These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36446801)

  • 1. Urban water supply systems' resilience under earthquake scenario.
    Bata MH; Carriveau R; Ting DS
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):20555. PubMed ID: 36446801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seismic Resilience of Rural Water Supply Systems; Factor Analysis of Cases Set in Sichuan Province, China.
    Zhou W; Kalonji G; Chen C; Martek I
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():840379. PubMed ID: 35273942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A SOFTWARE FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE RESILIENCE OF DRINKING WATER SYSTEMS TO DISASTERS WITH AN EXAMPLE EARTHQUAKE CASE STUDY.
    Klise KA; Bynum M; Moriarty D; Murray R
    Environ Model Softw; 2017 Sep; 95():420-431. PubMed ID: 30505210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphogenesis of Urban Water Distribution Networks: A Spatiotemporal Planning Approach for Cost-Efficient and Reliable Supply.
    Zischg J; Rauch W; Sitzenfrei R
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Sep; 20(9):. PubMed ID: 33265797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A three-staged framework for measuring water supply resilience in rural China based on PLS-SEM.
    Zhou W; Kalonji G; Chen C; Zheng H; Martek I
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):4323. PubMed ID: 35279670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.
    Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA
    Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Technological System for Post-Earthquake Damage Scenarios Based on the Monitoring by Means of an Urban Seismic Network.
    Costanzo A; Falcone S; D'Alessandro A; Vitale G; Giovinazzi S; Morici M; Dall'Asta A; Buongiorno MF
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(23):. PubMed ID: 34883889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating seismic risk by MCDM and machine learning for the eastern coast of India.
    Rai AK; Malakar S; Goswami S
    Environ Monit Assess; 2024 Apr; 196(5):471. PubMed ID: 38658399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation method on seismic risk of substation in strong earthquake area.
    Cui J; Che A; Li S; Cheng Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0258792. PubMed ID: 34855758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid Estimation of Earthquake Fatalities in Mainland China Based on Physical Simulation and Empirical Statistics-A Case Study of the 2021 Yangbi Earthquake.
    Li Y; Zhang Z; Wang W; Feng X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 35682403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation and promotion strategy of resilience of urban water supply system under flood and drought disasters.
    Li Z; Zhao H; Liu J; Zhang J; Shao Z
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):7404. PubMed ID: 35523918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hydraulic performance benchmarking for effective management of water distribution networks: An innovative composite index-based approach.
    Zaman D; Gupta AK; Uddameri V; Tiwari MK; Ghosal PS
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Dec; 299():113603. PubMed ID: 34454199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Challenges of emergency evacuation of residential areas caused by chemical release due to the earthquake: a Natech event scenario.
    Shafiei Moghaddam P; Jahangiri K; Sohrabizadeh S; Hassani N; Hoseini Moghaddam M; Monazami Tehrani G
    J Inj Violence Res; 2022 Jan; 14(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 35017450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study of Building Safety Monitoring by Using Cost-Effective MEMS Accelerometers for Rapid After-Earthquake Assessment with Missing Data.
    Lin JF; Li XY; Wang J; Wang LX; Hu XX; Liu JX
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 34770632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancing reclaimed water distribution network resilience with cost-effective meshing.
    Martínez D; Bergillos S; Corominas L; Comas J; Wang F; Kooij R; Calle E
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Aug; 938():173051. PubMed ID: 38740194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Agent-Based Recovery Model for Seismic Resilience Evaluation of Electrified Communities.
    Sun L; Stojadinovic B; Sansavini G
    Risk Anal; 2019 Jul; 39(7):1597-1614. PubMed ID: 30699236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hydraulically informed graph theoretic measure of link criticality for the resilience analysis of water distribution networks.
    Ulusoy AJ; Stoianov I; Chazerain A
    Appl Netw Sci; 2018; 3(1):31. PubMed ID: 30839751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MyShake: A smartphone seismic network for earthquake early warning and beyond.
    Kong Q; Allen RM; Schreier L; Kwon YW
    Sci Adv; 2016 Feb; 2(2):e1501055. PubMed ID: 26933682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Life-cycle energy impacts for adapting an urban water supply system to droughts.
    Lam KL; Stokes-Draut JR; Horvath A; Lane JL; Kenway SJ; Lant PA
    Water Res; 2017 Dec; 127():139-149. PubMed ID: 29035767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abnormal groundwater levels and microbial communities in the Pohang Enhanced Geothermal System site wells pre- and post-M
    Ryu HS; Kim H; Lee JY; Kaown D; Lee KK
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 810():152305. PubMed ID: 34906576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.