These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36455027)

  • 1. A comparison of the predictive accuracy of structured and unstructured risk assessment methods for the prediction of recidivism in individuals convicted of sexual and violent offense.
    Wertz M; Schobel S; Schiltz K; Rettenberger M
    Psychol Assess; 2023 Feb; 35(2):152-164. PubMed ID: 36455027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.
    Hanson RK; Morton-Bourgon KE
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Mar; 21(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 19290762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A field study of acute dynamic risk assessment in individuals convicted of sexual offenses.
    Nitsche K; Etzler S; Balas J; Eher R; Rettenberger M
    Psychol Assess; 2022 Jun; 34(6):583-594. PubMed ID: 35298221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protective factors in the prediction of criminal outcomes for youth with sexual offenses using tools developed for adults and adolescents: Tests of direct effects and moderation of risk.
    Langton CM; Awrey MJ; Worling JR
    Psychol Assess; 2023 Jun; 35(6):497-509. PubMed ID: 36862457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are mental disorders associated with recidivism in men convicted of sexual offenses?
    Biedermann L; Eher R; Rettenberger M; Gaunersdorfer K; Turner D
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2023 Jul; 148(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 36932913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments.
    Smid WJ; Kamphuis JH; Wever EC; Van Beek DJ
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):691-703. PubMed ID: 24773035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-Validation of the Revised Version of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG-R) in a Sample of Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offenses.
    Gregório Hertz P; Eher R; Etzler S; Rettenberger M
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Feb; 33(1):63-87. PubMed ID: 31010400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Machine Learning and Risk Assessment: Random Forest Does Not Outperform Logistic Regression in the Prediction of Sexual Recidivism.
    Etzler S; Schönbrodt FD; Pargent F; Eher R; Rettenberger M
    Assessment; 2024 Mar; 31(2):460-481. PubMed ID: 37039529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing the validity of criminal risk assessment tools in sexually abusive youth.
    Barra S; Bessler C; Landolt MA; Aebi M
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Nov; 30(11):1430-1443. PubMed ID: 29792506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Exploratory Study of Recidivism Risk Assessment Instruments for Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offenses in Singapore.
    Tsao IT; Chu CM
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Mar; 33(2):157-175. PubMed ID: 31674276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unguided clinical and actuarial assessment of re-offending risk: a direct comparison with sex offenders in Denmark.
    Bengtson S; Långström N
    Sex Abuse; 2007 Jun; 19(2):135-53. PubMed ID: 17534713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: The psychometric properties of the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG).
    Rettenberger M; Rice ME; Harris GT; Eher R
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):624-638. PubMed ID: 28594206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How the risk principle reduces recidivism: The impact of legislative revisions on the release and reoffense rates of individuals convicted of sexual offenses.
    Rettenberger M; Eher R
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Jun; 48(3):214-227. PubMed ID: 38949767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Is the use of patient records necessary to assess the risk of sexual, violent and general recidivism?].
    Bertsch I; Courtois R; Réveillère C; Pham T
    Encephale; 2022 Jun; 48(3):265-272. PubMed ID: 34728066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors Predicting Desistance From Reoffending: A Validation Study of the SAPROF in Sexual Offenders.
    Yoon D; Turner D; Klein V; Rettenberger M; Eher R; Briken P
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Feb; 62(3):697-716. PubMed ID: 27531703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting sexual and nonsexual recidivism in a consecutive sample of juveniles convicted of sexual offences.
    Aebi M; Plattner B; Steinhausen HC; Bessler C
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Dec; 23(4):456-73. PubMed ID: 21406605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Field validity of Static-99R and STABLE-2007 with 4,433 men serving sentences for sexual offences in British Columbia: New findings and meta-analysis.
    Helmus LM; Hanson RK; Murrie DC; Zabarauckas CL
    Psychol Assess; 2021 Jul; 33(7):581-595. PubMed ID: 34014750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What does it mean when age is related to recidivism among sex offenders?
    Rice ME; Harris GT
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Apr; 38(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 23876093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective multisite examination of dynamic sexual violence risk: Extension and update to Olver, Nicholaichuk, Kingston, and Wong (2014).
    Olver ME; Nicholaichuk TP; Kingston DA; Wong SCP
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2020 Apr; 88(4):362-371. PubMed ID: 31916798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Juvenile Psychopathy and Community Treatment Response in Youth Adjudicated for Sexual Offenses.
    Rojas EY; Olver ME
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2022 Nov; 66(15):1575-1602. PubMed ID: 33588613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.