125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36447350)
1. Crossing the Cervicothoracic Junction: A Review of the Current Literature.
Vickery JW; Varas EE; Abtahi AM
Clin Spine Surg; 2022 Dec; 35(10):451-457. PubMed ID: 36447350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Kretzer RM; Hu N; Umekoji H; Sciubba DM; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study.
Hong JT; Tomoyuki T; Jain A; Orías AAE; Inoue N; An HS
Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2417-2424. PubMed ID: 28752245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selecting the lowest instrumented vertebra in a multilevel posterior cervical fusion across the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical investigation.
Gelfand Y; Franco D; Kinon MD; De la Garza Ramos R; Yassari R; Harris JA; Flamand S; McGuckin JP; Gonzalez JL; Mahoney JM; Bucklen BS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Mar; 38(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 36681959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation in spine tumors.
Mazel C; Hoffmann E; Antonietti P; Grunenwald D; Henry M; Williams J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jun; 29(11):1246-53. PubMed ID: 15167665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws for Fixation Across the Cervicothoracic Junction: Surgical Technique and Outcomes.
Obeidat M; Tan Z; Finkelstein JA
Global Spine J; 2019 Dec; 9(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 31819852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical challenges in posterior cervicothoracic junction instrumentation.
Balestrino A; Gondar R; Jannelli G; Zona G; Tessitore E
Neurosurg Rev; 2021 Dec; 44(6):3447-3458. PubMed ID: 33754193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.
McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Xu R; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 19934991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervicothoracic junction kyphosis: surgical reconstruction with pedicle subtraction osteotomy and Smith-Petersen osteotomy. Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting. Clinical article.
Samudrala S; Vaynman S; Thiayananthan T; Ghostine S; Bergey DL; Anand N; Pashman RS; Johnson JP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):695-706. PubMed ID: 21121746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Considerations for the use of C7 crossing laminar screws in subaxial and cervicothoracic instrumentation.
Ilgenfritz RM; Gandhi AA; Fredericks DC; Grosland NM; Smucker JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(4):E199-204. PubMed ID: 23169075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical and thoracic sagittal misalignment after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study of all pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation.
Legarreta CA; Barrios C; Rositto GE; Reviriego JM; Maruenda JI; Escalada MN; Piza-Vallespir G; Burgos J; Hevia E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jul; 39(16):1330-7. PubMed ID: 24825159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Overpowering the Previously Posterior Instrumented Cervical Spine With Cage-Assisted Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Cadaveric Study.
Saville P; Gandhi RA; Smith HE; Arlet V
Spine Deform; 2018; 6(5):492-497. PubMed ID: 30122383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
Rhee JM; Kraiwattanapong C; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Nov; 30(21):E636-40. PubMed ID: 16261101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How I do it: tapered rod placement across the cervicothoracic junction for augmented posterior constructs.
Clifton W; Damon A; Pichelmann M
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2019 Dec; 161(12):2429-2431. PubMed ID: 31696301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical sagittal alignment in idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior instrumentation and in situ bending.
Charles YP; Sfeir G; Matter-Parrat V; Sauleau EA; Steib JP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(7):E419-27. PubMed ID: 25902150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical sagittal alignment in adult hyperkyphosis treated by posterior instrumentation and in situ bending.
Paternostre F; Charles YP; Sauleau EA; Steib JP
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Feb; 103(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 27889355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervicothoracic junction instrumentation strategies following separation surgery for spinal metastases.
Chakravarthy VB; Hussain I; Laufer I; Goldberg JL; Reiner AS; Villavieja J; Newman WC; Barzilai O; Bilsky M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Apr; 38(4):473-480. PubMed ID: 36609370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Posterior Rigid Instrumentation of C7: Surgical Considerations and Biomechanics at the Cervicothoracic Junction. A Review of the Literature.
Bayoumi AB; Efe IE; Berk S; Kasper EM; Toktas ZO; Konya D
World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():216-226. PubMed ID: 29253696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lateral mass screw-rod fixation of the cervical spine: a prospective clinical series with 1-year follow-up.
Deen HG; Birch BD; Wharen RE; Reimer R
Spine J; 2003; 3(6):489-95. PubMed ID: 14609694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
