These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3645146)

  • 21. Medical ethics concerning human offspring.
    Ranasinghe L
    Ceylon Med J; 1984 Dec; 29(4):167-76. PubMed ID: 6543676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reproductive technology and the procreation rights of the unmarried.
    Harv Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 98(3):669-85. PubMed ID: 11649801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surrogate motherhood, psychiatric screening and informed consent, baby selling, and public policy.
    Parker PJ
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 6713101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. ACOG guidelines on surrogate parenting issued.
    Ob Gyn News; 1983 Jun 15-30; 18(12):3, 34-35. PubMed ID: 11653448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice.
    Schenker JG; Frenkel DA
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 42(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 3614794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Birthing babies (or not): assisted reproduction in literature.
    Wear D
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 2003; 66(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 12710173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Infertility giving birth to new problems for doctors and lawyers.
    Goldman B
    CMAJ; 1988 Jan; 138(2):166-7. PubMed ID: 3334931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The right of abortion in surrogate motherhood arrangements.
    D'Aversa CY
    North Ill Univ Law Rev; 1987; 7(1):1-39. PubMed ID: 11658910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Attitude of the Protestant church to homologous and donor insemination].
    Honecker M
    Gynakologe; 1985 Dec; 18(4):216-9. PubMed ID: 4093034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Of milk-mothers and sacred bonds: Islam, patriarchy, and new reproductive technologies.
    Zuhur S
    Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1725-36. PubMed ID: 11653388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. New frontiers in conception: medical breakthroughs and moral dilemmas.
    Fleming AT
    N Y Times Mag; 1980 Jul; ():14-23, 42, 48+. PubMed ID: 11647742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. New reproductive technologies: some legal dilemmas.
    Donovan P
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1986; 18(2):57-60. PubMed ID: 3792523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The challenges of new reproductive technologies for Jewish ethics.
    Newman LE
    Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1651-62. PubMed ID: 11653385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Legal issues of the new reproductive technologies.
    Kinney LH
    Calif State Bar J; 1977; 52(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 11665044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reproduction without sex--but with the doctor.
    Brody EB
    Law Med Health Care; 1987; 15(3):152-5. PubMed ID: 3695576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Legislative guidelines to govern in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
    Williams HE
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 1986; 26(2):495-518. PubMed ID: 11651873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Switched at the fertility clinic: determining maternal rights when a child is born from stolen or misdelivered genetic material.
    Noble-Allgire AM
    Miss Law Rev; 1999; 64(3):517-94. PubMed ID: 16523582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Who are the parents of biotechnological children?
    Palmer LI
    Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The limits of reproductive technology: who decides?
    Agard ES; Wallach EE
    J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 10791284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Artificial insemination in involuntary sterility. A consensus statement against expert-based facts--IVF is banned, microsurgery praised].
    Hamberger L
    Lakartidningen; 1990 Sep; 87(38):2962-8. PubMed ID: 2215014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.