145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36442176)
1. Empowering self-direction in return to work of employees with low and high levels of education: A qualitative comparative study.
Hoefsmit N; Pennings B; Houkes I
Work; 2023; 74(3):859-869. PubMed ID: 36442176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Return to work of employees with low levels of education: The employers' role and perspective.
Hoefsmit N; Houkes I
Work; 2022; 73(4):1189-1202. PubMed ID: 36093655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Self-directing return-to-work: Employees' perspective.
Smeets J; Hoefsmit N; Houkes I
Work; 2019; 64(4):797-807. PubMed ID: 31815719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Work resumption at the price of distrust: a qualitative study on return to work legislation in the Netherlands.
Hoefsmit N; de Rijk A; Houkes I
BMC Public Health; 2013 Feb; 13():153. PubMed ID: 23421974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Return to work with chronic pain: employers' and employees' views.
Wainwright E; Wainwright D; Keogh E; Eccleston C
Occup Med (Lond); 2013 Oct; 63(7):501-6. PubMed ID: 24027219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Employers' experience of employees with cancer: trajectories of complex communication.
Tiedtke CM; Dierckx de Casterlé B; Frings-Dresen MHW; De Boer AGEM; Greidanus MA; Tamminga SJ; De Rijk AE
J Cancer Surviv; 2017 Oct; 11(5):562-577. PubMed ID: 28710544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What Employer Actions Are Considered Most Important for the Return to Work of Employees with Cancer? A Delphi Study Among Employees and Employers.
Greidanus MA; Tamminga SJ; de Rijk AE; Frings-Dresen MHW; de Boer AGEM
J Occup Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 29(2):406-422. PubMed ID: 30027426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Employers' Experience on Involvement in Sickness Absence/Return to Work Support for Employees with Cancer in Small Enterprises.
Tiedtke C; De Rijk A; Van den Broeck A; Godderis L
J Occup Rehabil; 2020 Dec; 30(4):635-645. PubMed ID: 32246294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Return-to-Work Self-Efficacy and Actual Return to Work Among Long-Term Sick-Listed Employees.
Volker D; Zijlstra-Vlasveld MC; Brouwers EP; van Lomwel AG; van der Feltz-Cornelis CM
J Occup Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 25(2):423-31. PubMed ID: 25354750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical aspects of the coordination of return-to-work among employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders: a qualitative study.
Holmlund L; Sandman L; Hellman T; Kwak L; Björk Brämberg E
Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Jun; 45(13):2118-2127. PubMed ID: 35676198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of a blended web-based intervention on return to work for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Volker D; Zijlstra-Vlasveld MC; Anema JR; Beekman AT; Brouwers EP; Emons WH; van Lomwel AG; van der Feltz-Cornelis CM
J Med Internet Res; 2015 May; 17(5):e116. PubMed ID: 25972279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How Can Supervisors Contribute to the Return to Work of Employees Who have Experienced Depression?
Negrini A; Corbière M; Lecomte T; Coutu MF; Nieuwenhuijsen K; St-Arnaud L; Durand MJ; Gragnano A; Berbiche D
J Occup Rehabil; 2018 Jun; 28(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 28660364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Work Characteristics and Return to Work in Long-Term Sick-Listed Employees with Depressive Symptoms.
Huijs JJJM; Koppes LLJ; Taris TW; Blonk RWB
J Occup Rehabil; 2017 Dec; 27(4):612-622. PubMed ID: 28132111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring Employer Perspectives on Their Supportive Role in Accommodating Workers with Disabilities to Promote Sustainable RTW: A Qualitative Study.
Jansen J; Boot CRL; Alma MA; Brouwer S
J Occup Rehabil; 2022 Mar; 32(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 35166974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Environmental and personal factors that support early return-to-work: a qualitative study using the ICF as a framework.
Hoefsmit N; Houkes I; Nijhuis F
Work; 2014; 48(2):203-15. PubMed ID: 23803441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The MiLES intervention targeting employers to promote successful return to work of employees with cancer: design of a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Greidanus MA; de Boer AGEM; de Rijk AE; Frings-Dresen MHW; Tamminga SJ
Trials; 2020 Apr; 21(1):363. PubMed ID: 32345344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Job demands and decision control predicted return to work: the rapid-RTW cohort study.
Haveraaen LA; Skarpaas LS; Aas RW
BMC Public Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):154. PubMed ID: 28152995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Return to work following breast cancer treatment: the employers' side.
Tiedtke C; Donceel P; de Rijk A; Dierckx de Casterlé B
J Occup Rehabil; 2014 Sep; 24(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 23982854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors promoting a successful return to work: from an employer and employee perspective.
Jakobsen K; Lillefjell M
Scand J Occup Ther; 2014 Jan; 21(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 24289662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sustained return to work and work participation after a new legislation obligating employers to notify prolonged sickness absence.
Halonen JI; Solovieva S; Virta LJ; Laaksonen M; Martimo KP; Hiljanen I; Lallukka T; Autti-Rämö I; Viikari-Juntura E
Scand J Public Health; 2018 Feb; 46(19_suppl):65-73. PubMed ID: 29471755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
