These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36450017)

  • 1. An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Evaluating Different Impression Techniques for Implant-Supported Prostheses in Partially and Completely Edentulous Arches.
    Gaikwad AM; Joshi AA; de Oliveira-Neto OB; Padhye AM; Nadgere JB; Ram SM; Yadav SR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(6):1119-1137. PubMed ID: 36450017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital vs Conventional Implant Impressions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Papaspyridakos P; Vazouras K; Chen YW; Kotina E; Natto Z; Kang K; Chochlidakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):660-678. PubMed ID: 32613641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses supported by three-dental-implants: A protocol of an overview of reviews.
    Afrashtehfar KI; Moawad RA; F-Eddin AW; Wang HL
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0265491. PubMed ID: 35377903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of impressions of multiple implants in the edentulous arch: a systematic review.
    Baig MR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):869-80. PubMed ID: 25032767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do implant-supported prostheses affect bioavailability of nutrients of complete and partially edentulous patients? A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Bezerra AP; Gama LT; Pereira LJ; van der Bilt A; Peyron MA; Rodrigues Garcia RCM; Gonçalves TMSV
    Clin Nutr; 2021 May; 40(5):3235-3249. PubMed ID: 33676775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: An evaluation of accuracy.
    Marghalani A; Weber HP; Finkelman M; Kudara Y; El Rafie K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):574-579. PubMed ID: 28927923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative clinical study on the transfer accuracy of conventional and digital implant impressions using a new reference key-based method.
    Schmidt A; Rein PE; Wöstmann B; Schlenz MA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Apr; 32(4):460-469. PubMed ID: 33469983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review.
    Zhang YJ; Shi JY; Qian SJ; Qiao SC; Lai HC
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2021 May; 14(2):157-179. PubMed ID: 34006079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review.
    Papaspyridakos P; Chen CJ; Gallucci GO; Doukoudakis A; Weber HP; Chronopoulos V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):836-45. PubMed ID: 25032763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes.
    Papaspyridakos P; Gallucci GO; Chen CJ; Hanssen S; Naert I; Vandenberghe B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 25682892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital assessment of the accuracy of implant impression techniques in free end saddle partially edentulous patients. A controlled clinical trial.
    Dohiem MM; Abdelaziz MS; Abdalla MF; Fawzy AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):486. PubMed ID: 36371189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Flügge T; van der Meer WJ; Gonzalez BG; Vach K; Wismeijer D; Wang P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():374-392. PubMed ID: 30328182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different Interventions for Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla with Implant-Supported Prostheses: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.
    Messias A; Nicolau P; Guerra F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021 Suppl; 34():s63-s84. PubMed ID: 33571327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Investigating the Efficacy of Different Nonsurgical Therapies for the Treatment of Peri-implant Diseases.
    Joshi AA; Gaikwad AM; Padhye AM; Nadgere JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(1):e13-e27. PubMed ID: 35235624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant prosthetic rehabilitation in partially edentulous patients with bone atrophy. An umbrella review based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.
    Merli M; Moscatelli M; Pagliaro U; Mariotti G; Merli I; Nieri M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(3):261-280. PubMed ID: 30246181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: a narrative review.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Kamposiora P; Papavasiliou G; Özcan M
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):37. PubMed ID: 33478459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Final-impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures.
    Jayaraman S; Singh BP; Ramanathan B; Pazhaniappan Pillai M; MacDonald L; Kirubakaran R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Apr; 4(4):CD012256. PubMed ID: 29617037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of Implant Number on Mandibular Implant-Supported Profile Prostheses: A Systematic Review.
    Lima LB; de Freitas NR; Novais VR; Simamoto Júnior PC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):795-807. PubMed ID: 30024995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Different implant impression techniques for edentulous patients treated with CAD/CAM complete-arch prostheses: a randomised controlled trial reporting data at 3 year post-loading.
    Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Mangani F; Barlattani A
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 24570979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of digital and silicone impressions for single-tooth implants and two- and three-unit implants for a free-end edentulous saddle.
    Nagata K; Fuchigami K; Okuhama Y; Wakamori K; Tsuruoka H; Nakashizu T; Hoshi N; Atsumi M; Kimoto K; Kawana H
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):464. PubMed ID: 34556111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.