BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36448467)

  • 1. Multicenter experience with valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with primary, native valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Robich MP; Iribarne A; Butzel D; DiScipio AW; Dauerman HL; Leavitt BJ; DeSimone JP; Coylewright M; Flynn JM; Westbrook BM; Ver Lee PN; Zaky M; Quinn R; Malenka DJ
    J Card Surg; 2022 Dec; 37(12):4382-4388. PubMed ID: 36448467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Isolated Redo Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Valve Replacement.
    Patel PM; Chiou E; Cao Y; Binongo J; Guyton RA; Leshnower B; Grubb KJ; Chen EP
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Aug; 112(2):539-545. PubMed ID: 33129775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Choi CH; Cheng V; Malaver D; Kon N; Kincaid EH; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1106-1115. PubMed ID: 30588736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Valve-in-Surgical-Valve With SAPIEN 3 for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Based on Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality.
    Kaneko T; Makkar RR; Krishnaswami A; Hermiller J; Greenbaum A; Babaliaros V; Shah PB; Bailey SH; Bapat V; Kapadia S; Abbas AE
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 May; 14(5):e010288. PubMed ID: 34003666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?
    Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement of Failed Surgically Implanted Bioprostheses: The STS/ACC Registry.
    Tuzcu EM; Kapadia SR; Vemulapalli S; Carroll JD; Holmes DR; Mack MJ; Thourani VH; Grover FL; Brennan JM; Suri RM; Dai D; Svensson LG
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 72(4):370-382. PubMed ID: 30025572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Echocardiographic Versus Invasive Aortic Valve Gradients in Different Clinical Scenarios.
    Abbas AE; Khalili H; Madanat L; Elmariah S; Shannon F; Al-Azizi K; Waggoner T; Pilgrim T; Okuno T; Bavry A; Ternacle J; Christensen J; Cabau JR; Mack M; Pibarot P
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2023 Dec; 36(12):1302-1314. PubMed ID: 37507058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-Year Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Using New-Generation Transcatheter Devices Compared With Redo-SAVR.
    Nagasaka T; Koren O; Patel V; Naami R; Naami E; Shechter A; Kohan S; Allison Z; Lerner A; Cheng DE; Chakravarty T; Cheng W; Jilaihawi H; Ishii H; Nakamura M; Makkar RR
    Am J Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 207():380-389. PubMed ID: 37778227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerative Stentless Versus Stented Bioprostheses.
    Duncan A; Moat N; Simonato M; de Weger A; Kempfert J; Eggebrecht H; Walton A; Hellig F; Kornowski R; Spargias K; Mendiz O; Makkar R; Guerrero M; Rihal C; George I; Don C; Iadanza A; Bapat V; Welsh R; Wijeysundera HC; Wood D; Sathananthan J; Danenberg H; Maisano F; Garcia S; Gafoor S; Nombela-Franco L; Cobiella J; Dvir D
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(13):1256-1263. PubMed ID: 31202944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Aortic Valve Replacement as an Alternative to Surgical Re-Replacement.
    Deharo P; Bisson A; Herbert J; Lacour T; Etienne CS; Porto A; Theron A; Collart F; Bourguignon T; Cuisset T; Fauchier L
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 76(5):489-499. PubMed ID: 32731926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemodynamic and Mid-Term Outcomes for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Degenerated Internally Stented Valves.
    AlBadri A; Joseph J; Patel V; Patel D; Koren O; Cheng W; Jilaihawi H; Makkar R
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Mar; 16(5):542-554. PubMed ID: 36922040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes.
    Thandra A; Abusnina W; Jhand A; Shaikh K; Bansal R; Pajjuru VS; Al-Abdouh A; Kanmanthareddy A; Alla VM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jun; 97(7):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 33580743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for structural degeneration of previously implanted transcatheter valves (TAVR-in-TAVR): a systematic review.
    Gallo M; Fovino LN; Blitzer D; Doulamis IP; Guariento A; Salvador L; Tagliari AP; Ferrari E
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 May; 61(5):967-976. PubMed ID: 34662376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Redo-aortic valve replacement in prior stentless prosthetic aortic valves: Transcatheter versus surgical approach.
    Choi CH; Cao K; Malaver D; Kincaid EH; Lata A; Kon N; Belford PM; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jan; 99(1):181-192. PubMed ID: 34402588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture in Patients Undergoing Valve-in-Valve TAVR.
    Chhatriwalla AK; Allen KB; Depta JP; Rodriguez E; Thourani VH; Whisenant BK; Zahr F; Bapat V; Garcia S
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Mar; 16(5):530-539. PubMed ID: 36922038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early Outcomes for Valve-in-valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Degenerative Freestyle Bioprostheses.
    Sang SLW; Beute T; Heiser J; Berkompas D; Fanning J; Merhi W
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Autumn; 30(3):262-268. PubMed ID: 29158054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-Term Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Replacement.
    de Freitas Campos Guimarães L; Urena M; Wijeysundera HC; Munoz-Garcia A; Serra V; Benitez LM; Auffret V; Cheema AN; Amat-Santos IJ; Fisher Q; Himbert D; Garcia Del Blanco B; Dager A; Le Breton H; Paradis JM; Dumont E; Pibarot P; Rodés-Cabau J
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(9):e007038. PubMed ID: 30354588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Raschpichler M; de Waha S; Holzhey D; Schwarzer G; Flint N; Kaewkes D; Bräuchle PT; Dvir D; Makkar R; Ailawadi G; Abdel-Wahab M; Thiele H; Borger MA
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Dec; 11(24):e7965. PubMed ID: 36533610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Ahmad D; Yousef S; Kliner D; Brown JA; Serna-Gallegos D; Toma C; Makani A; West D; Wang Y; Thoma FW; Sultan I
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Mar; 215():1-7. PubMed ID: 38232811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bioprosthetic valve fracture: Technical insights from a multicenter study.
    Allen KB; Chhatriwalla AK; Saxon JT; Cohen DJ; Nguyen TC; Webb J; Loyalka P; Bavry AA; Rovin JD; Whisenant B; Dvir D; Kennedy KF; Thourani V; Lee R;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Nov; 158(5):1317-1328.e1. PubMed ID: 30857820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.