These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36455448)

  • 1. The Value of Explicit, Deliberative, and Context-Specified Ethics Analysis for Health Technology Assessment: Evidence From a Novel Approach Piloted in South Africa.
    Krubiner CB; Tugendhaft A; DiStefano MJ; Barsdorf NW; Merritt MW; Goldstein SJ; Mosam A; Potgieter S; Hofman KJ; Faden RR
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2023 Mar; 34():23-30. PubMed ID: 36455448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing and piloting a context-specified ethics framework for health technology assessment: the South African Values and Ethics for Universal Health Coverage approach.
    Krubiner CB; Barsdorf NW; Goldstein SJ; Mosam A; Potgieter S; DiStefano MJ; Tugendhaft A; Merritt MW; Li R; Chalkidou K; Faden RR; Hofman KJ
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2022 Mar; 38(1):e26. PubMed ID: 35256036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Introducing an Ethics Framework for health priority-setting in South Africa on the path to universal health coverage.
    Blaauw D; Chambers C; Chirwa T; Duba N; Gwyther L; Hofman K; London L; Masilela T; McKerrow N; Modupe O; Moeng L; Mubaiwa V; Nematswerani N; Ramkissoon Y; Saloojee Y; Tshabalala S; Valabhjee K; Versteeg-Mojanaga M; Barsdorf N; Conco D; DiStefano M; Li R; Chalkidou K; Faden R; Goldstein S; Hofman K; Krubiner CB; Merritt MW; Mosam A; Potgieter S; Tugendhaft A
    S Afr Med J; 2022 Mar; 112(3):240-244. PubMed ID: 35380528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) for health technology assessment: the Queensland Health experience.
    Howard S; Scott IA; Ju H; McQueen L; Scuffham PA
    Aust Health Rev; 2019 Oct; 43(5):591-599. PubMed ID: 30205873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CHAT SA: Modification of a Public Engagement Tool for Priority Setting for a South African Rural Context.
    Tugendhaft A; Danis M; Christofides N; Kahn K; Erzse A; Gold M; Twine R; Khosa A; Hofman K
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Feb; 11(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 32654436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health technology assessment for sexual reproductive health and rights benefits package design in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review of evidence-informed deliberative processes.
    Simangolwa WM; Mbonigaba J; Govender K
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0306042. PubMed ID: 38935794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deliberative engagement methods on health care priority-setting in a rural South African community.
    Tugendhaft A; Hofman K; Danis M; Kahn K; Erzse A; Twine R; Gold M; Christofides N
    Health Policy Plan; 2021 Sep; 36(8):1279-1291. PubMed ID: 34051093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness.
    Baltussen R; Jansen MP; Mikkelsen E; Tromp N; Hontelez J; Bijlmakers L; Van der Wilt GJ
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2016 Nov; 5(11):615-618. PubMed ID: 27801355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrating Health Technology Assessment and the Right to Health in South Africa: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Substantive Values in Landmark Judicial Decisions.
    DiStefano MJ; Karim SA; Krubiner CB; Hofman KJ
    J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(1):131-149. PubMed ID: 37226744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modelling approaches for histology-independent cancer drugs to inform NICE appraisals: a systematic review and decision-framework.
    Murphy P; Glynn D; Dias S; Hodgson R; Claxton L; Beresford L; Cooper K; Tappenden P; Ennis K; Grosso A; Wright K; Cantrell A; Stevenson M; Palmer S
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Dec; 25(76):1-228. PubMed ID: 34990339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Insurance Benefit Package Revision in Iran.
    Nouhi M; Baltussen R; Razavi SS; Bijlmakers L; Sahraian MA; Goudarzi Z; Farokhian P; Khedmati J; Jahangiri R; Olyaeemanesh A
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Dec; 11(11):2719-2726. PubMed ID: 35247943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for UHC: Progress, Potential and Prudence Comment on "Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design - Part II: A Practical Guide".
    Gopinathan U
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7541. PubMed ID: 37579471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Universal Health Coverage: Broadening the Scope Comment on "Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness".
    Gopinathan U; Ottersen T
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2017 Aug; 6(8):473-475. PubMed ID: 28812847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrating health technology assessment and the right to health: a qualitative content analysis of procedural values in South African judicial decisions.
    DiStefano MJ; Abdool Karim S; Krubiner CB
    Health Policy Plan; 2022 May; 37(5):644-654. PubMed ID: 34792599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health technology assessment: a comprehensive framework for evidence-based recommendations in Ontario.
    Johnson AP; Sikich NJ; Evans G; Evans W; Giacomini M; Glendining M; Krahn M; Levin L; Oh P; Perera C
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Apr; 25(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19366496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health Technology Assessment: Global Advocacy and Local Realities Comment on "Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness".
    Chalkidou K; Li R; Culyer AJ; Glassman A; Hofman KJ; Teerawattananon Y
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2017 Apr; 6(4):233-236. PubMed ID: 28812807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health research prioritization in Somalia: setting the agenda for context specific knowledge to advance universal health coverage.
    Ssendagire S; Mohamoud SA; Bashir F; Jamal MA; Bulale M; Azad A; Warsame MY; Hassan F; Omar M; Dalmar A; Karanja MJ; Nyagah LM; Warsame A; Diriye AA; Malik SMMR
    Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1202034. PubMed ID: 38026320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Healthcare equity analysis: applying the Tanahashi model of health service coverage to community health systems following devolution in Kenya.
    McCollum R; Taegtmeyer M; Otiso L; Mireku M; Muturi N; Martineau T; Theobald S
    Int J Equity Health; 2019 May; 18(1):65. PubMed ID: 31064355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health technology assessment and priority setting for universal health coverage: a qualitative study of stakeholders' capacity, needs, policy areas of demand and perspectives in Nigeria.
    Uzochukwu BSC; Okeke C; O'Brien N; Ruiz F; Sombie I; Hollingworth S
    Global Health; 2020 Jul; 16(1):58. PubMed ID: 32641066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.