These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36442176)

  • 1. Empowering self-direction in return to work of employees with low and high levels of education: A qualitative comparative study.
    Hoefsmit N; Pennings B; Houkes I
    Work; 2023; 74(3):859-869. PubMed ID: 36442176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Return to work of employees with low levels of education: The employers' role and perspective.
    Hoefsmit N; Houkes I
    Work; 2022; 73(4):1189-1202. PubMed ID: 36093655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-directing return-to-work: Employees' perspective.
    Smeets J; Hoefsmit N; Houkes I
    Work; 2019; 64(4):797-807. PubMed ID: 31815719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Work resumption at the price of distrust: a qualitative study on return to work legislation in the Netherlands.
    Hoefsmit N; de Rijk A; Houkes I
    BMC Public Health; 2013 Feb; 13():153. PubMed ID: 23421974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Return to work with chronic pain: employers' and employees' views.
    Wainwright E; Wainwright D; Keogh E; Eccleston C
    Occup Med (Lond); 2013 Oct; 63(7):501-6. PubMed ID: 24027219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Employers' experience of employees with cancer: trajectories of complex communication.
    Tiedtke CM; Dierckx de Casterlé B; Frings-Dresen MHW; De Boer AGEM; Greidanus MA; Tamminga SJ; De Rijk AE
    J Cancer Surviv; 2017 Oct; 11(5):562-577. PubMed ID: 28710544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What Employer Actions Are Considered Most Important for the Return to Work of Employees with Cancer? A Delphi Study Among Employees and Employers.
    Greidanus MA; Tamminga SJ; de Rijk AE; Frings-Dresen MHW; de Boer AGEM
    J Occup Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 29(2):406-422. PubMed ID: 30027426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Employers' Experience on Involvement in Sickness Absence/Return to Work Support for Employees with Cancer in Small Enterprises.
    Tiedtke C; De Rijk A; Van den Broeck A; Godderis L
    J Occup Rehabil; 2020 Dec; 30(4):635-645. PubMed ID: 32246294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Return-to-Work Self-Efficacy and Actual Return to Work Among Long-Term Sick-Listed Employees.
    Volker D; Zijlstra-Vlasveld MC; Brouwers EP; van Lomwel AG; van der Feltz-Cornelis CM
    J Occup Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 25(2):423-31. PubMed ID: 25354750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethical aspects of the coordination of return-to-work among employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders: a qualitative study.
    Holmlund L; Sandman L; Hellman T; Kwak L; Björk Brämberg E
    Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Jun; 45(13):2118-2127. PubMed ID: 35676198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of a blended web-based intervention on return to work for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial.
    Volker D; Zijlstra-Vlasveld MC; Anema JR; Beekman AT; Brouwers EP; Emons WH; van Lomwel AG; van der Feltz-Cornelis CM
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 May; 17(5):e116. PubMed ID: 25972279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How Can Supervisors Contribute to the Return to Work of Employees Who have Experienced Depression?
    Negrini A; Corbière M; Lecomte T; Coutu MF; Nieuwenhuijsen K; St-Arnaud L; Durand MJ; Gragnano A; Berbiche D
    J Occup Rehabil; 2018 Jun; 28(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 28660364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Work Characteristics and Return to Work in Long-Term Sick-Listed Employees with Depressive Symptoms.
    Huijs JJJM; Koppes LLJ; Taris TW; Blonk RWB
    J Occup Rehabil; 2017 Dec; 27(4):612-622. PubMed ID: 28132111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring Employer Perspectives on Their Supportive Role in Accommodating Workers with Disabilities to Promote Sustainable RTW: A Qualitative Study.
    Jansen J; Boot CRL; Alma MA; Brouwer S
    J Occup Rehabil; 2022 Mar; 32(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 35166974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Environmental and personal factors that support early return-to-work: a qualitative study using the ICF as a framework.
    Hoefsmit N; Houkes I; Nijhuis F
    Work; 2014; 48(2):203-15. PubMed ID: 23803441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The MiLES intervention targeting employers to promote successful return to work of employees with cancer: design of a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Greidanus MA; de Boer AGEM; de Rijk AE; Frings-Dresen MHW; Tamminga SJ
    Trials; 2020 Apr; 21(1):363. PubMed ID: 32345344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Job demands and decision control predicted return to work: the rapid-RTW cohort study.
    Haveraaen LA; Skarpaas LS; Aas RW
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):154. PubMed ID: 28152995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supporting the return to work of breast cancer survivors: perspectives from Canadian employer representatives.
    Bilodeau K; Gouin MM; Fadhlaoui A; Porro B
    J Cancer Surviv; 2024 Aug; 18(4):1384-1392. PubMed ID: 37140676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Return to work following breast cancer treatment: the employers' side.
    Tiedtke C; Donceel P; de Rijk A; Dierckx de Casterlé B
    J Occup Rehabil; 2014 Sep; 24(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 23982854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors promoting a successful return to work: from an employer and employee perspective.
    Jakobsen K; Lillefjell M
    Scand J Occup Ther; 2014 Jan; 21(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 24289662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.