These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3644098)
21. [Cost analysis of procedural fee for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty at six Japanese hospitals]. Chino M J Cardiol; 2001 Feb; 37(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 11255699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Re-using equipment. The case for re-use. Simmons B Nurs Times; 1987 Mar 18-24; 83(11):26-9. PubMed ID: 3645570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Reusables may slow rising tide of laparoscopic surgery costs. Souhrada L Mater Manag Health Care; 1993 Feb; 2(2):22. PubMed ID: 10171424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Present application situation of medical consumble materials and the standard management]. Chong YB; Zhao ML; Li N Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 29(6):460-1. PubMed ID: 16494066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Economics and hospital hygiene]. Scheidegger C Maroc Med; 1974 Oct; 54(583):518-9. PubMed ID: 4453137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Hospital study reveals switch to disposables in operating room packs would inflate costs. Laund News; 1984 Feb; 10(2):3, 15. PubMed ID: 10264804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Durability and function of disposable versus reusable laparoscopic instrumentation. Bessell JR; Patkin M; Isabel L Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):143-6. PubMed ID: 7552132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Training mentally retarded females to use sanitary napkins. Hamilton J; Allen P; Stephens L; Davall E Ment Retard; 1969 Feb; 7(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 5780633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Reusable versus disposable biopsy forceps: an economic comparison]. Jörgensen E; Busch C; Ujlaky R Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Oct; 46(10):1185-7. PubMed ID: 18937187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Why we use reusable surgical packs. Christensen PL Text Rent; 1984 Feb; 67(6):30-4. PubMed ID: 10264867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost-effectiveness and safety of reusable tracheal suction tubes. Nanta P; Senarat W; Tribuddharat C; Danchaivijitr S J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Dec; 88 Suppl 10():S86-8. PubMed ID: 16850647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of disposable and glass mercury thermometers. Board M Nurs Times; 1995 Aug 16-22; 91(33):36-7. PubMed ID: 7667128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Custom kits and trays: will they meet your hospital's needs? Oliver J; Klenk K J Healthc Mater Manage; 1986; 4(3):26-32. PubMed ID: 10276346 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Sterilizable syringes: excessive risk or cost-effective option? Battersby A; Feilden R; Nelson C Bull World Health Organ; 1999; 77(10):812-9. PubMed ID: 10593029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Direct hospital costs in coronary bypass surgery. Konttinen M; Harjola PT; Heinonen M; Valle M; Merikallio E; Frick MH Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1985; 74(6):265-9. PubMed ID: 3879428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Determination of use cost: a statistical approach. Kovacs GL Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1981 May; 2(4):25-32. PubMed ID: 10251031 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Re-sterilization of disposable products: a gamble]. Haindl H Pflege Z; 2002 Feb; 55(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 12640997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Disposables, convenience kits are costing hospitals an unnecessary fortune. Schlosser R Hosp Mater Manage; 1991 Sep; 16(9):14-5. PubMed ID: 10114527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Cost/benefit study of reusable and disposable OR draping materials. Murphy L J Healthc Mater Manage; 1993 Apr; 11(3):44-8. PubMed ID: 10124965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]