These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36452674)

  • 1. Efficacy of Balloon Tamponade Versus Merocel Nasal Packs in Endoscopic Sinonasal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study.
    Pradhan P; Preetam C; Parida PK
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Oct; 74(Suppl 2):1113-1119. PubMed ID: 36452674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid Rhino versus Merocel nasal packs in septal surgery.
    Hesham A; Ghali A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Dec; 125(12):1244-6. PubMed ID: 21854674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double-blind randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel with Rapid Rhino nasal packs after routine nasal surgery.
    Arya AK; Butt O; Nigam A
    Rhinology; 2003 Dec; 41(4):241-3. PubMed ID: 14750352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of rapid rhino and merocel nasal packs in endonasal septal surgery.
    Ozcan C; Vayisoglu Y; Kiliç S; Görür K
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Dec; 37(6):826-31. PubMed ID: 19128711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of side effects and patient perceptions towards Rapid Rhino and Merocel packs in epistaxis.
    Mettias B; Karia CT; Irvine E; Conboy P
    J Laryngol Otol; 2024 Jun; 138(6):642-646. PubMed ID: 38230503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A meta-analysis compare rapid rhino with merocel for nasal packing].
    Yang X; Yi K; Tian J; Guo Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jul; 26(14):655-60. PubMed ID: 23156811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized trial of Rapid Rhino Riemann and Telfa nasal packs following endoscopic sinus surgery.
    Cruise AS; Amonoo-Kuofi K; Srouji I; Kanagalingam J; Georgalas C; Patel NN; Badia L; Lund VJ
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Feb; 31(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 16441798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial.
    Bresnihan M; Mehigan B; Curran A
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2007 Oct; 32(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 17883554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of gloved versus ungloved merocel
    Kaur J; Singh M; Kaur I; Singh A; Goyal S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1391-1395. PubMed ID: 30417834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Foam nasal packs: a prospective, randomised, patient-controlled study.
    Prabhu V; Kaushik V; Rhodes S; Tay H
    Rhinology; 2007 Sep; 45(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 17956027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A double-blind randomised controlled trial of gloved versus ungloved merocel middle meatal spacers for endoscopic sinus surgery.
    Akbari E; Philpott CM; Ostry AJ; Clark A; Javer AR
    Rhinology; 2012 Sep; 50(3):306-10. PubMed ID: 22888489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of medicated versus nonmedicated merocel sponges for functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
    Chang EH; Alandejani T; Akbari E; Ostry A; Javer A
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Feb; 40 Suppl 1():S14-9. PubMed ID: 21453656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of three different polyvinyl alcohol packs following functional endoscopic Nasal surgery.
    Melis A; Karligkiotis A; Bozzo C; Machouchas N; Volpi L; Castiglia P; Castelnuovo P; Meloni F
    Laryngoscope; 2015 May; 125(5):1067-71. PubMed ID: 25545810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparative Double Blind Study of Nasal Dressing Sponge
    Francesco L; Francesco D; Federico S; Michele MD; Salvatore G
    Iran J Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Nov; 33(119):369-373. PubMed ID: 35223654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy and Safety of Guardcel Nasal Packing After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study.
    Kang B; Kim JR; Shin JM; Park IH; Lee HM
    Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 10(3):248-253. PubMed ID: 27927009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nasal septal packing: which one?
    Acıoğlu E; Edizer DT; Yiğit Ö; Onur F; Alkan Z
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jul; 269(7):1777-81. PubMed ID: 22160143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of infiltrating nasal packing with local anesthetics in postoperative pain and anxiety following sinonasal surgeries: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
    Tsai SC; Lai MT; Kao YL; Wu CC
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2020; 86(3):376-382. PubMed ID: 32127341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Triamcinolone Impregnated Nasal Pack in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Our Experience.
    Sabarinath V; Harish MR; Divakaran S
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Mar; 69(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 28239586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The efficacy of Cutanplast nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
    Cho KS; Shin SK; Lee JH; Kim JY; Koo SK; Kim YW; Kim MJ; Roh HJ
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Mar; 123(3):564-8. PubMed ID: 23086679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biodegradable nasal packings for endoscopic sinonasal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yan M; Zheng D; Li Y; Zheng Q; Chen J; Yang B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115458. PubMed ID: 25526585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.