These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36451704)

  • 1. Ethical, Translational, and Legal Issues Surrounding the Novel Adoption of Ectogestative Technologies.
    Segers S; Romanis EC
    Risk Manag Healthc Policy; 2022; 15():2207-2220. PubMed ID: 36451704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The path toward ectogenesis: looking beyond the technical challenges.
    Segers S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 May; 22(1):59. PubMed ID: 33985480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical Development of Artificial Amniotic Sac and Placenta Technology: A Roadmap.
    Verweij EJ; De Proost L; van Laar JOEH; Frank L; Obermann-Borstn SA; Vermeulen MJ; van Baalen S; van der Hout-van der Jagt MB; Kingma E
    Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():793308. PubMed ID: 34956991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ectogestation ethics: The implications of artificially extending gestation for viability, newborn resuscitation and abortion.
    Di Stefano L; Mills C; Watkins A; Wilkinson D
    Bioethics; 2020 May; 34(4):371-384. PubMed ID: 31697404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Artificial womb technology and the frontiers of human reproduction: conceptual differences and potential implications.
    Romanis EC
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Nov; 44(11):751-755. PubMed ID: 30097459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neonatal incubator or artificial womb? Distinguishing ectogestation and ectogenesis using the metaphysics of pregnancy.
    Kingma E; Finn S
    Bioethics; 2020 May; 34(4):354-363. PubMed ID: 32249443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical considerations in the use of artificial womb/placenta technology.
    Werner KM; Mercurio MR
    Semin Perinatol; 2022 Apr; 46(3):151521. PubMed ID: 34893338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regulating abortion after ectogestation.
    Räsänen J
    J Med Ethics; 2023 Jun; 49(6):419-422. PubMed ID: 35725301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion & 'artificial wombs': would 'artificial womb' technology legally empower non-gestating genetic progenitors to participate in decisions about
    Romanis EC
    J Law Biosci; 2021; 8(1):lsab011. PubMed ID: 34055368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interprofessional Consensus Regarding Design Requirements for Liquid-Based Perinatal Life Support (PLS) Technology.
    van der Hout-van der Jagt MB; Verweij EJT; Andriessen P; de Boode WP; Bos AF; Delbressine FLM; Eggink AJ; Erwich JJHM; Feijs LMG; Groenendaal F; Kramer BWW; Lely AT; Loop RFAM; Neukamp F; Onland W; Oudijk MA; Te Pas AB; Reiss IKM; Schoberer M; Scholten RR; Spaanderman MEA; van der Ven M; Vermeulen MJ; van de Vosse FN; Oei SG
    Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():793531. PubMed ID: 35127593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethics Considerations Regarding Artificial Womb Technology for the Fetonate.
    De Bie FR; Kim SD; Bose SK; Nathanson P; Partridge EA; Flake AW; Feudtner C
    Am J Bioeth; 2023 May; 23(5):67-78. PubMed ID: 35362359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assisted gestative technologies.
    Romanis EC
    J Med Ethics; 2022 Jul; 48(7):439-446. PubMed ID: 35277466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial placenta and womb technology: Past, current, and future challenges towards clinical translation.
    De Bie FR; Davey MG; Larson AC; Deprest J; Flake AW
    Prenat Diagn; 2021 Jan; 41(1):145-158. PubMed ID: 32875581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Successful use of an artificial placenta-based life support system to treat extremely preterm ovine fetuses compromised by intrauterine inflammation.
    Usuda H; Watanabe S; Saito M; Ikeda H; Koshinami S; Sato S; Musk GC; Fee E; Carter S; Kumagai Y; Takahashi T; Takahashi Y; Kawamura S; Hanita T; Kure S; Yaegashi N; Newnham JP; Kemp MW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):755.e1-755.e20. PubMed ID: 32380175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artificial womb technology and clinical translation: Innovative treatment or medical research?
    Romanis EC
    Bioethics; 2020 May; 34(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 31782820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical considerations in tissue engineering research: Case studies in translation.
    Baker HB; McQuilling JP; King NM
    Methods; 2016 Apr; 99():135-44. PubMed ID: 26282436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethics and Law in Research on Algorithmic and Data-Driven Technology in Mental Health Care: Scoping Review.
    Gooding P; Kariotis T
    JMIR Ment Health; 2021 Jun; 8(6):e24668. PubMed ID: 34110297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Redefining procreation: facing the issues.
    Isaacs SL; Holt RJ
    Popul Bull; 1987 Sep; 42(3):3-35. PubMed ID: 12280676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artificial womb technology, pregnancy, and EU employment rights.
    Hooton V; Romanis EC
    J Law Biosci; 2022; 9(1):lsac009. PubMed ID: 35387389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.