These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36443784)

  • 1. Validation of the Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 (ObsQoR-11T) after cesarean delivery.
    Ozkan G; Kara U; Ince ME; Ozdemir O; Ulubay M; Senkal S
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2022 Nov; 20(1):155. PubMed ID: 36443784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the Thai version of the obstetric quality of recovery score (obsqor-10-Thai) after elective cesarean delivery.
    Dusitkasem S; Jindapitak J; Arnuntasupakul V; Lekprasert V; Bumrungphuet S; Sukying C; Komonhirun R; Sangkum L
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2023 Mar; 23(1):72. PubMed ID: 36882676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of a Portuguese version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10-Portuguese).
    Mathias LAST; Carlos RV; Siaulys MM; Gabriades P; Guo N; Domingue B; O'Carroll J; Carvalho B; Sultan P
    Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2022 Jun; 41(3):101085. PubMed ID: 35487408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of an obstetric quality of recovery scoring tool (ObsQoR-11) after elective caesarean delivery in a developing country: a prospective observational study.
    Kumar S; Ashok V; Jain D; Arora A; Singh A; Sikka P
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2022 Feb; 49():103235. PubMed ID: 34810053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation and Clinical Utility of the Korean Version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery Score (ObsQoR-11) Following Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.
    Kang R; Lee S; Lee E; Cho YJ; Jeong JS; Choi SJ; Gwak MS; Sim WS; Kim DK; Ko JS
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Jan; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35204382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10.
    Kozanhan B; Yıldız M; Polat A; Günenç O; Tutar SM; İyisoy MS; Kulhan NG; Sultan P
    Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2022 Oct; 50(5):366-372. PubMed ID: 36301286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linguistic validation of a widely used recovery score: quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15).
    Kara U; Şimşek F; Kamburoğlu H; Özhan MÖ; Alakuş Ü; İnce ME; Eksert S; Özkan G; Eşkin MB; Şenkal S
    Turk J Med Sci; 2022 Apr; 52(2):427-435. PubMed ID: 36161615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and validation of a Spanish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item score (ObsQoR-10-Spanish).
    Guevara J; Sánchez C; Organista-Montaño J; Domingue BW; Guo N; Sultan P
    BJA Open; 2024 Jun; 10():100269. PubMed ID: 38560622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-11) following non-elective caesarean delivery.
    Ciechanowicz S; Howle R; Heppolette C; Nakhjavani B; Carvalho B; Sultan P
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2019 Aug; 39():51-59. PubMed ID: 30885691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and evaluation of an obstetric quality-of-recovery score (ObsQoR-11) after elective Caesarean delivery.
    Ciechanowicz S; Setty T; Robson E; Sathasivam C; Chazapis M; Dick J; Carvalho B; Sultan P
    Br J Anaesth; 2019 Jan; 122(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 30579408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of translated Obstetric Quality of Recovery (ObsQoR-10A) score after nonelective cesarean delivery (CD) in an Arabic-speaking population.
    Mukarram S; Ali S; Zulqurnain M; Alkadi IAM; Alhatlan AI; Abbasi MZH; Mushtaq MQ; AbuHammad AY; Shahid K; Waqas A; Shafqat A
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2022; 16(4):390-400. PubMed ID: 36337390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of spontaneous versus operative vaginal delivery using Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10): An observational cohort study.
    Sultan P; Kormendy F; Nishimura S; Carvalho B; Guo N; Papageorgiou C
    J Clin Anesth; 2020 Aug; 63():109781. PubMed ID: 32203873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of Hindi version of the obstetric quality of recovery score-11 (ObsQoR-11 H) following elective caesarean section.
    Gupta S; Choudhary S; Choudhary V; Jain K; Bhatia N; Gupta A
    Indian J Anaesth; 2023 Nov; 67(Suppl 4):S251-S256. PubMed ID: 38187972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of inpatient postpartum recovery using the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 patient-reported outcome measure: a single-center observational study.
    Sultan P; Kamath N; Carvalho B; Bansal P; Elkhateb R; Dougan S; Whittington J; Guo N; El-Sayed Y; Mhyre J; Sharawi N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2020 Nov; 2(4):100202. PubMed ID: 33345919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population.
    Demumieux F; Ludes PO; Diemunsch P; Bennett-Guerrero E; Lujic M; Lefebvre F; Noll E
    Br J Anaesth; 2020 Jun; 124(6):761-767. PubMed ID: 32303379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of Chinese version of a global anesthetic recovery questionnaire: A multicenter observational trial on ObsQoR-11.
    Chou WH; Lee SO; Sun MH; Tseng YC; Chan KC; Chen YH; Wu CY
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2023 Jun; 122(6):479-485. PubMed ID: 36593133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Translation and validation of the French version of the ObsQoR-10 questionnaire for the evaluation of recovery after delivery: the ObsQoR-10-French.
    Mazoué É; Veret M; Corroënne R; Mercier MB; Lomo H; Verhaeghe C; Lasocki S; Bouet PE; Léger M
    BJA Open; 2023 Sep; 7():100221. PubMed ID: 37638079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain.
    Melikoglu MA; Kocabas H; Sezer I; Bilgilisoy M; Tuncer T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(6):E219-24. PubMed ID: 19282728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire for physiotherapists.
    Büyükaşık M; Özkeskin M; Özden F
    Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 44(12):2908-2914. PubMed ID: 33226865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hindi translation and cultural adaptation of the quality of recovery score-40 (QoR-40 score): A validation study.
    Govil N; Rathore R; Tiwari A; Garg PK; Parag K; Mishra P
    Indian J Anaesth; 2024 Jun; 68(6):533-539. PubMed ID: 38903262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.