Kotseva B; Vianini I; Nikolaidis N; Faggiani N; Potapova K; Gasparro C; Steiner Y; Scornavacche J; Jacquet G; Dragu V; Della Rocca L; Bucci S; Podavini A; Verile M; Macmillan C; Linge JP
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0291423. PubMed ID: 37976242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Text embedding techniques for efficient clustering of twitter data.
    Ravi J; Kulkarni S
    Evol Intell; 2023 Feb; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 36777033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Applying Multiple Data Collection Tools to Quantify Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Communication on Twitter.
    Massey PM; Leader A; Yom-Tov E; Budenz A; Fisher K; Klassen AC
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Dec; 18(12):e318. PubMed ID: 27919863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Classification of Twitter Users Who Tweet About E-Cigarettes.
    Kim A; Miano T; Chew R; Eggers M; Nonnemaker J
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2017 Sep; 3(3):e63. PubMed ID: 28951381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Utilizing Twitter data for analysis of chemotherapy.
    Zhang L; Hall M; Bastola D
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 Dec; 120():92-100. PubMed ID: 30409350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Understanding Public Perceptions and Discussions on Opioids Through Twitter: Cross-Sectional Infodemiology Study.
    Carabot F; Fraile-Martínez O; Donat-Vargas C; Santoma J; Garcia-Montero C; Pinto da Costa M; Molina-Ruiz RM; Ortega MA; Alvarez-Mon M; Alvarez-Mon MA
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Oct; 25():e50013. PubMed ID: 37906234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Scoliosis surgery in social media: a natural language processing approach to analyzing the online patient perspective.
    Dominy CL; Arvind V; Tang JE; Bellaire CP; Pasik SD; Kim JS; Cho SK
    Spine Deform; 2022 Mar; 10(2):239-246. PubMed ID: 34709599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.