These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36440558)
1. Dynamics of cooperative networks associated with gender among South Indian Tamils. Simpson CR; Power EA Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1868):20210437. PubMed ID: 36440558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cooperation beyond consanguinity: post-marital residence, delineations of kin and social support among South Indian Tamils. Power EA; Ready E Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Sep; 374(1780):20180070. PubMed ID: 31303166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does gender structure social networks across domains of cooperation? An exploration of gendered networks among matrilineal and patrilineal Mosuo. Mattison SM; MacLaren NG; Sum CY; Shenk MK; Blumenfield T; Wander K Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1868):20210436. PubMed ID: 36440564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New perspectives on the evolution of women's cooperation. Fox SA; Scelza B; Silk J; Kramer KL Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1868):20210424. PubMed ID: 36440567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Social Support and Network Formation in a Small-Scale Horticulturalist Population. Simpson CR Sci Data; 2022 Sep; 9(1):570. PubMed ID: 36109560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Female cooperation: evolutionary, cross-cultural and ethnographic evidence. Kramer KL Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1868):20210425. PubMed ID: 36440565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Female cooperative labour networks in hunter-gatherers and horticulturalists. Kraft TS; Cummings DK; Venkataraman VV; Alami S; Beheim B; Hooper P; Seabright E; Trumble BC; Stieglitz J; Kaplan H; Endicott KL; Endicott KM; Gurven M Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1868):20210431. PubMed ID: 36440571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thriving together: the benefits of women's social ties for physical, psychological and relationship health. Bedrov A; Gable SL Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1868):20210441. PubMed ID: 36440568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When is bigger better? The effects of group size on the evolution of helping behaviours. Powers ST; Lehmann L Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 May; 92(2):902-920. PubMed ID: 26989856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Co-evolution of online social networks and syphilis incidence among young black men who have sex with men. Young LE; Fujimoto K Soc Sci Med; 2021 Mar; 272():113764. PubMed ID: 33592396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. No strong evidence for universal gender differences in the development of cooperative behaviour across societies. House B; Silk JB; McAuliffe K Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1868):20210439. PubMed ID: 36440561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gender differences in cooperation across 20 societies: a meta-analysis. Spadaro G; Jin S; Balliet D Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1868):20210438. PubMed ID: 36440556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: cross-cultural evidence from social networking. David-Barrett T; Rotkirch A; Carney J; Behncke Izquierdo I; Krems JA; Townley D; McDaniell E; Byrne-Smith A; Dunbar RI PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118329. PubMed ID: 25775258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Age and Gender Differences in Social Network Composition and Social Support Among Older Rural South Africans: Findings From the HAALSI Study. Harling G; Morris KA; Manderson L; Perkins JM; Berkman LF J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2020 Jan; 75(1):148-159. PubMed ID: 29590472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clustering in large networks does not promote upstream reciprocity. Masuda N PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e25190. PubMed ID: 21998641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Networks of reliable reputations and cooperation: a review. Takács K; Gross J; Testori M; Letina S; Kenny AR; Power EA; Wittek RPM Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Nov; 376(1838):20200297. PubMed ID: 34601917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sustaining the potential for cooperation as female competitive strategy. Cassar A; Rigdon M Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1868):20210440. PubMed ID: 36988499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The evolution of generalized reciprocity in social interaction networks. Voelkl B Theor Popul Biol; 2015 Sep; 104():17-25. PubMed ID: 26187659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sex differences in cooperative coalitions: a mammalian perspective. Smith JE; Jaeggi AV; Holmes RK; Silk JB Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1868):20210426. PubMed ID: 36440559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]