These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36441778)

  • 1. Effect of six different autorefractor designs on the precision and accuracy of refractive error measurement.
    Venkataraman AP; Brautaset R; Domínguez-Vicent A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0278269. PubMed ID: 36441778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
    Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the Accuracy and Repeatability of Refractive Error Estimates Depend on the Measurement Principle of Autorefractors?
    Padhy D; Bharadwaj SR; Nayak S; Rath S; Das T
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 10(1):2. PubMed ID: 33505769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ametropia detection using a novel, compact wavefront autorefractor.
    Hernández CS; Gil A; Zaytouny A; Casares I; Poderoso J; de Lara A; Wehse A; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E; Alejandre-Alba N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Mar; 44(2):311-320. PubMed ID: 38084770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
    Durr NJ; Dave SR; Vera-Diaz FA; Lim D; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S; Thorn F; Lage E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1140-7. PubMed ID: 26580271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Instrument Design and Technique on the Precision and Accuracy of Objective Refraction Measurement.
    Domínguez-Vicent A; Al-Soboh L; Brautaset R; Venkataraman AP
    J Clin Med; 2020 Sep; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 32977411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of refraction--a literature review.
    Goss DA; Grosvenor T
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):619-30. PubMed ID: 8942135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of autorefraction in an adult Indian population.
    Kumar RS; Moe CA; Kumar D; Rackenchath MV; A V SD; Nagaraj S; Wittberg DM; Stamper RL; Keenan JD
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251583. PubMed ID: 34010350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comparison of Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in an Academic Optometry Clinic.
    Kemchoknatee P; Sunlakaviset P; Khieokhoen N; Srisombut T; Tangon D
    Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37448. PubMed ID: 37182059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of Viewing Conditions and Vision Anomalies on Accuracy and Dynamics of Noncycloplegic Autorefraction.
    Kiermasz J; Sobol M; Pniewski J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2022 Dec; 99(12):844-852. PubMed ID: 36594753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the SVOne Handheld Autorefractor in a Pediatric Population.
    Rosenfield M; Ciuffreda KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 27668640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of refractive error measurements by three different models of autorefractors and subjective refraction in young adults.
    Wosik J; Patrzykont M; Pniewski J
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 Apr; 36(4):B1-B6. PubMed ID: 31044948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy and accommodation capability of a handheld autorefractor.
    Wesemann W; Dick B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2000 Jan; 26(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 10646148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laboratory, clinical, and kindergarten test of a new eccentric infrared photorefractor (PowerRefractor).
    Choi M; Weiss S; Schaeffel F; Seidemann A; Howland HC; Wilhelm B; Wilhelm H
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Oct; 77(10):537-48. PubMed ID: 11100892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Open versus closed view autorefraction in young adults.
    Nagra M; Akhtar A; Huntjens B; Campbell P
    J Optom; 2021; 14(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 32792330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the SVOne: A Handheld, Smartphone-Based Autorefractor.
    Ciuffreda KJ; Rosenfield M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1133-9. PubMed ID: 26540478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
    Lebow KA; Campbell CE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 500 autorefractor and the Nidek AR-1000 autorefractor.
    Kinge B; Midelfart A; Jacobsen G
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Jan; 80(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8664229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of refractive errors in young myopes using the COAS Shack-Hartmann aberrometer.
    Salmon TO; West RW; Gasser W; Kenmore T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jan; 80(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 12553539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.