154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36441612)
1. Effects of six kinds of sperm staining methods on human sperm size and evaluation of their staining effects.
Xu YH; Lu JC; Tang SS
J Clin Lab Anal; 2022 Dec; 36(12):e24794. PubMed ID: 36441612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Morphology and morphometry of sperm in Kurdish stallions, a local breed from western Iran.
Nooroozian A; Goodarzi N; Tafti RD
Reprod Domest Anim; 2024 Jan; 59(1):e14534. PubMed ID: 38268217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two staining and evaluation methods used for computerized human sperm morphology evaluations.
Coetzee K; Kruger TF; Vandendael A; de Villiers A; Lombard CJ
Andrologia; 1997; 29(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 9197916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of normal sperm morphology outcomes from two different computer-assisted semen analysis systems.
Coetzee K; Bermes N; Krause W; Menkveld R
Andrologia; 2001 May; 33(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 11380331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of human sperm morphology by strict criteria: comparison of wet preparation versus stained with the modified Diff-Quik method.
Oral E; Yetis O; Elibol F; Senol H; Irez T; Aksu FM
Arch Androl; 2002; 48(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 12137592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dimensions of human ejaculated spermatozoa in Papanicolaou-stained seminal and swim-up smears obtained from the Integrated Semen Analysis System (ISAS(®)).
Bellastella G; Cooper TG; Battaglia M; Ströse A; Torres I; Hellenkemper B; Soler C; Sinisi AA
Asian J Androl; 2010 Nov; 12(6):871-9. PubMed ID: 20852650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The staining pattern of human sperm with Diff Quik: relationship with sperm head morphology and a sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA).
Moska N; Murray E; Wakefield P; Matson P
Reprod Biol; 2011 Mar; 11(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 21455281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of different staining and washing procedures on the results of human sperm morphology evaluation by manual and computerised methods.
Menkveld R; Lacquet FA; Kruger TF; Lombard CJ; Sanchez Sarmiento CA; de Villiers A
Andrologia; 1997; 29(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 9049005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of staining methods on human sperm morphometrics using HT CASA II.
Chaiya J; Vinayanuvattikhun N; Tanprasertkul C; Chaidarun T; Mebuathong T; Kaset C
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 51(3):102322. PubMed ID: 35063721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of staining and sampling procedures on goat sperm morphometry using the Sperm Class Analyzer.
Hidalgo M; Rodríguez I; Dorado J
Theriogenology; 2006 Sep; 66(4):996-1003. PubMed ID: 16620924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used.
Maree L; du Plessis SS; Menkveld R; van der Horst G
Hum Reprod; 2010 Jun; 25(6):1369-82. PubMed ID: 20400771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of stains and investigators on assessment of morphology of canine spermatozoa.
Root Kustritz MV; Olson PN; Johnston SD; Root TK
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 1998; 34(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 9657169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Viability and acrosome staining of stallion spermatozoa by Chicago sky blue and Giemsa.
Kútvölgyi G; Stefler J; Kovács A
Biotech Histochem; 2006; 81(4-6):109-17. PubMed ID: 17129993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual use of Diff-Quik-like stains for the simultaneous evaluation of human sperm morphology and chromatin status.
Sousa AP; Tavares RS; Velez de la Calle JF; Figueiredo H; Almeida V; Almeida-Santos T; Ramalho-Santos J
Hum Reprod; 2009 Jan; 24(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 18835873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of human sperm chromatin status after selection using a modified Diff-Quik stain indicates embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization.
Tavares RS; Silva AF; Lourenço B; Almeida-Santos T; Sousa AP; Ramalho-Santos J
Andrology; 2013 Nov; 1(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 24124136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of staining method and clinician experience on the evaluation of stallion sperm morphology.
Murcia-Robayo RY; Jouanisson E; Beauchamp G; Diaw M
Anim Reprod Sci; 2018 Jan; 188():165-169. PubMed ID: 29198956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A quick, reliable staining technique for human sperm morphology.
Kruger TF; Ackerman SB; Simmons KF; Swanson RJ; Brugo SS; Acosta AA
Arch Androl; 1987; 18(3):275-7. PubMed ID: 2445315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Descriptive analysis of sperm head morphometry in Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica): optimum sampling procedure and staining methods using Sperm-Class Analyzer ®.
Esteso MC; Rodríguez E; Toledano-Díaz A; Castaño C; Pradiee J; López-Sebastián A; Santiago-Moreno J
Anim Reprod Sci; 2015 Apr; 155():42-9. PubMed ID: 25721563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histologic assessment of Helicobacter pylori status after therapy: comparison of Giemsa, Diff-Quik, and Genta stains.
El-Zimaity HM; Segura AM; Genta RM; Graham DY
Mod Pathol; 1998 Mar; 11(3):288-91. PubMed ID: 9521477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of human sperm morphology using strict criteria after Diff-Quik staining: correlation of morphology with fertilization in vitro.
Enginsu ME; Dumoulin JC; Pieters MH; Bras M; Evers JL; Geraedts JP
Hum Reprod; 1991 Jul; 6(6):854-8. PubMed ID: 1721921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
