These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36449583)
1. Effect of Dyadic Haptic Collaboration on Ankle Motor Learning and Task Performance. Kim SJ; Wen Y; Ludvig D; Kucuktabak EB; Short MR; Lynch K; Hargrove L; Perreault EJ; Pons JL IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():416-425. PubMed ID: 36449583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Haptic Human-Human Interaction During an Ankle Tracking Task: Effects of Virtual Connection Stiffness. Short MR; Ludvig D; Kucuktabak EB; Wen Y; Vianello L; Perreault EJ; Hargrove L; Lynch K; Pons JL IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():3864-3873. PubMed ID: 37747854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Towards functional robotic training: motor learning of dynamic tasks is enhanced by haptic rendering but hampered by arm weight support. Özen Ö; Buetler KA; Marchal-Crespo L J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Feb; 19(1):19. PubMed ID: 35152897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Haptic Coupling in Dyads Improves Motor Learning in a Simple Force Field. Batson JP; Kato Y; Shuster K; Patton JL; Reed KB; Tsuji T; Novak D Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():4795-4798. PubMed ID: 33019063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual Physical Coupling of Two Lower-Limb Exoskeletons. Kucuktabak EB; Wen Y; Short M; Demirbas E; Lynch K; Pons J IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2023 Sep; 2023():1-6. PubMed ID: 37941279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of skill level matching in dyadic interaction on learning of a tracing task. Kager S; Hussain A; Cherpin A; Melendez-Calderon A; Takagi A; Endo S; Burdet E; Hirche S; Ang MH; Campolo D IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():824-829. PubMed ID: 31374732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Motor Learning in Robot-Based Haptic Dyads: A Review. Waters EL; Johnson MJ IEEE Trans Haptics; 2024 Mar; PP():. PubMed ID: 38502611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task. Marchal-Crespo L; van Raai M; Rauter G; Wolf P; Riener R Exp Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 231(3):277-91. PubMed ID: 24013789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Promoting Motor Variability During Robotic Assistance Enhances Motor Learning of Dynamic Tasks. Özen Ö; Buetler KA; Marchal-Crespo L Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():600059. PubMed ID: 33603642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Haptic Training: Which Types Facilitate (re)Learning of Which Motor Task and for Whom? Answers by a Review. Basalp E; Wolf P; Marchal-Crespo L IEEE Trans Haptics; 2021; 14(4):722-739. PubMed ID: 34388095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Design and Validation of a Lower-Limb Haptic Rehabilitation Robot. Dawson-Elli AR; Adamczyk PG IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Jul; 28(7):1584-1594. PubMed ID: 32634097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of error-amplification and haptic-guidance training techniques for learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy individuals. Milot MH; Marchal-Crespo L; Green CS; Cramer SC; Reinkensmeyer DJ Exp Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 201(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 19787345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Haptic human-human interaction does not improve individual visuomotor adaptation. Beckers N; van Asseldonk EHF; van der Kooij H Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19902. PubMed ID: 33199831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of haptic guidance, aging, and initial skill level on motor learning of a steering task. Marchal-Crespo L; McHughen S; Cramer SC; Reinkensmeyer DJ Exp Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 201(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 19820920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct Comparisons of Upper-Limb Motor Learning Performance Among Three Types of Haptic Guidance With Non-Assisted Condition in Spiral Drawing Task. Muramatsu H; Itaguchi Y; Yamada C; Yoshizawa H; Katsura S IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2024; 32():2545-2552. PubMed ID: 38995712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Human-machine-human interaction in motor control and rehabilitation: a review. Küçüktabak EB; Kim SJ; Wen Y; Lynch K; Pons JL J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Dec; 18(1):183. PubMed ID: 34961530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Haptic Error Modulation Outperforms Visual Error Amplification When Learning a Modified Gait Pattern. Marchal-Crespo L; Tsangaridis P; Obwegeser D; Maggioni S; Riener R Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():61. PubMed ID: 30837824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Movement Strategy Discovery during Training via Haptic Guidance. Gibo TL; Abbink DA IEEE Trans Haptics; 2016; 9(2):243-54. PubMed ID: 26766379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dissociating haptic feedback from physical assistance does not improve motor performance. Ivanova E; Pena-Perez N; Eden J; Yip Y; Burdet E Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-5. PubMed ID: 38083127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Haptic Guidance to Support Handwriting for Children With Cognitive and Fine Motor Delays. Park W; Babushkin V; Tahir S; Eid M IEEE Trans Haptics; 2021; 14(3):626-634. PubMed ID: 33769937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]