These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36447820)

  • 1. Corrigendum: Using a Computerised Staircase and Incremental Optotype Sizes to Improve Visual Acuity Assessment Accuracy.
    O'Connor A; King C; Milling A; Tidbury L
    Br Ir Orthopt J; 2022; 18(1):159-160. PubMed ID: 36447820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using a Computerised Staircase and Incremental Optotype Sizes to Improve Visual Acuity Assessment Accuracy.
    O'Connor A; King C; Milling A; Tidbury L
    Br Ir Orthopt J; 2022; 18(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 35938054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.
    Ridder WH
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 139(3):207-219. PubMed ID: 31414313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new optotype chart for detection of nonorganic visual loss.
    Mojon DS; Flueckiger P
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Apr; 109(4):810-5. PubMed ID: 11927447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optotype and grating visual acuity in preschool children.
    Stiers P; Vanderkelen R; Vandenbussche E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Sep; 44(9):4123-30. PubMed ID: 12939336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preschool vision screening: negative predictive value for amblyopia.
    Newman DK; East MM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1999 Jun; 83(6):676-9. PubMed ID: 10340974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [How should visual acuity be measured?].
    Langrová H; Hejcmanová D; Peregrin J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 1996 Jul; 52(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 8768473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical usefulness of the teller acuity cards test in preliterate children and its correlation with optotype test: A retrospective study.
    Joo HJ; Yi HC; Choi DG
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0235290. PubMed ID: 32598392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The speed acuity test as a diagnostic aid in cerebral visual impairment.
    Tanke N; Barsingerhorn AD; Goossens J; Boonstra FN
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):10596. PubMed ID: 35732797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [DIN-compatible vision assessment of increased reproducibility using staircase measurement and maximum likelihood analysis].
    Weigmann U; Petersen J
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 8963126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Measurement of apparent accommodation with a 20/20 near vision optotype].
    Nawa Y; Nakatsuka M; Yoshii T; Kominami M; Hara Y; Uozato H
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Mar; 105(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 11280876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Eye Phone Study: reliability and accuracy of assessing Snellen visual acuity using smartphone technology.
    Perera C; Chakrabarti R; Islam FM; Crowston J
    Eye (Lond); 2015 Jul; 29(7):888-94. PubMed ID: 25931170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optotype and grating visual acuity in patients with ocular and cerebral visual impairment.
    Stiers P; Vanderkelen R; Vandenbussche E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 45(12):4333-9. PubMed ID: 15557440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols.
    Lalor SJH; Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
    Vision Res; 2016 Apr; 121():31-38. PubMed ID: 26878696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-based test to measure optimal visual acuity in age-related macular degeneration.
    González EG; Tarita-Nistor L; Markowitz SN; Steinbach MJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4838-45. PubMed ID: 17898311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia.
    McKee SP; Levi DM; Movshon JA
    J Vis; 2003; 3(5):380-405. PubMed ID: 12875634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes.
    Heinrich SP; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep; 251(9):2235-41. PubMed ID: 23828648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The measurement of visual acuity in children: an evidence-based update.
    Anstice NS; Thompson B
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Jan; 97(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 23902575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The "speed" of acuity in scotopic vs. photopic vision.
    Heinrich SP; Blechenberg T; Reichel C; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 258(12):2791-2798. PubMed ID: 32803325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual acuity assessment of children with neurological impairment using grating and vanishing optotype acuity cards.
    Mackie RT; Saunders KJ; Day RE; Dutton GN; McCulloch DL
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1996 Oct; 74(5):483-7. PubMed ID: 8950399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.