169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36455222)
21. Comparison of endoscopic therapies for rectal carcinoid tumors: Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision versus endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Zhang J; Liu M; Li H; Chen J; Su H; Zheng J; Lin G; Lei X
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 42(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 28750769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison between endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap and endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Zheng X; Wu M; Shi H; Er L; Wang K; Cao Y; Li S
BMC Surg; 2022 Jun; 22(1):248. PubMed ID: 35761304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (with videos).
Park SS; Han KS; Kim B; Chang Kim B; Hong CW; Sohn DK; Chang HJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 May; 91(5):1164-1171.e2. PubMed ID: 31904380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. EMR-P for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: is it a preferred treatment?
Liu Z; Zheng C; Ding S; Chen C; Yang J; Wu R; Sun D
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 57(12):1503-1508. PubMed ID: 35758188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection provides comparable clinical outcomes to submucosal dissection for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum.
Cheung DY; Choi SK; Kim HK; Kim SS; Chae HS; Seo KJ; Cho YS
Surg Endosc; 2015 Jun; 29(6):1500-5. PubMed ID: 25277474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical outcomes and risk factors associated with poor prognosis after endoscopic resection of 10-20 mm rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a multicenter, retrospective study of 10-year experience.
Goo JJ; Baek DH; Kim HW; Lee HS; Lee JY; Park SB; Song GA; Lee SH; Lee JH;
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jul; 37(7):5196-5204. PubMed ID: 36947224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Endoscopic resection yields reliable outcomes for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Jeon JH; Cheung DY; Lee SJ; Kim HJ; Kim HK; Cho HJ; Lee IK; Kim JI; Park SH; Kim JK
Dig Endosc; 2014 Jul; 26(4):556-63. PubMed ID: 24447261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤10mm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhou C; Zhang F; We Y
Ann Saudi Med; 2023; 43(3):179-195. PubMed ID: 37270677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection With Circumferential Incision and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Rectal Carcinoid Tumor.
Chen R; Liu X; Sun S; Wang S; Ge N; Wang G; Guo J
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Jun; 26(3):e56-61. PubMed ID: 27213787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal carcinoid tumor. A meta-analysis and meta-regression with single-arm analysis.
Yong JN; Lim XC; Nistala KRY; Lim LKE; Lim GEH; Quek J; Tham HY; Wong NW; Tan KK; Chong CS
J Dig Dis; 2021 Oct; 22(10):562-571. PubMed ID: 34472210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Efficacy and safety of modified endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis.
Zheng JC; Zheng K; Zhao S; Wang ZN; Xu HM; Jiang CG
Z Gastroenterol; 2020 Feb; 58(2):137-145. PubMed ID: 32050284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligation device or endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumors: an analysis of 24 consecutive cases.
Niimi K; Goto O; Fujishiro M; Kodashima S; Ono S; Mochizuki S; Asada-Hirayama I; Konno-Shimizu M; Mikami-Matsuda R; Minatsuki C; Yamamichi N; Koike K
Dig Endosc; 2012 Nov; 24(6):443-7. PubMed ID: 23078437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison among different techniques for en-bloc resection of rectal lesions: transanal endoscopic surgery vs. endoscopic submucosal dissection vs. full-thickness resection device with Over-The-Scope Clip® System.
Bisogni D; Manetti R; Talamucci L; Coratti F; Naspetti R; Valeri A; Martellucci J; Cianchi F
Minerva Chir; 2020 Aug; 75(4):234-243. PubMed ID: 32456395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Efficacy and safety of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors and risk factors associated with incomplete endoscopic resection.
Wang XY; Chai NL; Linghu EQ; Li HK; Zhai YQ; Feng XX; Zhang WG; Zou JL; Li LS; Xiang JY
Ann Transl Med; 2020 Mar; 8(6):368. PubMed ID: 32355812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors.
Park HW; Byeon JS; Park YS; Yang DH; Yoon SM; Kim KJ; Ye BD; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Kim JH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 20381798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in rectal neuroendocrine tumors based on resection margin status: a real-world study.
Sun D; Ren Z; Xu E; Cai S; Qi Z; Chen Z; Liu J; Shi Q; Zhou P; Zhong Y
Surg Endosc; 2023 Apr; 37(4):2644-2652. PubMed ID: 36380122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Efficacy of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a rescue treatment in difficult colorectal ESD cases.
Okamoto K; Muguruma N; Kagemoto K; Mitsui Y; Fujimoto D; Kitamura S; Kimura T; Sogabe M; Miyamoto H; Takayama T
Dig Endosc; 2017 Apr; 29 Suppl 2():45-52. PubMed ID: 28425649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical outcomes of cap-assisted endoscopic resection for small rectal subepithelial tumors.
Wang J; Lin S; Qiao W; Liu S; Zhi F
Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021; 44(6):418-423. PubMed ID: 33303284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Endoscopic submucosal resection with an endoscopic variceal ligation device for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Ebi M; Nakagawa S; Yamaguchi Y; Tamura Y; Izawa S; Hijikata Y; Shimura T; Funaki Y; Ogasawara N; Sasaki M; Joh T; Kasugai K
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1703-1708. PubMed ID: 30167779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Stenosis rates after endoscopic submucosal dissection of large rectal tumors involving greater than three quarters of the luminal circumference.
Abe S; Sakamoto T; Takamaru H; Yamada M; Nakajima T; Matsuda T; Saito Y
Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5459-5464. PubMed ID: 27126623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]